Latest mountain bike news

The guys over at <a href="http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/11/05/do-you-live-on-the-east-coast/">BlueCollarMTB.com posted a complaint</a> a couple days ago about the 2008 National Mountain Bike Series calendar and the fact that only 1 out of the 6 events is on the East Coast of the US. Disappointing? A bit. Surprising? No.

In fact I'm more surprised that Idaho gets a stop on the National Mountain Bike Series. I mean, I'm sure the riding is incredible there but there just isn't a lot of nearby population to draw for the event. I'm also surprised that Colorado gets the shaft, though Park City, UT is just a 7 hour drive away from Denver ;) California gets 2 stops but they have a pretty good track record for getting folks out for big events (anyone ever hear of <a href="http://www.seaotterclassic.com/">Sea Otter</a>?).

So where are all the mountain bikers? While the east coast may have a large population, the truth is not many of us are riders out here compared to the west. For example, here is where our registered members call home:

1. California (6,157)

2. Colorado (5,296)

3. Georgia (2,788 and our home state)

4. North Carolina (2,702 and our previous home)

5. Virginia (1,890)

So yeah, 3 of the top 5 states (for singletracks users anyway) are on the east coast but add them all up and you barely beat California. Mountain biking is just more popular per capita in the west where land managers are more accommodating and the population is younger. So let the big mega events go to California and the west - most of us east coasters enjoy smaller, more selective <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/mountain-bike/events/events.php?eventType=all&timeframe=all&location=all">MTB events</a> anyway ;)
A mountain biker riding down stone steps near a historic archway, surrounded by large rocks and ancient stone walls. The scene is set against a clear sky, highlighting the cyclist's action.
The guys over at <a href="http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/11/05/do-you-live-on-the-east-coast/">BlueCollarMTB.com posted a complaint</a> a couple days ago about the 2008 National Mountain Bike Series calendar and the fact that only 1 out of the 6 events is on the East Coast of the US. Disappointing? A bit. Surprising? No.

In fact I'm more surprised that Idaho gets a stop on the National Mountain Bike Series. I mean, I'm sure the riding is incredible there but there just isn't a lot of nearby population to draw for the event. I'm also surprised that Colorado gets the shaft, though Park City, UT is just a 7 hour drive away from Denver ;) California gets 2 stops but they have a pretty good track record for getting folks out for big events (anyone ever hear of <a href="http://www.seaotterclassic.com/">Sea Otter</a>?).

So where are all the mountain bikers? While the east coast may have a large population, the truth is not many of us are riders out here compared to the west. For example, here is where our registered members call home:

1. California (6,157)

2. Colorado (5,296)

3. Georgia (2,788 and our home state)

4. North Carolina (2,702 and our previous home)

5. Virginia (1,890)

So yeah, 3 of the top 5 states (for singletracks users anyway) are on the east coast but add them all up and you barely beat California. Mountain biking is just more popular per capita in the west where land managers are more accommodating and the population is younger. So let the big mega events go to California and the west - most of us east coasters enjoy smaller, more selective <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/mountain-bike/events/events.php?eventType=all&timeframe=all&location=all">MTB events</a> anyway ;)
The guys over at <a href="http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/11/05/do-you-live-on-the-east-coast/">BlueCollarMTB.com posted a complaint</a> a couple days ago about the 2008 National Mountain Bike Series calendar and the fact that only 1 out of the 6 events is on the East Coast of the US. Disappointing? A bit. Surprising? No.

In fact I'm more surprised that Idaho gets a stop on the National Mountain Bike Series. I mean, I'm sure the riding is incredible there but there just isn't a lot of nearby population to draw for the event. I'm also surprised that Colorado gets the shaft, though Park City, UT is just a 7 hour drive away from Denver ;) California gets 2 stops but they have a pretty good track record for getting folks out for big events (anyone ever hear of <a href="http://www.seaotterclassic.com/">Sea Otter</a>?).

So where are all the mountain bikers? While the east coast may have a large population, the truth is not many of us are riders out here compared to the west. For example, here is where our registered members call home:

1. California (6,157)

2. Colorado (5,296)

3. Georgia (2,788 and our home state)

4. North Carolina (2,702 and our previous home)

5. Virginia (1,890)

So yeah, 3 of the top 5 states (for singletracks users anyway) are on the east coast but add them all up and you barely beat California. Mountain biking is just more popular per capita in the west where land managers are more accommodating and the population is younger. So let the big mega events go to California and the west - most of us east coasters enjoy smaller, more selective <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/mountain-bike/events/events.php?eventType=all&timeframe=all&location=all">MTB events</a> anyway ;)
The guys over at <a href="http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/11/05/do-you-live-on-the-east-coast/">BlueCollarMTB.com posted a complaint</a> a couple days ago about the 2008 National Mountain Bike Series calendar and the fact that only 1 out of the 6 events is on the East Coast of the US. Disappointing? A bit. Surprising? No.

In fact I'm more surprised that Idaho gets a stop on the National Mountain Bike Series. I mean, I'm sure the riding is incredible there but there just isn't a lot of nearby population to draw for the event. I'm also surprised that Colorado gets the shaft, though Park City, UT is just a 7 hour drive away from Denver ;) California gets 2 stops but they have a pretty good track record for getting folks out for big events (anyone ever hear of <a href="http://www.seaotterclassic.com/">Sea Otter</a>?).

So where are all the mountain bikers? While the east coast may have a large population, the truth is not many of us are riders out here compared to the west. For example, here is where our registered members call home:

1. California (6,157)

2. Colorado (5,296)

3. Georgia (2,788 and our home state)

4. North Carolina (2,702 and our previous home)

5. Virginia (1,890)

So yeah, 3 of the top 5 states (for singletracks users anyway) are on the east coast but add them all up and you barely beat California. Mountain biking is just more popular per capita in the west where land managers are more accommodating and the population is younger. So let the big mega events go to California and the west - most of us east coasters enjoy smaller, more selective <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/mountain-bike/events/events.php?eventType=all&timeframe=all&location=all">MTB events</a> anyway ;)
Close-up image of a black insect, commonly referred to as a stinkbug or clown beetle, positioned on a surface of small gravel or dirt. The insect is shown from a top-down angle, highlighting its distinct body shape and long antennae.
  2
The guys over at <a href="http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/11/05/do-you-live-on-the-east-coast/">BlueCollarMTB.com posted a complaint</a> a couple days ago about the 2008 National Mountain Bike Series calendar and the fact that only 1 out of the 6 events is on the East Coast of the US. Disappointing? A bit. Surprising? No.

In fact I'm more surprised that Idaho gets a stop on the National Mountain Bike Series. I mean, I'm sure the riding is incredible there but there just isn't a lot of nearby population to draw for the event. I'm also surprised that Colorado gets the shaft, though Park City, UT is just a 7 hour drive away from Denver ;) California gets 2 stops but they have a pretty good track record for getting folks out for big events (anyone ever hear of <a href="http://www.seaotterclassic.com/">Sea Otter</a>?).

So where are all the mountain bikers? While the east coast may have a large population, the truth is not many of us are riders out here compared to the west. For example, here is where our registered members call home:

1. California (6,157)

2. Colorado (5,296)

3. Georgia (2,788 and our home state)

4. North Carolina (2,702 and our previous home)

5. Virginia (1,890)

So yeah, 3 of the top 5 states (for singletracks users anyway) are on the east coast but add them all up and you barely beat California. Mountain biking is just more popular per capita in the west where land managers are more accommodating and the population is younger. So let the big mega events go to California and the west - most of us east coasters enjoy smaller, more selective <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/mountain-bike/events/events.php?eventType=all&timeframe=all&location=all">MTB events</a> anyway ;)
  3
An illustration featuring a cyclist in an unusual position, riding a bicycle with a skeletal spine incorporated into their body. The background is green, and the text "Riding the SPINE" is displayed in a stylized font above the figure.
  1
The guys over at <a href="http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/11/05/do-you-live-on-the-east-coast/">BlueCollarMTB.com posted a complaint</a> a couple days ago about the 2008 National Mountain Bike Series calendar and the fact that only 1 out of the 6 events is on the East Coast of the US. Disappointing? A bit. Surprising? No.

In fact I'm more surprised that Idaho gets a stop on the National Mountain Bike Series. I mean, I'm sure the riding is incredible there but there just isn't a lot of nearby population to draw for the event. I'm also surprised that Colorado gets the shaft, though Park City, UT is just a 7 hour drive away from Denver ;) California gets 2 stops but they have a pretty good track record for getting folks out for big events (anyone ever hear of <a href="http://www.seaotterclassic.com/">Sea Otter</a>?).

So where are all the mountain bikers? While the east coast may have a large population, the truth is not many of us are riders out here compared to the west. For example, here is where our registered members call home:

1. California (6,157)

2. Colorado (5,296)

3. Georgia (2,788 and our home state)

4. North Carolina (2,702 and our previous home)

5. Virginia (1,890)

So yeah, 3 of the top 5 states (for singletracks users anyway) are on the east coast but add them all up and you barely beat California. Mountain biking is just more popular per capita in the west where land managers are more accommodating and the population is younger. So let the big mega events go to California and the west - most of us east coasters enjoy smaller, more selective <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/mountain-bike/events/events.php?eventType=all&timeframe=all&location=all">MTB events</a> anyway ;)
The guys over at <a href="http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/11/05/do-you-live-on-the-east-coast/">BlueCollarMTB.com posted a complaint</a> a couple days ago about the 2008 National Mountain Bike Series calendar and the fact that only 1 out of the 6 events is on the East Coast of the US. Disappointing? A bit. Surprising? No.

In fact I'm more surprised that Idaho gets a stop on the National Mountain Bike Series. I mean, I'm sure the riding is incredible there but there just isn't a lot of nearby population to draw for the event. I'm also surprised that Colorado gets the shaft, though Park City, UT is just a 7 hour drive away from Denver ;) California gets 2 stops but they have a pretty good track record for getting folks out for big events (anyone ever hear of <a href="http://www.seaotterclassic.com/">Sea Otter</a>?).

So where are all the mountain bikers? While the east coast may have a large population, the truth is not many of us are riders out here compared to the west. For example, here is where our registered members call home:

1. California (6,157)

2. Colorado (5,296)

3. Georgia (2,788 and our home state)

4. North Carolina (2,702 and our previous home)

5. Virginia (1,890)

So yeah, 3 of the top 5 states (for singletracks users anyway) are on the east coast but add them all up and you barely beat California. Mountain biking is just more popular per capita in the west where land managers are more accommodating and the population is younger. So let the big mega events go to California and the west - most of us east coasters enjoy smaller, more selective <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/mountain-bike/events/events.php?eventType=all&timeframe=all&location=all">MTB events</a> anyway ;)
A Garmin Edge 605 GPS device displaying a map with speed and heading information, featuring a gray casing and a black screen with navigation details.
The guys over at <a href="http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/11/05/do-you-live-on-the-east-coast/">BlueCollarMTB.com posted a complaint</a> a couple days ago about the 2008 National Mountain Bike Series calendar and the fact that only 1 out of the 6 events is on the East Coast of the US. Disappointing? A bit. Surprising? No.

In fact I'm more surprised that Idaho gets a stop on the National Mountain Bike Series. I mean, I'm sure the riding is incredible there but there just isn't a lot of nearby population to draw for the event. I'm also surprised that Colorado gets the shaft, though Park City, UT is just a 7 hour drive away from Denver ;) California gets 2 stops but they have a pretty good track record for getting folks out for big events (anyone ever hear of <a href="http://www.seaotterclassic.com/">Sea Otter</a>?).

So where are all the mountain bikers? While the east coast may have a large population, the truth is not many of us are riders out here compared to the west. For example, here is where our registered members call home:

1. California (6,157)

2. Colorado (5,296)

3. Georgia (2,788 and our home state)

4. North Carolina (2,702 and our previous home)

5. Virginia (1,890)

So yeah, 3 of the top 5 states (for singletracks users anyway) are on the east coast but add them all up and you barely beat California. Mountain biking is just more popular per capita in the west where land managers are more accommodating and the population is younger. So let the big mega events go to California and the west - most of us east coasters enjoy smaller, more selective <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/mountain-bike/events/events.php?eventType=all&timeframe=all&location=all">MTB events</a> anyway ;)
The guys over at <a href="http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/11/05/do-you-live-on-the-east-coast/">BlueCollarMTB.com posted a complaint</a> a couple days ago about the 2008 National Mountain Bike Series calendar and the fact that only 1 out of the 6 events is on the East Coast of the US. Disappointing? A bit. Surprising? No.

In fact I'm more surprised that Idaho gets a stop on the National Mountain Bike Series. I mean, I'm sure the riding is incredible there but there just isn't a lot of nearby population to draw for the event. I'm also surprised that Colorado gets the shaft, though Park City, UT is just a 7 hour drive away from Denver ;) California gets 2 stops but they have a pretty good track record for getting folks out for big events (anyone ever hear of <a href="http://www.seaotterclassic.com/">Sea Otter</a>?).

So where are all the mountain bikers? While the east coast may have a large population, the truth is not many of us are riders out here compared to the west. For example, here is where our registered members call home:

1. California (6,157)

2. Colorado (5,296)

3. Georgia (2,788 and our home state)

4. North Carolina (2,702 and our previous home)

5. Virginia (1,890)

So yeah, 3 of the top 5 states (for singletracks users anyway) are on the east coast but add them all up and you barely beat California. Mountain biking is just more popular per capita in the west where land managers are more accommodating and the population is younger. So let the big mega events go to California and the west - most of us east coasters enjoy smaller, more selective <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/mountain-bike/events/events.php?eventType=all&timeframe=all&location=all">MTB events</a> anyway ;)
The guys over at <a href="http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/11/05/do-you-live-on-the-east-coast/">BlueCollarMTB.com posted a complaint</a> a couple days ago about the 2008 National Mountain Bike Series calendar and the fact that only 1 out of the 6 events is on the East Coast of the US. Disappointing? A bit. Surprising? No.

In fact I'm more surprised that Idaho gets a stop on the National Mountain Bike Series. I mean, I'm sure the riding is incredible there but there just isn't a lot of nearby population to draw for the event. I'm also surprised that Colorado gets the shaft, though Park City, UT is just a 7 hour drive away from Denver ;) California gets 2 stops but they have a pretty good track record for getting folks out for big events (anyone ever hear of <a href="http://www.seaotterclassic.com/">Sea Otter</a>?).

So where are all the mountain bikers? While the east coast may have a large population, the truth is not many of us are riders out here compared to the west. For example, here is where our registered members call home:

1. California (6,157)

2. Colorado (5,296)

3. Georgia (2,788 and our home state)

4. North Carolina (2,702 and our previous home)

5. Virginia (1,890)

So yeah, 3 of the top 5 states (for singletracks users anyway) are on the east coast but add them all up and you barely beat California. Mountain biking is just more popular per capita in the west where land managers are more accommodating and the population is younger. So let the big mega events go to California and the west - most of us east coasters enjoy smaller, more selective <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/mountain-bike/events/events.php?eventType=all&timeframe=all&location=all">MTB events</a> anyway ;)
A red and silver mountain bike with wide tires, front suspension, and disc brakes, positioned on a white background.
The guys over at <a href="http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/11/05/do-you-live-on-the-east-coast/">BlueCollarMTB.com posted a complaint</a> a couple days ago about the 2008 National Mountain Bike Series calendar and the fact that only 1 out of the 6 events is on the East Coast of the US. Disappointing? A bit. Surprising? No.

In fact I'm more surprised that Idaho gets a stop on the National Mountain Bike Series. I mean, I'm sure the riding is incredible there but there just isn't a lot of nearby population to draw for the event. I'm also surprised that Colorado gets the shaft, though Park City, UT is just a 7 hour drive away from Denver ;) California gets 2 stops but they have a pretty good track record for getting folks out for big events (anyone ever hear of <a href="http://www.seaotterclassic.com/">Sea Otter</a>?).

So where are all the mountain bikers? While the east coast may have a large population, the truth is not many of us are riders out here compared to the west. For example, here is where our registered members call home:

1. California (6,157)

2. Colorado (5,296)

3. Georgia (2,788 and our home state)

4. North Carolina (2,702 and our previous home)

5. Virginia (1,890)

So yeah, 3 of the top 5 states (for singletracks users anyway) are on the east coast but add them all up and you barely beat California. Mountain biking is just more popular per capita in the west where land managers are more accommodating and the population is younger. So let the big mega events go to California and the west - most of us east coasters enjoy smaller, more selective <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/mountain-bike/events/events.php?eventType=all&timeframe=all&location=all">MTB events</a> anyway ;)
  1
The guys over at <a href="http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/11/05/do-you-live-on-the-east-coast/">BlueCollarMTB.com posted a complaint</a> a couple days ago about the 2008 National Mountain Bike Series calendar and the fact that only 1 out of the 6 events is on the East Coast of the US. Disappointing? A bit. Surprising? No.

In fact I'm more surprised that Idaho gets a stop on the National Mountain Bike Series. I mean, I'm sure the riding is incredible there but there just isn't a lot of nearby population to draw for the event. I'm also surprised that Colorado gets the shaft, though Park City, UT is just a 7 hour drive away from Denver ;) California gets 2 stops but they have a pretty good track record for getting folks out for big events (anyone ever hear of <a href="http://www.seaotterclassic.com/">Sea Otter</a>?).

So where are all the mountain bikers? While the east coast may have a large population, the truth is not many of us are riders out here compared to the west. For example, here is where our registered members call home:

1. California (6,157)

2. Colorado (5,296)

3. Georgia (2,788 and our home state)

4. North Carolina (2,702 and our previous home)

5. Virginia (1,890)

So yeah, 3 of the top 5 states (for singletracks users anyway) are on the east coast but add them all up and you barely beat California. Mountain biking is just more popular per capita in the west where land managers are more accommodating and the population is younger. So let the big mega events go to California and the west - most of us east coasters enjoy smaller, more selective <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/mountain-bike/events/events.php?eventType=all&timeframe=all&location=all">MTB events</a> anyway ;)
A DVD cover for the film "2 Solo," featuring a close-up of a cyclist wearing a helmet and sunglasses, along with two mountain bikers riding on a dirt path. The title "2 Solo" is prominently displayed in blue, and the cover also includes branding from sponsors like Nike and Trek, as well as a note that it is from the producers of "Off Road to Athens."
  6
A DVD case for a cycling workout titled "Cycling Pedaling Strength," featuring an image of a cyclist in action on the cover. Next to it, a black DVD disc is placed in a clear case. The disc is labeled "Singletrack MENDS."
A shiny bicycle cassette resting inside an open cardboard box, showcasing its intricate gear teeth and central sprocket. The box has a light brown color and is partially closed, with the cassette visible from above. The background is a dark surface, emphasizing the metallic shine of the cassette.
Redline D660
  3
The guys over at <a href="http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/11/05/do-you-live-on-the-east-coast/">BlueCollarMTB.com posted a complaint</a> a couple days ago about the 2008 National Mountain Bike Series calendar and the fact that only 1 out of the 6 events is on the East Coast of the US. Disappointing? A bit. Surprising? No.

In fact I'm more surprised that Idaho gets a stop on the National Mountain Bike Series. I mean, I'm sure the riding is incredible there but there just isn't a lot of nearby population to draw for the event. I'm also surprised that Colorado gets the shaft, though Park City, UT is just a 7 hour drive away from Denver ;) California gets 2 stops but they have a pretty good track record for getting folks out for big events (anyone ever hear of <a href="http://www.seaotterclassic.com/">Sea Otter</a>?).

So where are all the mountain bikers? While the east coast may have a large population, the truth is not many of us are riders out here compared to the west. For example, here is where our registered members call home:

1. California (6,157)

2. Colorado (5,296)

3. Georgia (2,788 and our home state)

4. North Carolina (2,702 and our previous home)

5. Virginia (1,890)

So yeah, 3 of the top 5 states (for singletracks users anyway) are on the east coast but add them all up and you barely beat California. Mountain biking is just more popular per capita in the west where land managers are more accommodating and the population is younger. So let the big mega events go to California and the west - most of us east coasters enjoy smaller, more selective <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/mountain-bike/events/events.php?eventType=all&timeframe=all&location=all">MTB events</a> anyway ;)
Mountain bike suspension fork displayed on a black wall. The fork features two silver aluminum stanchions with black and red branded lower legs. It includes adjustment knobs at the top and a sleek design suitable for off-road biking. A nearby sign provides additional information about the product.
A silver metal canister labeled "IMBAX" with a red "X" on top, accompanied by a circular disc with a red "X" and the word "MEET," and a circular stack of textured, replaceable inserts. The items are displayed on a white tablecloth.
  1
Interior view of a mountain bike hall of fame exhibit featuring bicycles mounted on the walls, historical photographs, and informational panels detailing inductees and the history of mountain biking.
Image of a mountain bike fork displayed against a yellow background, featuring black and red color accents. A product information card labeled "WOTAN" is attached to the fork.
A black Bell helmet displayed on a mannequin head, attached to a metal stand beside a table with promotional materials. The background is dark, and people can be seen in the distance.
  1
The guys over at <a href="http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/11/05/do-you-live-on-the-east-coast/">BlueCollarMTB.com posted a complaint</a> a couple days ago about the 2008 National Mountain Bike Series calendar and the fact that only 1 out of the 6 events is on the East Coast of the US. Disappointing? A bit. Surprising? No.

In fact I'm more surprised that Idaho gets a stop on the National Mountain Bike Series. I mean, I'm sure the riding is incredible there but there just isn't a lot of nearby population to draw for the event. I'm also surprised that Colorado gets the shaft, though Park City, UT is just a 7 hour drive away from Denver ;) California gets 2 stops but they have a pretty good track record for getting folks out for big events (anyone ever hear of <a href="http://www.seaotterclassic.com/">Sea Otter</a>?).

So where are all the mountain bikers? While the east coast may have a large population, the truth is not many of us are riders out here compared to the west. For example, here is where our registered members call home:

1. California (6,157)

2. Colorado (5,296)

3. Georgia (2,788 and our home state)

4. North Carolina (2,702 and our previous home)

5. Virginia (1,890)

So yeah, 3 of the top 5 states (for singletracks users anyway) are on the east coast but add them all up and you barely beat California. Mountain biking is just more popular per capita in the west where land managers are more accommodating and the population is younger. So let the big mega events go to California and the west - most of us east coasters enjoy smaller, more selective <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/mountain-bike/events/events.php?eventType=all&timeframe=all&location=all">MTB events</a> anyway ;)
A white mountain bike displayed at an event booth, featuring a sleek design, black tires, and a water bottle holder. The background includes promotional banners with cycling-related messages.
  2
Close-up view of a metal bike frame with visible components such as the crankset, chain, and gears. The image shows the intricate details of the mechanical parts, highlighting the craftsmanship and design of the bicycle. The background is dark, and there are tools and information displays nearby.
The guys over at <a href="http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/11/05/do-you-live-on-the-east-coast/">BlueCollarMTB.com posted a complaint</a> a couple days ago about the 2008 National Mountain Bike Series calendar and the fact that only 1 out of the 6 events is on the East Coast of the US. Disappointing? A bit. Surprising? No.

In fact I'm more surprised that Idaho gets a stop on the National Mountain Bike Series. I mean, I'm sure the riding is incredible there but there just isn't a lot of nearby population to draw for the event. I'm also surprised that Colorado gets the shaft, though Park City, UT is just a 7 hour drive away from Denver ;) California gets 2 stops but they have a pretty good track record for getting folks out for big events (anyone ever hear of <a href="http://www.seaotterclassic.com/">Sea Otter</a>?).

So where are all the mountain bikers? While the east coast may have a large population, the truth is not many of us are riders out here compared to the west. For example, here is where our registered members call home:

1. California (6,157)

2. Colorado (5,296)

3. Georgia (2,788 and our home state)

4. North Carolina (2,702 and our previous home)

5. Virginia (1,890)

So yeah, 3 of the top 5 states (for singletracks users anyway) are on the east coast but add them all up and you barely beat California. Mountain biking is just more popular per capita in the west where land managers are more accommodating and the population is younger. So let the big mega events go to California and the west - most of us east coasters enjoy smaller, more selective <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/mountain-bike/events/events.php?eventType=all&timeframe=all&location=all">MTB events</a> anyway ;)
A silver mountain bike with visible dirt on the tires is positioned next to a table covered with a fall-themed tablecloth. On the bike's frame rests an orange Halloween pumpkin helmet. In the background, another bike and a red bicycle frame can be seen.
The guys over at <a href="http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/11/05/do-you-live-on-the-east-coast/">BlueCollarMTB.com posted a complaint</a> a couple days ago about the 2008 National Mountain Bike Series calendar and the fact that only 1 out of the 6 events is on the East Coast of the US. Disappointing? A bit. Surprising? No.

In fact I'm more surprised that Idaho gets a stop on the National Mountain Bike Series. I mean, I'm sure the riding is incredible there but there just isn't a lot of nearby population to draw for the event. I'm also surprised that Colorado gets the shaft, though Park City, UT is just a 7 hour drive away from Denver ;) California gets 2 stops but they have a pretty good track record for getting folks out for big events (anyone ever hear of <a href="http://www.seaotterclassic.com/">Sea Otter</a>?).

So where are all the mountain bikers? While the east coast may have a large population, the truth is not many of us are riders out here compared to the west. For example, here is where our registered members call home:

1. California (6,157)

2. Colorado (5,296)

3. Georgia (2,788 and our home state)

4. North Carolina (2,702 and our previous home)

5. Virginia (1,890)

So yeah, 3 of the top 5 states (for singletracks users anyway) are on the east coast but add them all up and you barely beat California. Mountain biking is just more popular per capita in the west where land managers are more accommodating and the population is younger. So let the big mega events go to California and the west - most of us east coasters enjoy smaller, more selective <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/mountain-bike/events/events.php?eventType=all&timeframe=all&location=all">MTB events</a> anyway ;)
Logo of Interbike, a trade show for the bicycle industry, featuring the word "interbike" in bold, white letters on a dark textured background.
The guys over at <a href="http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/11/05/do-you-live-on-the-east-coast/">BlueCollarMTB.com posted a complaint</a> a couple days ago about the 2008 National Mountain Bike Series calendar and the fact that only 1 out of the 6 events is on the East Coast of the US. Disappointing? A bit. Surprising? No.

In fact I'm more surprised that Idaho gets a stop on the National Mountain Bike Series. I mean, I'm sure the riding is incredible there but there just isn't a lot of nearby population to draw for the event. I'm also surprised that Colorado gets the shaft, though Park City, UT is just a 7 hour drive away from Denver ;) California gets 2 stops but they have a pretty good track record for getting folks out for big events (anyone ever hear of <a href="http://www.seaotterclassic.com/">Sea Otter</a>?).

So where are all the mountain bikers? While the east coast may have a large population, the truth is not many of us are riders out here compared to the west. For example, here is where our registered members call home:

1. California (6,157)

2. Colorado (5,296)

3. Georgia (2,788 and our home state)

4. North Carolina (2,702 and our previous home)

5. Virginia (1,890)

So yeah, 3 of the top 5 states (for singletracks users anyway) are on the east coast but add them all up and you barely beat California. Mountain biking is just more popular per capita in the west where land managers are more accommodating and the population is younger. So let the big mega events go to California and the west - most of us east coasters enjoy smaller, more selective <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/mountain-bike/events/events.php?eventType=all&timeframe=all&location=all">MTB events</a> anyway ;)
The guys over at <a href="http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/11/05/do-you-live-on-the-east-coast/">BlueCollarMTB.com posted a complaint</a> a couple days ago about the 2008 National Mountain Bike Series calendar and the fact that only 1 out of the 6 events is on the East Coast of the US. Disappointing? A bit. Surprising? No.

In fact I'm more surprised that Idaho gets a stop on the National Mountain Bike Series. I mean, I'm sure the riding is incredible there but there just isn't a lot of nearby population to draw for the event. I'm also surprised that Colorado gets the shaft, though Park City, UT is just a 7 hour drive away from Denver ;) California gets 2 stops but they have a pretty good track record for getting folks out for big events (anyone ever hear of <a href="http://www.seaotterclassic.com/">Sea Otter</a>?).

So where are all the mountain bikers? While the east coast may have a large population, the truth is not many of us are riders out here compared to the west. For example, here is where our registered members call home:

1. California (6,157)

2. Colorado (5,296)

3. Georgia (2,788 and our home state)

4. North Carolina (2,702 and our previous home)

5. Virginia (1,890)

So yeah, 3 of the top 5 states (for singletracks users anyway) are on the east coast but add them all up and you barely beat California. Mountain biking is just more popular per capita in the west where land managers are more accommodating and the population is younger. So let the big mega events go to California and the west - most of us east coasters enjoy smaller, more selective <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/mountain-bike/events/events.php?eventType=all&timeframe=all&location=all">MTB events</a> anyway ;)
The guys over at <a href="http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/11/05/do-you-live-on-the-east-coast/">BlueCollarMTB.com posted a complaint</a> a couple days ago about the 2008 National Mountain Bike Series calendar and the fact that only 1 out of the 6 events is on the East Coast of the US. Disappointing? A bit. Surprising? No.

In fact I'm more surprised that Idaho gets a stop on the National Mountain Bike Series. I mean, I'm sure the riding is incredible there but there just isn't a lot of nearby population to draw for the event. I'm also surprised that Colorado gets the shaft, though Park City, UT is just a 7 hour drive away from Denver ;) California gets 2 stops but they have a pretty good track record for getting folks out for big events (anyone ever hear of <a href="http://www.seaotterclassic.com/">Sea Otter</a>?).

So where are all the mountain bikers? While the east coast may have a large population, the truth is not many of us are riders out here compared to the west. For example, here is where our registered members call home:

1. California (6,157)

2. Colorado (5,296)

3. Georgia (2,788 and our home state)

4. North Carolina (2,702 and our previous home)

5. Virginia (1,890)

So yeah, 3 of the top 5 states (for singletracks users anyway) are on the east coast but add them all up and you barely beat California. Mountain biking is just more popular per capita in the west where land managers are more accommodating and the population is younger. So let the big mega events go to California and the west - most of us east coasters enjoy smaller, more selective <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/mountain-bike/events/events.php?eventType=all&timeframe=all&location=all">MTB events</a> anyway ;)
A Garmin Edge 305 bike computer displaying metrics such as time (02:16:46), speed (38.6 km/h), total distance (64.6 km), elevation (364 m), and heart rate (139 bpm) on a dark screen with a gray casing.
  1
**Alt Text:** A chart outlining a trail difficulty rating system, including categories for trail width, tread surface, average trail grade, maximum trail grade, and natural obstacles. The system ranges from easiest (white circle) to extremely difficult (double black diamond), with specific criteria for each rating level.
The guys over at <a href="http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/11/05/do-you-live-on-the-east-coast/">BlueCollarMTB.com posted a complaint</a> a couple days ago about the 2008 National Mountain Bike Series calendar and the fact that only 1 out of the 6 events is on the East Coast of the US. Disappointing? A bit. Surprising? No.

In fact I'm more surprised that Idaho gets a stop on the National Mountain Bike Series. I mean, I'm sure the riding is incredible there but there just isn't a lot of nearby population to draw for the event. I'm also surprised that Colorado gets the shaft, though Park City, UT is just a 7 hour drive away from Denver ;) California gets 2 stops but they have a pretty good track record for getting folks out for big events (anyone ever hear of <a href="http://www.seaotterclassic.com/">Sea Otter</a>?).

So where are all the mountain bikers? While the east coast may have a large population, the truth is not many of us are riders out here compared to the west. For example, here is where our registered members call home:

1. California (6,157)

2. Colorado (5,296)

3. Georgia (2,788 and our home state)

4. North Carolina (2,702 and our previous home)

5. Virginia (1,890)

So yeah, 3 of the top 5 states (for singletracks users anyway) are on the east coast but add them all up and you barely beat California. Mountain biking is just more popular per capita in the west where land managers are more accommodating and the population is younger. So let the big mega events go to California and the west - most of us east coasters enjoy smaller, more selective <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/mountain-bike/events/events.php?eventType=all&timeframe=all&location=all">MTB events</a> anyway ;)
  1
The guys over at <a href="http://bluecollarmtb.com/2007/11/05/do-you-live-on-the-east-coast/">BlueCollarMTB.com posted a complaint</a> a couple days ago about the 2008 National Mountain Bike Series calendar and the fact that only 1 out of the 6 events is on the East Coast of the US. Disappointing? A bit. Surprising? No.

In fact I'm more surprised that Idaho gets a stop on the National Mountain Bike Series. I mean, I'm sure the riding is incredible there but there just isn't a lot of nearby population to draw for the event. I'm also surprised that Colorado gets the shaft, though Park City, UT is just a 7 hour drive away from Denver ;) California gets 2 stops but they have a pretty good track record for getting folks out for big events (anyone ever hear of <a href="http://www.seaotterclassic.com/">Sea Otter</a>?).

So where are all the mountain bikers? While the east coast may have a large population, the truth is not many of us are riders out here compared to the west. For example, here is where our registered members call home:

1. California (6,157)

2. Colorado (5,296)

3. Georgia (2,788 and our home state)

4. North Carolina (2,702 and our previous home)

5. Virginia (1,890)

So yeah, 3 of the top 5 states (for singletracks users anyway) are on the east coast but add them all up and you barely beat California. Mountain biking is just more popular per capita in the west where land managers are more accommodating and the population is younger. So let the big mega events go to California and the west - most of us east coasters enjoy smaller, more selective <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/mountain-bike/events/events.php?eventType=all&timeframe=all&location=all">MTB events</a> anyway ;)