Latest mountain bike news

Abstract image featuring a 3D graph overlaying a terrain model with a bicycle, possibly indicating data analysis or mapping in an outdoor or cycling context. The letters "IBP" are prominently displayed in the foreground.
MTB Tips
Comparing mountain bike trails
Feb 7, 2008
  1
<img align="left" alt="imagenibp.jpg" style="padding-right: 10px" id="image697" title="imagenibp.jpg" src="https://images.singletracks.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/imagenibp.jpg" />With the ongoing intersection of technology and mountain biking there have been some recent efforts to quantify and compare mountain bike trails. While the idea may sounds strange, some interesting progress has been made. The <a href="http://www.ibpindex.com/eng/index_i.asp">International Bike Parameters Index</a> (IBP Index) "is an index that values the difficulty of a mountain bike route or a road bike route" using GPS data collected on the bike. For example, you can upload your GPS data from a ride and the IBP Index will calculate things like distance and the grade along the route. I tried the index for a few rides with mixed results and I concluded the usefulness really depends on the quality of your GPS data. <a href="http://www.topofusion.com/">TopoFusion</a> includes two similar indices for GPS tracks, one called the "difficulty index," and the other the "effort index." While the numbers don't mean anything when taken by themselves, they are useful to compare across rides to get an idea of relative difficulty. Here on singletracks we've even <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/blog/?p=596">taken a stab</a> at quantifying the technical aspects of mountain biking. Using the IMBA trail difficulty rating system we give members the chance to rate the technical difficulty of mountain bike trails around the world. Those ratings are then aggregated leading to an average or consensus rating for each trail. Such a rating would be difficult to compile without software and the distributed nature of the internet--yet another way technology is helping quantify MTB trails. In the end though, no amount of technology or group polling will ever fully quantify a mountain bike trail. Even if you could take things into account like scenery, tread, and the like, could a number ever really communicate what it's like to ride a mountain bike trail? It would be like trying to compare your friends--sure some friends are better than others but really they're just <em>different</em> and you like them each for different reasons. Instead of relying on a rating, why not get out and ride for yourself--you might just be surprised at what you find!
Culture
Bikochondriacs
Feb 6, 2008
Map displaying a topographic view with plotted hiking routes highlighted in yellow. The left panel lists various active logs with dates and points, while the map features terrain contours, trail markers, and landmarks, including "Captain Jack" and "Stonewall Fall."
Mountain Bikes and Gear
Garmin MapSource Review
Feb 5, 2008
A mountain biker performing a jump on a trail surrounded by bare trees in a forest setting. The ground is covered with leaves, and the scene depicts a sunny day with clear skies.
Mountain Bike Trails
Dauset Trails Ride Report
Feb 4, 2008
<img align="left" alt="imagenibp.jpg" style="padding-right: 10px" id="image697" title="imagenibp.jpg" src="https://images.singletracks.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/imagenibp.jpg" />With the ongoing intersection of technology and mountain biking there have been some recent efforts to quantify and compare mountain bike trails. While the idea may sounds strange, some interesting progress has been made. The <a href="http://www.ibpindex.com/eng/index_i.asp">International Bike Parameters Index</a> (IBP Index) "is an index that values the difficulty of a mountain bike route or a road bike route" using GPS data collected on the bike. For example, you can upload your GPS data from a ride and the IBP Index will calculate things like distance and the grade along the route. I tried the index for a few rides with mixed results and I concluded the usefulness really depends on the quality of your GPS data. <a href="http://www.topofusion.com/">TopoFusion</a> includes two similar indices for GPS tracks, one called the "difficulty index," and the other the "effort index." While the numbers don't mean anything when taken by themselves, they are useful to compare across rides to get an idea of relative difficulty. Here on singletracks we've even <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/blog/?p=596">taken a stab</a> at quantifying the technical aspects of mountain biking. Using the IMBA trail difficulty rating system we give members the chance to rate the technical difficulty of mountain bike trails around the world. Those ratings are then aggregated leading to an average or consensus rating for each trail. Such a rating would be difficult to compile without software and the distributed nature of the internet--yet another way technology is helping quantify MTB trails. In the end though, no amount of technology or group polling will ever fully quantify a mountain bike trail. Even if you could take things into account like scenery, tread, and the like, could a number ever really communicate what it's like to ride a mountain bike trail? It would be like trying to compare your friends--sure some friends are better than others but really they're just <em>different</em> and you like them each for different reasons. Instead of relying on a rating, why not get out and ride for yourself--you might just be surprised at what you find!
Mountain Bikes and Gear
Made in the USA.... Mountainbikes
Feb 1, 2008
  1
Two mountain bikers are seen in mid-air, jumping over a barrier with a logo in the foreground. A grassy hillside and spectators in the background suggest an outdoor biking event, with rolling hills and a cloudy sky visible.
Community
Sea Otter Classic is world's largest cycling event?
Jan 31, 2008
A DVD cover featuring a woman in cycling apparel, smiling and positioned on an exercise bike. The title reads "Cycle - All Terrain with Brooke Hayward," and the logo for Softride is displayed at the bottom. The background is a gradient, enhancing the focus on the cyclist.
Culture
All Terrain Cycling becomes Mountain Biking
Jan 30, 2008
  1
<img align="left" alt="imagenibp.jpg" style="padding-right: 10px" id="image697" title="imagenibp.jpg" src="https://images.singletracks.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/imagenibp.jpg" />With the ongoing intersection of technology and mountain biking there have been some recent efforts to quantify and compare mountain bike trails. While the idea may sounds strange, some interesting progress has been made. The <a href="http://www.ibpindex.com/eng/index_i.asp">International Bike Parameters Index</a> (IBP Index) "is an index that values the difficulty of a mountain bike route or a road bike route" using GPS data collected on the bike. For example, you can upload your GPS data from a ride and the IBP Index will calculate things like distance and the grade along the route. I tried the index for a few rides with mixed results and I concluded the usefulness really depends on the quality of your GPS data. <a href="http://www.topofusion.com/">TopoFusion</a> includes two similar indices for GPS tracks, one called the "difficulty index," and the other the "effort index." While the numbers don't mean anything when taken by themselves, they are useful to compare across rides to get an idea of relative difficulty. Here on singletracks we've even <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/blog/?p=596">taken a stab</a> at quantifying the technical aspects of mountain biking. Using the IMBA trail difficulty rating system we give members the chance to rate the technical difficulty of mountain bike trails around the world. Those ratings are then aggregated leading to an average or consensus rating for each trail. Such a rating would be difficult to compile without software and the distributed nature of the internet--yet another way technology is helping quantify MTB trails. In the end though, no amount of technology or group polling will ever fully quantify a mountain bike trail. Even if you could take things into account like scenery, tread, and the like, could a number ever really communicate what it's like to ride a mountain bike trail? It would be like trying to compare your friends--sure some friends are better than others but really they're just <em>different</em> and you like them each for different reasons. Instead of relying on a rating, why not get out and ride for yourself--you might just be surprised at what you find!
Culture
Lance Armstrong loses mountain bike race
Jan 29, 2008
  1
<img align="left" alt="imagenibp.jpg" style="padding-right: 10px" id="image697" title="imagenibp.jpg" src="https://images.singletracks.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/imagenibp.jpg" />With the ongoing intersection of technology and mountain biking there have been some recent efforts to quantify and compare mountain bike trails. While the idea may sounds strange, some interesting progress has been made. The <a href="http://www.ibpindex.com/eng/index_i.asp">International Bike Parameters Index</a> (IBP Index) "is an index that values the difficulty of a mountain bike route or a road bike route" using GPS data collected on the bike. For example, you can upload your GPS data from a ride and the IBP Index will calculate things like distance and the grade along the route. I tried the index for a few rides with mixed results and I concluded the usefulness really depends on the quality of your GPS data. <a href="http://www.topofusion.com/">TopoFusion</a> includes two similar indices for GPS tracks, one called the "difficulty index," and the other the "effort index." While the numbers don't mean anything when taken by themselves, they are useful to compare across rides to get an idea of relative difficulty. Here on singletracks we've even <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/blog/?p=596">taken a stab</a> at quantifying the technical aspects of mountain biking. Using the IMBA trail difficulty rating system we give members the chance to rate the technical difficulty of mountain bike trails around the world. Those ratings are then aggregated leading to an average or consensus rating for each trail. Such a rating would be difficult to compile without software and the distributed nature of the internet--yet another way technology is helping quantify MTB trails. In the end though, no amount of technology or group polling will ever fully quantify a mountain bike trail. Even if you could take things into account like scenery, tread, and the like, could a number ever really communicate what it's like to ride a mountain bike trail? It would be like trying to compare your friends--sure some friends are better than others but really they're just <em>different</em> and you like them each for different reasons. Instead of relying on a rating, why not get out and ride for yourself--you might just be surprised at what you find!
Culture
West Virginia faces loss of bike trails in wilderness bill
Jan 25, 2008
<img align="left" alt="imagenibp.jpg" style="padding-right: 10px" id="image697" title="imagenibp.jpg" src="https://images.singletracks.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/imagenibp.jpg" />With the ongoing intersection of technology and mountain biking there have been some recent efforts to quantify and compare mountain bike trails. While the idea may sounds strange, some interesting progress has been made. The <a href="http://www.ibpindex.com/eng/index_i.asp">International Bike Parameters Index</a> (IBP Index) "is an index that values the difficulty of a mountain bike route or a road bike route" using GPS data collected on the bike. For example, you can upload your GPS data from a ride and the IBP Index will calculate things like distance and the grade along the route. I tried the index for a few rides with mixed results and I concluded the usefulness really depends on the quality of your GPS data. <a href="http://www.topofusion.com/">TopoFusion</a> includes two similar indices for GPS tracks, one called the "difficulty index," and the other the "effort index." While the numbers don't mean anything when taken by themselves, they are useful to compare across rides to get an idea of relative difficulty. Here on singletracks we've even <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/blog/?p=596">taken a stab</a> at quantifying the technical aspects of mountain biking. Using the IMBA trail difficulty rating system we give members the chance to rate the technical difficulty of mountain bike trails around the world. Those ratings are then aggregated leading to an average or consensus rating for each trail. Such a rating would be difficult to compile without software and the distributed nature of the internet--yet another way technology is helping quantify MTB trails. In the end though, no amount of technology or group polling will ever fully quantify a mountain bike trail. Even if you could take things into account like scenery, tread, and the like, could a number ever really communicate what it's like to ride a mountain bike trail? It would be like trying to compare your friends--sure some friends are better than others but really they're just <em>different</em> and you like them each for different reasons. Instead of relying on a rating, why not get out and ride for yourself--you might just be surprised at what you find!
Community
Snow MTB racing in Maine
Jan 24, 2008
<img align="left" alt="imagenibp.jpg" style="padding-right: 10px" id="image697" title="imagenibp.jpg" src="https://images.singletracks.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/imagenibp.jpg" />With the ongoing intersection of technology and mountain biking there have been some recent efforts to quantify and compare mountain bike trails. While the idea may sounds strange, some interesting progress has been made. The <a href="http://www.ibpindex.com/eng/index_i.asp">International Bike Parameters Index</a> (IBP Index) "is an index that values the difficulty of a mountain bike route or a road bike route" using GPS data collected on the bike. For example, you can upload your GPS data from a ride and the IBP Index will calculate things like distance and the grade along the route. I tried the index for a few rides with mixed results and I concluded the usefulness really depends on the quality of your GPS data. <a href="http://www.topofusion.com/">TopoFusion</a> includes two similar indices for GPS tracks, one called the "difficulty index," and the other the "effort index." While the numbers don't mean anything when taken by themselves, they are useful to compare across rides to get an idea of relative difficulty. Here on singletracks we've even <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/blog/?p=596">taken a stab</a> at quantifying the technical aspects of mountain biking. Using the IMBA trail difficulty rating system we give members the chance to rate the technical difficulty of mountain bike trails around the world. Those ratings are then aggregated leading to an average or consensus rating for each trail. Such a rating would be difficult to compile without software and the distributed nature of the internet--yet another way technology is helping quantify MTB trails. In the end though, no amount of technology or group polling will ever fully quantify a mountain bike trail. Even if you could take things into account like scenery, tread, and the like, could a number ever really communicate what it's like to ride a mountain bike trail? It would be like trying to compare your friends--sure some friends are better than others but really they're just <em>different</em> and you like them each for different reasons. Instead of relying on a rating, why not get out and ride for yourself--you might just be surprised at what you find!
Culture
24-hour mountain bike racing: Solo!
Jan 24, 2008
A black bicycle helmet displayed on a mannequin head, featuring built-in blue LED lights for enhanced visibility. The helmet has mesh ventilation and adjustable straps.
Mountain Bikes and Gear
Beret Helmet
Jan 23, 2008
  1
<img align="left" alt="imagenibp.jpg" style="padding-right: 10px" id="image697" title="imagenibp.jpg" src="https://images.singletracks.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/imagenibp.jpg" />With the ongoing intersection of technology and mountain biking there have been some recent efforts to quantify and compare mountain bike trails. While the idea may sounds strange, some interesting progress has been made. The <a href="http://www.ibpindex.com/eng/index_i.asp">International Bike Parameters Index</a> (IBP Index) "is an index that values the difficulty of a mountain bike route or a road bike route" using GPS data collected on the bike. For example, you can upload your GPS data from a ride and the IBP Index will calculate things like distance and the grade along the route. I tried the index for a few rides with mixed results and I concluded the usefulness really depends on the quality of your GPS data. <a href="http://www.topofusion.com/">TopoFusion</a> includes two similar indices for GPS tracks, one called the "difficulty index," and the other the "effort index." While the numbers don't mean anything when taken by themselves, they are useful to compare across rides to get an idea of relative difficulty. Here on singletracks we've even <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/blog/?p=596">taken a stab</a> at quantifying the technical aspects of mountain biking. Using the IMBA trail difficulty rating system we give members the chance to rate the technical difficulty of mountain bike trails around the world. Those ratings are then aggregated leading to an average or consensus rating for each trail. Such a rating would be difficult to compile without software and the distributed nature of the internet--yet another way technology is helping quantify MTB trails. In the end though, no amount of technology or group polling will ever fully quantify a mountain bike trail. Even if you could take things into account like scenery, tread, and the like, could a number ever really communicate what it's like to ride a mountain bike trail? It would be like trying to compare your friends--sure some friends are better than others but really they're just <em>different</em> and you like them each for different reasons. Instead of relying on a rating, why not get out and ride for yourself--you might just be surprised at what you find!
Culture
Winter MTB News Round-up
Jan 22, 2008
<img align="left" alt="imagenibp.jpg" style="padding-right: 10px" id="image697" title="imagenibp.jpg" src="https://images.singletracks.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/imagenibp.jpg" />With the ongoing intersection of technology and mountain biking there have been some recent efforts to quantify and compare mountain bike trails. While the idea may sounds strange, some interesting progress has been made. The <a href="http://www.ibpindex.com/eng/index_i.asp">International Bike Parameters Index</a> (IBP Index) "is an index that values the difficulty of a mountain bike route or a road bike route" using GPS data collected on the bike. For example, you can upload your GPS data from a ride and the IBP Index will calculate things like distance and the grade along the route. I tried the index for a few rides with mixed results and I concluded the usefulness really depends on the quality of your GPS data. <a href="http://www.topofusion.com/">TopoFusion</a> includes two similar indices for GPS tracks, one called the "difficulty index," and the other the "effort index." While the numbers don't mean anything when taken by themselves, they are useful to compare across rides to get an idea of relative difficulty. Here on singletracks we've even <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/blog/?p=596">taken a stab</a> at quantifying the technical aspects of mountain biking. Using the IMBA trail difficulty rating system we give members the chance to rate the technical difficulty of mountain bike trails around the world. Those ratings are then aggregated leading to an average or consensus rating for each trail. Such a rating would be difficult to compile without software and the distributed nature of the internet--yet another way technology is helping quantify MTB trails. In the end though, no amount of technology or group polling will ever fully quantify a mountain bike trail. Even if you could take things into account like scenery, tread, and the like, could a number ever really communicate what it's like to ride a mountain bike trail? It would be like trying to compare your friends--sure some friends are better than others but really they're just <em>different</em> and you like them each for different reasons. Instead of relying on a rating, why not get out and ride for yourself--you might just be surprised at what you find!
Culture
Mountain biking in January is rough
Jan 21, 2008
A folding handsaw with a serrated blade and a red rubber grip handle. The blade features text indicating "RAZOR SHARP TEETH."
Community
MLK Day of Service: Trail work
Jan 17, 2008
Close-up of a newspaper article titled "Money &amp;," featuring a vintage style and sepia tones. The text suggests a focus on financial news and market trends.
Culture
Mountain Bike Investments: Stocks for 2008
Jan 16, 2008
<img align="left" alt="imagenibp.jpg" style="padding-right: 10px" id="image697" title="imagenibp.jpg" src="https://images.singletracks.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/imagenibp.jpg" />With the ongoing intersection of technology and mountain biking there have been some recent efforts to quantify and compare mountain bike trails. While the idea may sounds strange, some interesting progress has been made. The <a href="http://www.ibpindex.com/eng/index_i.asp">International Bike Parameters Index</a> (IBP Index) "is an index that values the difficulty of a mountain bike route or a road bike route" using GPS data collected on the bike. For example, you can upload your GPS data from a ride and the IBP Index will calculate things like distance and the grade along the route. I tried the index for a few rides with mixed results and I concluded the usefulness really depends on the quality of your GPS data. <a href="http://www.topofusion.com/">TopoFusion</a> includes two similar indices for GPS tracks, one called the "difficulty index," and the other the "effort index." While the numbers don't mean anything when taken by themselves, they are useful to compare across rides to get an idea of relative difficulty. Here on singletracks we've even <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/blog/?p=596">taken a stab</a> at quantifying the technical aspects of mountain biking. Using the IMBA trail difficulty rating system we give members the chance to rate the technical difficulty of mountain bike trails around the world. Those ratings are then aggregated leading to an average or consensus rating for each trail. Such a rating would be difficult to compile without software and the distributed nature of the internet--yet another way technology is helping quantify MTB trails. In the end though, no amount of technology or group polling will ever fully quantify a mountain bike trail. Even if you could take things into account like scenery, tread, and the like, could a number ever really communicate what it's like to ride a mountain bike trail? It would be like trying to compare your friends--sure some friends are better than others but really they're just <em>different</em> and you like them each for different reasons. Instead of relying on a rating, why not get out and ride for yourself--you might just be surprised at what you find!
Culture
MTB News Round Up: January 15, 2008
Jan 15, 2008
Image of a mountain bike with highlighted components featuring Thomson seatpost and stem. The text at the bottom reads "State of the Art Seatposts &amp; Stems."
Community
Thomson Appreciation Day: This Saturday, January 19
Jan 14, 2008
<img align="left" alt="imagenibp.jpg" style="padding-right: 10px" id="image697" title="imagenibp.jpg" src="https://images.singletracks.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/imagenibp.jpg" />With the ongoing intersection of technology and mountain biking there have been some recent efforts to quantify and compare mountain bike trails. While the idea may sounds strange, some interesting progress has been made. The <a href="http://www.ibpindex.com/eng/index_i.asp">International Bike Parameters Index</a> (IBP Index) "is an index that values the difficulty of a mountain bike route or a road bike route" using GPS data collected on the bike. For example, you can upload your GPS data from a ride and the IBP Index will calculate things like distance and the grade along the route. I tried the index for a few rides with mixed results and I concluded the usefulness really depends on the quality of your GPS data. <a href="http://www.topofusion.com/">TopoFusion</a> includes two similar indices for GPS tracks, one called the "difficulty index," and the other the "effort index." While the numbers don't mean anything when taken by themselves, they are useful to compare across rides to get an idea of relative difficulty. Here on singletracks we've even <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/blog/?p=596">taken a stab</a> at quantifying the technical aspects of mountain biking. Using the IMBA trail difficulty rating system we give members the chance to rate the technical difficulty of mountain bike trails around the world. Those ratings are then aggregated leading to an average or consensus rating for each trail. Such a rating would be difficult to compile without software and the distributed nature of the internet--yet another way technology is helping quantify MTB trails. In the end though, no amount of technology or group polling will ever fully quantify a mountain bike trail. Even if you could take things into account like scenery, tread, and the like, could a number ever really communicate what it's like to ride a mountain bike trail? It would be like trying to compare your friends--sure some friends are better than others but really they're just <em>different</em> and you like them each for different reasons. Instead of relying on a rating, why not get out and ride for yourself--you might just be surprised at what you find!
Culture
Togas, Laurels, and Chariots...... Mountainbike Chariots
Jan 12, 2008
An image of the flag of the United States, featuring 13 alternating horizontal stripes of red and white, with a blue canton containing 50 white stars arranged in nine rows.
Mountain Bikes and Gear
Mountain bikes: More expensive than a dirt bike
Jan 11, 2008
A black cylindrical device with a sleek design, featuring the text "VidiR" on its surface. It has two horizontal slots and an orange indicator. The device is likely a type of camera accessory or mount.
Mountain Bikes and Gear
Bike tech at CES this week
Jan 10, 2008
<img align="left" alt="imagenibp.jpg" style="padding-right: 10px" id="image697" title="imagenibp.jpg" src="https://images.singletracks.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/imagenibp.jpg" />With the ongoing intersection of technology and mountain biking there have been some recent efforts to quantify and compare mountain bike trails. While the idea may sounds strange, some interesting progress has been made. The <a href="http://www.ibpindex.com/eng/index_i.asp">International Bike Parameters Index</a> (IBP Index) "is an index that values the difficulty of a mountain bike route or a road bike route" using GPS data collected on the bike. For example, you can upload your GPS data from a ride and the IBP Index will calculate things like distance and the grade along the route. I tried the index for a few rides with mixed results and I concluded the usefulness really depends on the quality of your GPS data. <a href="http://www.topofusion.com/">TopoFusion</a> includes two similar indices for GPS tracks, one called the "difficulty index," and the other the "effort index." While the numbers don't mean anything when taken by themselves, they are useful to compare across rides to get an idea of relative difficulty. Here on singletracks we've even <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/blog/?p=596">taken a stab</a> at quantifying the technical aspects of mountain biking. Using the IMBA trail difficulty rating system we give members the chance to rate the technical difficulty of mountain bike trails around the world. Those ratings are then aggregated leading to an average or consensus rating for each trail. Such a rating would be difficult to compile without software and the distributed nature of the internet--yet another way technology is helping quantify MTB trails. In the end though, no amount of technology or group polling will ever fully quantify a mountain bike trail. Even if you could take things into account like scenery, tread, and the like, could a number ever really communicate what it's like to ride a mountain bike trail? It would be like trying to compare your friends--sure some friends are better than others but really they're just <em>different</em> and you like them each for different reasons. Instead of relying on a rating, why not get out and ride for yourself--you might just be surprised at what you find!
Culture
Riding across Asia on a mountain bike
Jan 10, 2008
<img align="left" alt="imagenibp.jpg" style="padding-right: 10px" id="image697" title="imagenibp.jpg" src="https://images.singletracks.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/imagenibp.jpg" />With the ongoing intersection of technology and mountain biking there have been some recent efforts to quantify and compare mountain bike trails. While the idea may sounds strange, some interesting progress has been made. The <a href="http://www.ibpindex.com/eng/index_i.asp">International Bike Parameters Index</a> (IBP Index) "is an index that values the difficulty of a mountain bike route or a road bike route" using GPS data collected on the bike. For example, you can upload your GPS data from a ride and the IBP Index will calculate things like distance and the grade along the route. I tried the index for a few rides with mixed results and I concluded the usefulness really depends on the quality of your GPS data. <a href="http://www.topofusion.com/">TopoFusion</a> includes two similar indices for GPS tracks, one called the "difficulty index," and the other the "effort index." While the numbers don't mean anything when taken by themselves, they are useful to compare across rides to get an idea of relative difficulty. Here on singletracks we've even <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/blog/?p=596">taken a stab</a> at quantifying the technical aspects of mountain biking. Using the IMBA trail difficulty rating system we give members the chance to rate the technical difficulty of mountain bike trails around the world. Those ratings are then aggregated leading to an average or consensus rating for each trail. Such a rating would be difficult to compile without software and the distributed nature of the internet--yet another way technology is helping quantify MTB trails. In the end though, no amount of technology or group polling will ever fully quantify a mountain bike trail. Even if you could take things into account like scenery, tread, and the like, could a number ever really communicate what it's like to ride a mountain bike trail? It would be like trying to compare your friends--sure some friends are better than others but really they're just <em>different</em> and you like them each for different reasons. Instead of relying on a rating, why not get out and ride for yourself--you might just be surprised at what you find!
Culture
Green mountain biking
Jan 9, 2008
  4
<img align="left" alt="imagenibp.jpg" style="padding-right: 10px" id="image697" title="imagenibp.jpg" src="https://images.singletracks.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/imagenibp.jpg" />With the ongoing intersection of technology and mountain biking there have been some recent efforts to quantify and compare mountain bike trails. While the idea may sounds strange, some interesting progress has been made. The <a href="http://www.ibpindex.com/eng/index_i.asp">International Bike Parameters Index</a> (IBP Index) "is an index that values the difficulty of a mountain bike route or a road bike route" using GPS data collected on the bike. For example, you can upload your GPS data from a ride and the IBP Index will calculate things like distance and the grade along the route. I tried the index for a few rides with mixed results and I concluded the usefulness really depends on the quality of your GPS data. <a href="http://www.topofusion.com/">TopoFusion</a> includes two similar indices for GPS tracks, one called the "difficulty index," and the other the "effort index." While the numbers don't mean anything when taken by themselves, they are useful to compare across rides to get an idea of relative difficulty. Here on singletracks we've even <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/blog/?p=596">taken a stab</a> at quantifying the technical aspects of mountain biking. Using the IMBA trail difficulty rating system we give members the chance to rate the technical difficulty of mountain bike trails around the world. Those ratings are then aggregated leading to an average or consensus rating for each trail. Such a rating would be difficult to compile without software and the distributed nature of the internet--yet another way technology is helping quantify MTB trails. In the end though, no amount of technology or group polling will ever fully quantify a mountain bike trail. Even if you could take things into account like scenery, tread, and the like, could a number ever really communicate what it's like to ride a mountain bike trail? It would be like trying to compare your friends--sure some friends are better than others but really they're just <em>different</em> and you like them each for different reasons. Instead of relying on a rating, why not get out and ride for yourself--you might just be surprised at what you find!
Community
Trips for Kids to Host Tenth Annual "Brews, Bikes and Bucks" Event
Jan 8, 2008
<img align="left" alt="imagenibp.jpg" style="padding-right: 10px" id="image697" title="imagenibp.jpg" src="https://images.singletracks.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/imagenibp.jpg" />With the ongoing intersection of technology and mountain biking there have been some recent efforts to quantify and compare mountain bike trails. While the idea may sounds strange, some interesting progress has been made. The <a href="http://www.ibpindex.com/eng/index_i.asp">International Bike Parameters Index</a> (IBP Index) "is an index that values the difficulty of a mountain bike route or a road bike route" using GPS data collected on the bike. For example, you can upload your GPS data from a ride and the IBP Index will calculate things like distance and the grade along the route. I tried the index for a few rides with mixed results and I concluded the usefulness really depends on the quality of your GPS data. <a href="http://www.topofusion.com/">TopoFusion</a> includes two similar indices for GPS tracks, one called the "difficulty index," and the other the "effort index." While the numbers don't mean anything when taken by themselves, they are useful to compare across rides to get an idea of relative difficulty. Here on singletracks we've even <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/blog/?p=596">taken a stab</a> at quantifying the technical aspects of mountain biking. Using the IMBA trail difficulty rating system we give members the chance to rate the technical difficulty of mountain bike trails around the world. Those ratings are then aggregated leading to an average or consensus rating for each trail. Such a rating would be difficult to compile without software and the distributed nature of the internet--yet another way technology is helping quantify MTB trails. In the end though, no amount of technology or group polling will ever fully quantify a mountain bike trail. Even if you could take things into account like scenery, tread, and the like, could a number ever really communicate what it's like to ride a mountain bike trail? It would be like trying to compare your friends--sure some friends are better than others but really they're just <em>different</em> and you like them each for different reasons. Instead of relying on a rating, why not get out and ride for yourself--you might just be surprised at what you find!
MTB Tips
Setting goals: Epic rides in 2008
Jan 7, 2008
  2
<img align="left" alt="imagenibp.jpg" style="padding-right: 10px" id="image697" title="imagenibp.jpg" src="https://images.singletracks.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/imagenibp.jpg" />With the ongoing intersection of technology and mountain biking there have been some recent efforts to quantify and compare mountain bike trails. While the idea may sounds strange, some interesting progress has been made. The <a href="http://www.ibpindex.com/eng/index_i.asp">International Bike Parameters Index</a> (IBP Index) "is an index that values the difficulty of a mountain bike route or a road bike route" using GPS data collected on the bike. For example, you can upload your GPS data from a ride and the IBP Index will calculate things like distance and the grade along the route. I tried the index for a few rides with mixed results and I concluded the usefulness really depends on the quality of your GPS data. <a href="http://www.topofusion.com/">TopoFusion</a> includes two similar indices for GPS tracks, one called the "difficulty index," and the other the "effort index." While the numbers don't mean anything when taken by themselves, they are useful to compare across rides to get an idea of relative difficulty. Here on singletracks we've even <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/blog/?p=596">taken a stab</a> at quantifying the technical aspects of mountain biking. Using the IMBA trail difficulty rating system we give members the chance to rate the technical difficulty of mountain bike trails around the world. Those ratings are then aggregated leading to an average or consensus rating for each trail. Such a rating would be difficult to compile without software and the distributed nature of the internet--yet another way technology is helping quantify MTB trails. In the end though, no amount of technology or group polling will ever fully quantify a mountain bike trail. Even if you could take things into account like scenery, tread, and the like, could a number ever really communicate what it's like to ride a mountain bike trail? It would be like trying to compare your friends--sure some friends are better than others but really they're just <em>different</em> and you like them each for different reasons. Instead of relying on a rating, why not get out and ride for yourself--you might just be surprised at what you find!
Culture
Vacuum-sealed MTB shoes AND riding at night without lights
Jan 4, 2008
  1
Retro mobile phone graphic beside the word "GO" in bold, stylized font, conveying a sense of action or movement.
Culture
Find a trail, buy a helmet - On your phone!
Jan 3, 2008
  1
A winding dirt path through a forest, surrounded by trees and dense foliage. The ground is covered with fallen leaves, and sunlight filters through the branches, casting shadows along the trail. The path leads into the distance, inviting exploration.
Mountain Bike Trails
Stonewall Falls Ride Report
Jan 2, 2008
  2
<img align="left" alt="imagenibp.jpg" style="padding-right: 10px" id="image697" title="imagenibp.jpg" src="https://images.singletracks.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/imagenibp.jpg" />With the ongoing intersection of technology and mountain biking there have been some recent efforts to quantify and compare mountain bike trails. While the idea may sounds strange, some interesting progress has been made. The <a href="http://www.ibpindex.com/eng/index_i.asp">International Bike Parameters Index</a> (IBP Index) "is an index that values the difficulty of a mountain bike route or a road bike route" using GPS data collected on the bike. For example, you can upload your GPS data from a ride and the IBP Index will calculate things like distance and the grade along the route. I tried the index for a few rides with mixed results and I concluded the usefulness really depends on the quality of your GPS data. <a href="http://www.topofusion.com/">TopoFusion</a> includes two similar indices for GPS tracks, one called the "difficulty index," and the other the "effort index." While the numbers don't mean anything when taken by themselves, they are useful to compare across rides to get an idea of relative difficulty. Here on singletracks we've even <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/blog/?p=596">taken a stab</a> at quantifying the technical aspects of mountain biking. Using the IMBA trail difficulty rating system we give members the chance to rate the technical difficulty of mountain bike trails around the world. Those ratings are then aggregated leading to an average or consensus rating for each trail. Such a rating would be difficult to compile without software and the distributed nature of the internet--yet another way technology is helping quantify MTB trails. In the end though, no amount of technology or group polling will ever fully quantify a mountain bike trail. Even if you could take things into account like scenery, tread, and the like, could a number ever really communicate what it's like to ride a mountain bike trail? It would be like trying to compare your friends--sure some friends are better than others but really they're just <em>different</em> and you like them each for different reasons. Instead of relying on a rating, why not get out and ride for yourself--you might just be surprised at what you find!
Culture
All-Wheel-Drive MTB
Dec 31, 2007
A magazine advertisement showcasing the Bridgestone Almost Custom MB-4 bicycle. The image features a cyclist wearing a red shirt and helmet, riding on a wooded path. The ad includes text promoting the bike’s quality and affordability, alongside the Bridgestone logo.
Mountain Bikes and Gear
Bike from the dead
Dec 31, 2007
  2
<img align="left" alt="imagenibp.jpg" style="padding-right: 10px" id="image697" title="imagenibp.jpg" src="https://images.singletracks.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/imagenibp.jpg" />With the ongoing intersection of technology and mountain biking there have been some recent efforts to quantify and compare mountain bike trails. While the idea may sounds strange, some interesting progress has been made. The <a href="http://www.ibpindex.com/eng/index_i.asp">International Bike Parameters Index</a> (IBP Index) "is an index that values the difficulty of a mountain bike route or a road bike route" using GPS data collected on the bike. For example, you can upload your GPS data from a ride and the IBP Index will calculate things like distance and the grade along the route. I tried the index for a few rides with mixed results and I concluded the usefulness really depends on the quality of your GPS data. <a href="http://www.topofusion.com/">TopoFusion</a> includes two similar indices for GPS tracks, one called the "difficulty index," and the other the "effort index." While the numbers don't mean anything when taken by themselves, they are useful to compare across rides to get an idea of relative difficulty. Here on singletracks we've even <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/blog/?p=596">taken a stab</a> at quantifying the technical aspects of mountain biking. Using the IMBA trail difficulty rating system we give members the chance to rate the technical difficulty of mountain bike trails around the world. Those ratings are then aggregated leading to an average or consensus rating for each trail. Such a rating would be difficult to compile without software and the distributed nature of the internet--yet another way technology is helping quantify MTB trails. In the end though, no amount of technology or group polling will ever fully quantify a mountain bike trail. Even if you could take things into account like scenery, tread, and the like, could a number ever really communicate what it's like to ride a mountain bike trail? It would be like trying to compare your friends--sure some friends are better than others but really they're just <em>different</em> and you like them each for different reasons. Instead of relying on a rating, why not get out and ride for yourself--you might just be surprised at what you find!
Community
Ski-Slope DH Racing
Dec 31, 2007
<img align="left" alt="imagenibp.jpg" style="padding-right: 10px" id="image697" title="imagenibp.jpg" src="https://images.singletracks.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/imagenibp.jpg" />With the ongoing intersection of technology and mountain biking there have been some recent efforts to quantify and compare mountain bike trails. While the idea may sounds strange, some interesting progress has been made. The <a href="http://www.ibpindex.com/eng/index_i.asp">International Bike Parameters Index</a> (IBP Index) "is an index that values the difficulty of a mountain bike route or a road bike route" using GPS data collected on the bike. For example, you can upload your GPS data from a ride and the IBP Index will calculate things like distance and the grade along the route. I tried the index for a few rides with mixed results and I concluded the usefulness really depends on the quality of your GPS data. <a href="http://www.topofusion.com/">TopoFusion</a> includes two similar indices for GPS tracks, one called the "difficulty index," and the other the "effort index." While the numbers don't mean anything when taken by themselves, they are useful to compare across rides to get an idea of relative difficulty. Here on singletracks we've even <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/blog/?p=596">taken a stab</a> at quantifying the technical aspects of mountain biking. Using the IMBA trail difficulty rating system we give members the chance to rate the technical difficulty of mountain bike trails around the world. Those ratings are then aggregated leading to an average or consensus rating for each trail. Such a rating would be difficult to compile without software and the distributed nature of the internet--yet another way technology is helping quantify MTB trails. In the end though, no amount of technology or group polling will ever fully quantify a mountain bike trail. Even if you could take things into account like scenery, tread, and the like, could a number ever really communicate what it's like to ride a mountain bike trail? It would be like trying to compare your friends--sure some friends are better than others but really they're just <em>different</em> and you like them each for different reasons. Instead of relying on a rating, why not get out and ride for yourself--you might just be surprised at what you find!
Culture
Mountainbike Wheel-size, & the Right One for you
Dec 29, 2007
A mountain biker in a blue outfit leans into a turn on a dirt trail, showcasing dynamic movement on a rocky path. In the background, spectators watch from the sidelines amidst a forested setting.
Community
MTB Predictions for 2008
Dec 28, 2007
  1
Community
Mountain biking in 2007: A review
Dec 26, 2007
Image alt text: Promotional poster for the Baja Epic Mountain Bike Race, scheduled for November 5-8, 2008, in Baja California, Mexico. The poster features an athlete on a bicycle with the number 608 displayed on the bike.
Community
Baja Epic Multi-stage Mountain Bike Race
Dec 24, 2007
Close-up view of a bicycle handlebar with a digital cycling computer mounted on it, displaying speed and distance metrics on a screen. The device is secured with rubber straps and features a sleek design.
Mountain Bikes and Gear
Rear-view camera for your bike
Dec 21, 2007
Two mountain bikers riding along a dirt path surrounded by greenery. One rider is wearing a blue jersey and white shorts, while the other is further up the path in a black shirt. There are signs and foliage lining the trail.
MTB Tips
Mountain biking for fitness in 2008
Dec 20, 2007
  1
<img align="left" alt="imagenibp.jpg" style="padding-right: 10px" id="image697" title="imagenibp.jpg" src="https://images.singletracks.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/imagenibp.jpg" />With the ongoing intersection of technology and mountain biking there have been some recent efforts to quantify and compare mountain bike trails. While the idea may sounds strange, some interesting progress has been made. The <a href="http://www.ibpindex.com/eng/index_i.asp">International Bike Parameters Index</a> (IBP Index) "is an index that values the difficulty of a mountain bike route or a road bike route" using GPS data collected on the bike. For example, you can upload your GPS data from a ride and the IBP Index will calculate things like distance and the grade along the route. I tried the index for a few rides with mixed results and I concluded the usefulness really depends on the quality of your GPS data. <a href="http://www.topofusion.com/">TopoFusion</a> includes two similar indices for GPS tracks, one called the "difficulty index," and the other the "effort index." While the numbers don't mean anything when taken by themselves, they are useful to compare across rides to get an idea of relative difficulty. Here on singletracks we've even <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/blog/?p=596">taken a stab</a> at quantifying the technical aspects of mountain biking. Using the IMBA trail difficulty rating system we give members the chance to rate the technical difficulty of mountain bike trails around the world. Those ratings are then aggregated leading to an average or consensus rating for each trail. Such a rating would be difficult to compile without software and the distributed nature of the internet--yet another way technology is helping quantify MTB trails. In the end though, no amount of technology or group polling will ever fully quantify a mountain bike trail. Even if you could take things into account like scenery, tread, and the like, could a number ever really communicate what it's like to ride a mountain bike trail? It would be like trying to compare your friends--sure some friends are better than others but really they're just <em>different</em> and you like them each for different reasons. Instead of relying on a rating, why not get out and ride for yourself--you might just be surprised at what you find!
Culture
The fastest accepted fad in the MTB world.
Dec 20, 2007
  1
Close-up view of a damaged computer motherboard showing burn marks and melted components. Wires appear singed, and blackened residue is present around the area of damage.
Community
Singletracks is all better now
Dec 20, 2007
A person riding a mountain bike on a dirt trail. They are wearing a helmet, sunglasses, and a dark jacket, with shorts and gloves. The background features dry grass and trees, indicating an outdoor setting.
Culture
Ride along with the Prez
Dec 19, 2007
<img align="left" alt="imagenibp.jpg" style="padding-right: 10px" id="image697" title="imagenibp.jpg" src="https://images.singletracks.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/imagenibp.jpg" />With the ongoing intersection of technology and mountain biking there have been some recent efforts to quantify and compare mountain bike trails. While the idea may sounds strange, some interesting progress has been made. The <a href="http://www.ibpindex.com/eng/index_i.asp">International Bike Parameters Index</a> (IBP Index) "is an index that values the difficulty of a mountain bike route or a road bike route" using GPS data collected on the bike. For example, you can upload your GPS data from a ride and the IBP Index will calculate things like distance and the grade along the route. I tried the index for a few rides with mixed results and I concluded the usefulness really depends on the quality of your GPS data. <a href="http://www.topofusion.com/">TopoFusion</a> includes two similar indices for GPS tracks, one called the "difficulty index," and the other the "effort index." While the numbers don't mean anything when taken by themselves, they are useful to compare across rides to get an idea of relative difficulty. Here on singletracks we've even <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/blog/?p=596">taken a stab</a> at quantifying the technical aspects of mountain biking. Using the IMBA trail difficulty rating system we give members the chance to rate the technical difficulty of mountain bike trails around the world. Those ratings are then aggregated leading to an average or consensus rating for each trail. Such a rating would be difficult to compile without software and the distributed nature of the internet--yet another way technology is helping quantify MTB trails. In the end though, no amount of technology or group polling will ever fully quantify a mountain bike trail. Even if you could take things into account like scenery, tread, and the like, could a number ever really communicate what it's like to ride a mountain bike trail? It would be like trying to compare your friends--sure some friends are better than others but really they're just <em>different</em> and you like them each for different reasons. Instead of relying on a rating, why not get out and ride for yourself--you might just be surprised at what you find!
Culture
SF mountain biker finalist for National Hero Award
Dec 18, 2007
A large hillside with the letters "LU" prominently displayed in white and burgundy, surrounded by lush green trees under a bright sky.
Mountain Bike Trails
Liberty University to develop mountain bike trails
Dec 14, 2007
<img align="left" alt="imagenibp.jpg" style="padding-right: 10px" id="image697" title="imagenibp.jpg" src="https://images.singletracks.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/imagenibp.jpg" />With the ongoing intersection of technology and mountain biking there have been some recent efforts to quantify and compare mountain bike trails. While the idea may sounds strange, some interesting progress has been made. The <a href="http://www.ibpindex.com/eng/index_i.asp">International Bike Parameters Index</a> (IBP Index) "is an index that values the difficulty of a mountain bike route or a road bike route" using GPS data collected on the bike. For example, you can upload your GPS data from a ride and the IBP Index will calculate things like distance and the grade along the route. I tried the index for a few rides with mixed results and I concluded the usefulness really depends on the quality of your GPS data. <a href="http://www.topofusion.com/">TopoFusion</a> includes two similar indices for GPS tracks, one called the "difficulty index," and the other the "effort index." While the numbers don't mean anything when taken by themselves, they are useful to compare across rides to get an idea of relative difficulty. Here on singletracks we've even <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/blog/?p=596">taken a stab</a> at quantifying the technical aspects of mountain biking. Using the IMBA trail difficulty rating system we give members the chance to rate the technical difficulty of mountain bike trails around the world. Those ratings are then aggregated leading to an average or consensus rating for each trail. Such a rating would be difficult to compile without software and the distributed nature of the internet--yet another way technology is helping quantify MTB trails. In the end though, no amount of technology or group polling will ever fully quantify a mountain bike trail. Even if you could take things into account like scenery, tread, and the like, could a number ever really communicate what it's like to ride a mountain bike trail? It would be like trying to compare your friends--sure some friends are better than others but really they're just <em>different</em> and you like them each for different reasons. Instead of relying on a rating, why not get out and ride for yourself--you might just be surprised at what you find!
Mountain Bike Trails
No such thing as a Free Lunch - until now!
Dec 12, 2007
A man sitting on a rocky surface under a bridge, wearing a red sweatshirt and gray pants, with a blue bicycle leaning against a wall beside him.
Culture
Bike shop helps out homeless man with new mountain bike
Dec 11, 2007
<img align="left" alt="imagenibp.jpg" style="padding-right: 10px" id="image697" title="imagenibp.jpg" src="https://images.singletracks.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/imagenibp.jpg" />With the ongoing intersection of technology and mountain biking there have been some recent efforts to quantify and compare mountain bike trails. While the idea may sounds strange, some interesting progress has been made. The <a href="http://www.ibpindex.com/eng/index_i.asp">International Bike Parameters Index</a> (IBP Index) "is an index that values the difficulty of a mountain bike route or a road bike route" using GPS data collected on the bike. For example, you can upload your GPS data from a ride and the IBP Index will calculate things like distance and the grade along the route. I tried the index for a few rides with mixed results and I concluded the usefulness really depends on the quality of your GPS data. <a href="http://www.topofusion.com/">TopoFusion</a> includes two similar indices for GPS tracks, one called the "difficulty index," and the other the "effort index." While the numbers don't mean anything when taken by themselves, they are useful to compare across rides to get an idea of relative difficulty. Here on singletracks we've even <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/blog/?p=596">taken a stab</a> at quantifying the technical aspects of mountain biking. Using the IMBA trail difficulty rating system we give members the chance to rate the technical difficulty of mountain bike trails around the world. Those ratings are then aggregated leading to an average or consensus rating for each trail. Such a rating would be difficult to compile without software and the distributed nature of the internet--yet another way technology is helping quantify MTB trails. In the end though, no amount of technology or group polling will ever fully quantify a mountain bike trail. Even if you could take things into account like scenery, tread, and the like, could a number ever really communicate what it's like to ride a mountain bike trail? It would be like trying to compare your friends--sure some friends are better than others but really they're just <em>different</em> and you like them each for different reasons. Instead of relying on a rating, why not get out and ride for yourself--you might just be surprised at what you find!
Culture
Mountain Biking: A second coming
Dec 10, 2007
  2
<img align="left" alt="imagenibp.jpg" style="padding-right: 10px" id="image697" title="imagenibp.jpg" src="https://images.singletracks.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/imagenibp.jpg" />With the ongoing intersection of technology and mountain biking there have been some recent efforts to quantify and compare mountain bike trails. While the idea may sounds strange, some interesting progress has been made. The <a href="http://www.ibpindex.com/eng/index_i.asp">International Bike Parameters Index</a> (IBP Index) "is an index that values the difficulty of a mountain bike route or a road bike route" using GPS data collected on the bike. For example, you can upload your GPS data from a ride and the IBP Index will calculate things like distance and the grade along the route. I tried the index for a few rides with mixed results and I concluded the usefulness really depends on the quality of your GPS data. <a href="http://www.topofusion.com/">TopoFusion</a> includes two similar indices for GPS tracks, one called the "difficulty index," and the other the "effort index." While the numbers don't mean anything when taken by themselves, they are useful to compare across rides to get an idea of relative difficulty. Here on singletracks we've even <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/blog/?p=596">taken a stab</a> at quantifying the technical aspects of mountain biking. Using the IMBA trail difficulty rating system we give members the chance to rate the technical difficulty of mountain bike trails around the world. Those ratings are then aggregated leading to an average or consensus rating for each trail. Such a rating would be difficult to compile without software and the distributed nature of the internet--yet another way technology is helping quantify MTB trails. In the end though, no amount of technology or group polling will ever fully quantify a mountain bike trail. Even if you could take things into account like scenery, tread, and the like, could a number ever really communicate what it's like to ride a mountain bike trail? It would be like trying to compare your friends--sure some friends are better than others but really they're just <em>different</em> and you like them each for different reasons. Instead of relying on a rating, why not get out and ride for yourself--you might just be surprised at what you find!
Mountain Bikes and Gear
Internal Drivetrains for Mountainbikes?
Dec 8, 2007
  1
<img align="left" alt="imagenibp.jpg" style="padding-right: 10px" id="image697" title="imagenibp.jpg" src="https://images.singletracks.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/imagenibp.jpg" />With the ongoing intersection of technology and mountain biking there have been some recent efforts to quantify and compare mountain bike trails. While the idea may sounds strange, some interesting progress has been made. The <a href="http://www.ibpindex.com/eng/index_i.asp">International Bike Parameters Index</a> (IBP Index) "is an index that values the difficulty of a mountain bike route or a road bike route" using GPS data collected on the bike. For example, you can upload your GPS data from a ride and the IBP Index will calculate things like distance and the grade along the route. I tried the index for a few rides with mixed results and I concluded the usefulness really depends on the quality of your GPS data. <a href="http://www.topofusion.com/">TopoFusion</a> includes two similar indices for GPS tracks, one called the "difficulty index," and the other the "effort index." While the numbers don't mean anything when taken by themselves, they are useful to compare across rides to get an idea of relative difficulty. Here on singletracks we've even <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/blog/?p=596">taken a stab</a> at quantifying the technical aspects of mountain biking. Using the IMBA trail difficulty rating system we give members the chance to rate the technical difficulty of mountain bike trails around the world. Those ratings are then aggregated leading to an average or consensus rating for each trail. Such a rating would be difficult to compile without software and the distributed nature of the internet--yet another way technology is helping quantify MTB trails. In the end though, no amount of technology or group polling will ever fully quantify a mountain bike trail. Even if you could take things into account like scenery, tread, and the like, could a number ever really communicate what it's like to ride a mountain bike trail? It would be like trying to compare your friends--sure some friends are better than others but really they're just <em>different</em> and you like them each for different reasons. Instead of relying on a rating, why not get out and ride for yourself--you might just be surprised at what you find!
Culture
California wildfires impact bike companies
Dec 7, 2007
A blue and black mountain bike with a modern design, featuring front suspension, disc brakes, and a gear system. The bike is positioned against a white background, highlighting its sleek frame and components.
Mountain Bikes and Gear
3 of the best mountain bikes?
Dec 7, 2007