Latest mountain bike news

The National Park Service has <a href="http://www.imba.com/news/mtb_news_wire/10_07_07_big_south_fork.html">given the thumbs</a> up after a year-long trial project allowing mountain bikes in the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area. Mountain bikes were allowed on the Grand Gap Loop Trail through a shared use plan (no bikes on weekends) and during this period there were no complaints from hikers. Based on these results the park service may potentially open more trails to shared mountain bike usage.

This is definitely great news but I'm a little skeptical about the analysis used in a projects like this. I mean, if there had been 1 complaint would they have said the project was a failure? What about if the mountain bikers complained about the hikers picking wildflowers or walking their dogs off leash? Would that get hikers banned?

Unfortunately it doesn't seem like there are good objective measures in place for assessing trail usage. Instead of weighing "complaints," perhaps land managers could look at trail impact (horses would lose here) or user group popularity (in many locations hikers would lose on this count).
Anyway, kudos to the courteous bikers of Big South Fork, perhaps we can show more land managers that we can share the trails with everyone else.
A red and silver mountain bike with wide tires, front suspension, and disc brakes, positioned on a white background.
The National Park Service has <a href="http://www.imba.com/news/mtb_news_wire/10_07_07_big_south_fork.html">given the thumbs</a> up after a year-long trial project allowing mountain bikes in the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area. Mountain bikes were allowed on the Grand Gap Loop Trail through a shared use plan (no bikes on weekends) and during this period there were no complaints from hikers. Based on these results the park service may potentially open more trails to shared mountain bike usage.

This is definitely great news but I'm a little skeptical about the analysis used in a projects like this. I mean, if there had been 1 complaint would they have said the project was a failure? What about if the mountain bikers complained about the hikers picking wildflowers or walking their dogs off leash? Would that get hikers banned?

Unfortunately it doesn't seem like there are good objective measures in place for assessing trail usage. Instead of weighing "complaints," perhaps land managers could look at trail impact (horses would lose here) or user group popularity (in many locations hikers would lose on this count).
Anyway, kudos to the courteous bikers of Big South Fork, perhaps we can show more land managers that we can share the trails with everyone else.
  1
The National Park Service has <a href="http://www.imba.com/news/mtb_news_wire/10_07_07_big_south_fork.html">given the thumbs</a> up after a year-long trial project allowing mountain bikes in the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area. Mountain bikes were allowed on the Grand Gap Loop Trail through a shared use plan (no bikes on weekends) and during this period there were no complaints from hikers. Based on these results the park service may potentially open more trails to shared mountain bike usage.

This is definitely great news but I'm a little skeptical about the analysis used in a projects like this. I mean, if there had been 1 complaint would they have said the project was a failure? What about if the mountain bikers complained about the hikers picking wildflowers or walking their dogs off leash? Would that get hikers banned?

Unfortunately it doesn't seem like there are good objective measures in place for assessing trail usage. Instead of weighing "complaints," perhaps land managers could look at trail impact (horses would lose here) or user group popularity (in many locations hikers would lose on this count).
Anyway, kudos to the courteous bikers of Big South Fork, perhaps we can show more land managers that we can share the trails with everyone else.
A DVD cover for the film "2 Solo," featuring a close-up of a cyclist wearing a helmet and sunglasses, along with two mountain bikers riding on a dirt path. The title "2 Solo" is prominently displayed in blue, and the cover also includes branding from sponsors like Nike and Trek, as well as a note that it is from the producers of "Off Road to Athens."
  6
A DVD case for a cycling workout titled "Cycling Pedaling Strength," featuring an image of a cyclist in action on the cover. Next to it, a black DVD disc is placed in a clear case. The disc is labeled "Singletrack MENDS."
A shiny bicycle cassette resting inside an open cardboard box, showcasing its intricate gear teeth and central sprocket. The box has a light brown color and is partially closed, with the cassette visible from above. The background is a dark surface, emphasizing the metallic shine of the cassette.
Redline D660
  3
The National Park Service has <a href="http://www.imba.com/news/mtb_news_wire/10_07_07_big_south_fork.html">given the thumbs</a> up after a year-long trial project allowing mountain bikes in the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area. Mountain bikes were allowed on the Grand Gap Loop Trail through a shared use plan (no bikes on weekends) and during this period there were no complaints from hikers. Based on these results the park service may potentially open more trails to shared mountain bike usage.

This is definitely great news but I'm a little skeptical about the analysis used in a projects like this. I mean, if there had been 1 complaint would they have said the project was a failure? What about if the mountain bikers complained about the hikers picking wildflowers or walking their dogs off leash? Would that get hikers banned?

Unfortunately it doesn't seem like there are good objective measures in place for assessing trail usage. Instead of weighing "complaints," perhaps land managers could look at trail impact (horses would lose here) or user group popularity (in many locations hikers would lose on this count).
Anyway, kudos to the courteous bikers of Big South Fork, perhaps we can show more land managers that we can share the trails with everyone else.
A group of people at a trade show examining a large, modern bicycle wheel displayed on a stand. The wheel features a sleek design with a carbon fiber look, and one person is interacting with it while others watch. The background includes additional cycling equipment and attendees engaged in conversation.
Mountain bike suspension fork displayed on a black wall. The fork features two silver aluminum stanchions with black and red branded lower legs. It includes adjustment knobs at the top and a sleek design suitable for off-road biking. A nearby sign provides additional information about the product.
A silver metal canister labeled "IMBAX" with a red "X" on top, accompanied by a circular disc with a red "X" and the word "MEET," and a circular stack of textured, replaceable inserts. The items are displayed on a white tablecloth.
  1
Interior view of a mountain bike hall of fame exhibit featuring bicycles mounted on the walls, historical photographs, and informational panels detailing inductees and the history of mountain biking.
Image of a mountain bike fork displayed against a yellow background, featuring black and red color accents. A product information card labeled "WOTAN" is attached to the fork.
A black Bell helmet displayed on a mannequin head, attached to a metal stand beside a table with promotional materials. The background is dark, and people can be seen in the distance.
A person holding a handheld GPS device in a display setting, with several similar devices showcased on a stand in the background. The display features a wooden backdrop and informational signs about the products.
  1
The National Park Service has <a href="http://www.imba.com/news/mtb_news_wire/10_07_07_big_south_fork.html">given the thumbs</a> up after a year-long trial project allowing mountain bikes in the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area. Mountain bikes were allowed on the Grand Gap Loop Trail through a shared use plan (no bikes on weekends) and during this period there were no complaints from hikers. Based on these results the park service may potentially open more trails to shared mountain bike usage.

This is definitely great news but I'm a little skeptical about the analysis used in a projects like this. I mean, if there had been 1 complaint would they have said the project was a failure? What about if the mountain bikers complained about the hikers picking wildflowers or walking their dogs off leash? Would that get hikers banned?

Unfortunately it doesn't seem like there are good objective measures in place for assessing trail usage. Instead of weighing "complaints," perhaps land managers could look at trail impact (horses would lose here) or user group popularity (in many locations hikers would lose on this count).
Anyway, kudos to the courteous bikers of Big South Fork, perhaps we can show more land managers that we can share the trails with everyone else.
A white mountain bike displayed at an event booth, featuring a sleek design, black tires, and a water bottle holder. The background includes promotional banners with cycling-related messages.
  2
Close-up view of a metal bike frame with visible components such as the crankset, chain, and gears. The image shows the intricate details of the mechanical parts, highlighting the craftsmanship and design of the bicycle. The background is dark, and there are tools and information displays nearby.
The National Park Service has <a href="http://www.imba.com/news/mtb_news_wire/10_07_07_big_south_fork.html">given the thumbs</a> up after a year-long trial project allowing mountain bikes in the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area. Mountain bikes were allowed on the Grand Gap Loop Trail through a shared use plan (no bikes on weekends) and during this period there were no complaints from hikers. Based on these results the park service may potentially open more trails to shared mountain bike usage.

This is definitely great news but I'm a little skeptical about the analysis used in a projects like this. I mean, if there had been 1 complaint would they have said the project was a failure? What about if the mountain bikers complained about the hikers picking wildflowers or walking their dogs off leash? Would that get hikers banned?

Unfortunately it doesn't seem like there are good objective measures in place for assessing trail usage. Instead of weighing "complaints," perhaps land managers could look at trail impact (horses would lose here) or user group popularity (in many locations hikers would lose on this count).
Anyway, kudos to the courteous bikers of Big South Fork, perhaps we can show more land managers that we can share the trails with everyone else.
A silver mountain bike with visible dirt on the tires is positioned next to a table covered with a fall-themed tablecloth. On the bike's frame rests an orange Halloween pumpkin helmet. In the background, another bike and a red bicycle frame can be seen.
The National Park Service has <a href="http://www.imba.com/news/mtb_news_wire/10_07_07_big_south_fork.html">given the thumbs</a> up after a year-long trial project allowing mountain bikes in the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area. Mountain bikes were allowed on the Grand Gap Loop Trail through a shared use plan (no bikes on weekends) and during this period there were no complaints from hikers. Based on these results the park service may potentially open more trails to shared mountain bike usage.

This is definitely great news but I'm a little skeptical about the analysis used in a projects like this. I mean, if there had been 1 complaint would they have said the project was a failure? What about if the mountain bikers complained about the hikers picking wildflowers or walking their dogs off leash? Would that get hikers banned?

Unfortunately it doesn't seem like there are good objective measures in place for assessing trail usage. Instead of weighing "complaints," perhaps land managers could look at trail impact (horses would lose here) or user group popularity (in many locations hikers would lose on this count).
Anyway, kudos to the courteous bikers of Big South Fork, perhaps we can show more land managers that we can share the trails with everyone else.
Logo of Interbike, a trade show for the bicycle industry, featuring the word "interbike" in bold, white letters on a dark textured background.
The National Park Service has <a href="http://www.imba.com/news/mtb_news_wire/10_07_07_big_south_fork.html">given the thumbs</a> up after a year-long trial project allowing mountain bikes in the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area. Mountain bikes were allowed on the Grand Gap Loop Trail through a shared use plan (no bikes on weekends) and during this period there were no complaints from hikers. Based on these results the park service may potentially open more trails to shared mountain bike usage.

This is definitely great news but I'm a little skeptical about the analysis used in a projects like this. I mean, if there had been 1 complaint would they have said the project was a failure? What about if the mountain bikers complained about the hikers picking wildflowers or walking their dogs off leash? Would that get hikers banned?

Unfortunately it doesn't seem like there are good objective measures in place for assessing trail usage. Instead of weighing "complaints," perhaps land managers could look at trail impact (horses would lose here) or user group popularity (in many locations hikers would lose on this count).
Anyway, kudos to the courteous bikers of Big South Fork, perhaps we can show more land managers that we can share the trails with everyone else.
The National Park Service has <a href="http://www.imba.com/news/mtb_news_wire/10_07_07_big_south_fork.html">given the thumbs</a> up after a year-long trial project allowing mountain bikes in the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area. Mountain bikes were allowed on the Grand Gap Loop Trail through a shared use plan (no bikes on weekends) and during this period there were no complaints from hikers. Based on these results the park service may potentially open more trails to shared mountain bike usage.

This is definitely great news but I'm a little skeptical about the analysis used in a projects like this. I mean, if there had been 1 complaint would they have said the project was a failure? What about if the mountain bikers complained about the hikers picking wildflowers or walking their dogs off leash? Would that get hikers banned?

Unfortunately it doesn't seem like there are good objective measures in place for assessing trail usage. Instead of weighing "complaints," perhaps land managers could look at trail impact (horses would lose here) or user group popularity (in many locations hikers would lose on this count).
Anyway, kudos to the courteous bikers of Big South Fork, perhaps we can show more land managers that we can share the trails with everyone else.
The National Park Service has <a href="http://www.imba.com/news/mtb_news_wire/10_07_07_big_south_fork.html">given the thumbs</a> up after a year-long trial project allowing mountain bikes in the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area. Mountain bikes were allowed on the Grand Gap Loop Trail through a shared use plan (no bikes on weekends) and during this period there were no complaints from hikers. Based on these results the park service may potentially open more trails to shared mountain bike usage.

This is definitely great news but I'm a little skeptical about the analysis used in a projects like this. I mean, if there had been 1 complaint would they have said the project was a failure? What about if the mountain bikers complained about the hikers picking wildflowers or walking their dogs off leash? Would that get hikers banned?

Unfortunately it doesn't seem like there are good objective measures in place for assessing trail usage. Instead of weighing "complaints," perhaps land managers could look at trail impact (horses would lose here) or user group popularity (in many locations hikers would lose on this count).
Anyway, kudos to the courteous bikers of Big South Fork, perhaps we can show more land managers that we can share the trails with everyone else.
A Garmin Edge 305 bike computer displaying metrics such as time (02:16:46), speed (38.6 km/h), total distance (64.6 km), elevation (364 m), and heart rate (139 bpm) on a dark screen with a gray casing.
  1
**Alt Text:** A chart outlining a trail difficulty rating system, including categories for trail width, tread surface, average trail grade, maximum trail grade, and natural obstacles. The system ranges from easiest (white circle) to extremely difficult (double black diamond), with specific criteria for each rating level.
The National Park Service has <a href="http://www.imba.com/news/mtb_news_wire/10_07_07_big_south_fork.html">given the thumbs</a> up after a year-long trial project allowing mountain bikes in the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area. Mountain bikes were allowed on the Grand Gap Loop Trail through a shared use plan (no bikes on weekends) and during this period there were no complaints from hikers. Based on these results the park service may potentially open more trails to shared mountain bike usage.

This is definitely great news but I'm a little skeptical about the analysis used in a projects like this. I mean, if there had been 1 complaint would they have said the project was a failure? What about if the mountain bikers complained about the hikers picking wildflowers or walking their dogs off leash? Would that get hikers banned?

Unfortunately it doesn't seem like there are good objective measures in place for assessing trail usage. Instead of weighing "complaints," perhaps land managers could look at trail impact (horses would lose here) or user group popularity (in many locations hikers would lose on this count).
Anyway, kudos to the courteous bikers of Big South Fork, perhaps we can show more land managers that we can share the trails with everyone else.
  1
The National Park Service has <a href="http://www.imba.com/news/mtb_news_wire/10_07_07_big_south_fork.html">given the thumbs</a> up after a year-long trial project allowing mountain bikes in the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area. Mountain bikes were allowed on the Grand Gap Loop Trail through a shared use plan (no bikes on weekends) and during this period there were no complaints from hikers. Based on these results the park service may potentially open more trails to shared mountain bike usage.

This is definitely great news but I'm a little skeptical about the analysis used in a projects like this. I mean, if there had been 1 complaint would they have said the project was a failure? What about if the mountain bikers complained about the hikers picking wildflowers or walking their dogs off leash? Would that get hikers banned?

Unfortunately it doesn't seem like there are good objective measures in place for assessing trail usage. Instead of weighing "complaints," perhaps land managers could look at trail impact (horses would lose here) or user group popularity (in many locations hikers would lose on this count).
Anyway, kudos to the courteous bikers of Big South Fork, perhaps we can show more land managers that we can share the trails with everyone else.
The National Park Service has <a href="http://www.imba.com/news/mtb_news_wire/10_07_07_big_south_fork.html">given the thumbs</a> up after a year-long trial project allowing mountain bikes in the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area. Mountain bikes were allowed on the Grand Gap Loop Trail through a shared use plan (no bikes on weekends) and during this period there were no complaints from hikers. Based on these results the park service may potentially open more trails to shared mountain bike usage.

This is definitely great news but I'm a little skeptical about the analysis used in a projects like this. I mean, if there had been 1 complaint would they have said the project was a failure? What about if the mountain bikers complained about the hikers picking wildflowers or walking their dogs off leash? Would that get hikers banned?

Unfortunately it doesn't seem like there are good objective measures in place for assessing trail usage. Instead of weighing "complaints," perhaps land managers could look at trail impact (horses would lose here) or user group popularity (in many locations hikers would lose on this count).
Anyway, kudos to the courteous bikers of Big South Fork, perhaps we can show more land managers that we can share the trails with everyone else.
  1
The National Park Service has <a href="http://www.imba.com/news/mtb_news_wire/10_07_07_big_south_fork.html">given the thumbs</a> up after a year-long trial project allowing mountain bikes in the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area. Mountain bikes were allowed on the Grand Gap Loop Trail through a shared use plan (no bikes on weekends) and during this period there were no complaints from hikers. Based on these results the park service may potentially open more trails to shared mountain bike usage.

This is definitely great news but I'm a little skeptical about the analysis used in a projects like this. I mean, if there had been 1 complaint would they have said the project was a failure? What about if the mountain bikers complained about the hikers picking wildflowers or walking their dogs off leash? Would that get hikers banned?

Unfortunately it doesn't seem like there are good objective measures in place for assessing trail usage. Instead of weighing "complaints," perhaps land managers could look at trail impact (horses would lose here) or user group popularity (in many locations hikers would lose on this count).
Anyway, kudos to the courteous bikers of Big South Fork, perhaps we can show more land managers that we can share the trails with everyone else.
The National Park Service has <a href="http://www.imba.com/news/mtb_news_wire/10_07_07_big_south_fork.html">given the thumbs</a> up after a year-long trial project allowing mountain bikes in the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area. Mountain bikes were allowed on the Grand Gap Loop Trail through a shared use plan (no bikes on weekends) and during this period there were no complaints from hikers. Based on these results the park service may potentially open more trails to shared mountain bike usage.

This is definitely great news but I'm a little skeptical about the analysis used in a projects like this. I mean, if there had been 1 complaint would they have said the project was a failure? What about if the mountain bikers complained about the hikers picking wildflowers or walking their dogs off leash? Would that get hikers banned?

Unfortunately it doesn't seem like there are good objective measures in place for assessing trail usage. Instead of weighing "complaints," perhaps land managers could look at trail impact (horses would lose here) or user group popularity (in many locations hikers would lose on this count).
Anyway, kudos to the courteous bikers of Big South Fork, perhaps we can show more land managers that we can share the trails with everyone else.
  1
The National Park Service has <a href="http://www.imba.com/news/mtb_news_wire/10_07_07_big_south_fork.html">given the thumbs</a> up after a year-long trial project allowing mountain bikes in the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area. Mountain bikes were allowed on the Grand Gap Loop Trail through a shared use plan (no bikes on weekends) and during this period there were no complaints from hikers. Based on these results the park service may potentially open more trails to shared mountain bike usage.

This is definitely great news but I'm a little skeptical about the analysis used in a projects like this. I mean, if there had been 1 complaint would they have said the project was a failure? What about if the mountain bikers complained about the hikers picking wildflowers or walking their dogs off leash? Would that get hikers banned?

Unfortunately it doesn't seem like there are good objective measures in place for assessing trail usage. Instead of weighing "complaints," perhaps land managers could look at trail impact (horses would lose here) or user group popularity (in many locations hikers would lose on this count).
Anyway, kudos to the courteous bikers of Big South Fork, perhaps we can show more land managers that we can share the trails with everyone else.
A person wearing a cycling helmet and sunglasses sits on a mountain bike on a dirt trail surrounded by lush greenery. Another mountain bike is parked nearby, and a bike saddle hangs from a tree branch in the background.
The National Park Service has <a href="http://www.imba.com/news/mtb_news_wire/10_07_07_big_south_fork.html">given the thumbs</a> up after a year-long trial project allowing mountain bikes in the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area. Mountain bikes were allowed on the Grand Gap Loop Trail through a shared use plan (no bikes on weekends) and during this period there were no complaints from hikers. Based on these results the park service may potentially open more trails to shared mountain bike usage.

This is definitely great news but I'm a little skeptical about the analysis used in a projects like this. I mean, if there had been 1 complaint would they have said the project was a failure? What about if the mountain bikers complained about the hikers picking wildflowers or walking their dogs off leash? Would that get hikers banned?

Unfortunately it doesn't seem like there are good objective measures in place for assessing trail usage. Instead of weighing "complaints," perhaps land managers could look at trail impact (horses would lose here) or user group popularity (in many locations hikers would lose on this count).
Anyway, kudos to the courteous bikers of Big South Fork, perhaps we can show more land managers that we can share the trails with everyone else.
The National Park Service has <a href="http://www.imba.com/news/mtb_news_wire/10_07_07_big_south_fork.html">given the thumbs</a> up after a year-long trial project allowing mountain bikes in the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area. Mountain bikes were allowed on the Grand Gap Loop Trail through a shared use plan (no bikes on weekends) and during this period there were no complaints from hikers. Based on these results the park service may potentially open more trails to shared mountain bike usage.

This is definitely great news but I'm a little skeptical about the analysis used in a projects like this. I mean, if there had been 1 complaint would they have said the project was a failure? What about if the mountain bikers complained about the hikers picking wildflowers or walking their dogs off leash? Would that get hikers banned?

Unfortunately it doesn't seem like there are good objective measures in place for assessing trail usage. Instead of weighing "complaints," perhaps land managers could look at trail impact (horses would lose here) or user group popularity (in many locations hikers would lose on this count).
Anyway, kudos to the courteous bikers of Big South Fork, perhaps we can show more land managers that we can share the trails with everyone else.
  1
The National Park Service has <a href="http://www.imba.com/news/mtb_news_wire/10_07_07_big_south_fork.html">given the thumbs</a> up after a year-long trial project allowing mountain bikes in the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area. Mountain bikes were allowed on the Grand Gap Loop Trail through a shared use plan (no bikes on weekends) and during this period there were no complaints from hikers. Based on these results the park service may potentially open more trails to shared mountain bike usage.

This is definitely great news but I'm a little skeptical about the analysis used in a projects like this. I mean, if there had been 1 complaint would they have said the project was a failure? What about if the mountain bikers complained about the hikers picking wildflowers or walking their dogs off leash? Would that get hikers banned?

Unfortunately it doesn't seem like there are good objective measures in place for assessing trail usage. Instead of weighing "complaints," perhaps land managers could look at trail impact (horses would lose here) or user group popularity (in many locations hikers would lose on this count).
Anyway, kudos to the courteous bikers of Big South Fork, perhaps we can show more land managers that we can share the trails with everyone else.
A rocky landscape featuring a smooth granite surface with patches of green vegetation around the edges. In the foreground, a large log is positioned on the rock, and a faint path winds across the terrain leading into the background, where lush trees are visible. Overcast skies create a soft, muted light in the scene.
  1
The National Park Service has <a href="http://www.imba.com/news/mtb_news_wire/10_07_07_big_south_fork.html">given the thumbs</a> up after a year-long trial project allowing mountain bikes in the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area. Mountain bikes were allowed on the Grand Gap Loop Trail through a shared use plan (no bikes on weekends) and during this period there were no complaints from hikers. Based on these results the park service may potentially open more trails to shared mountain bike usage.

This is definitely great news but I'm a little skeptical about the analysis used in a projects like this. I mean, if there had been 1 complaint would they have said the project was a failure? What about if the mountain bikers complained about the hikers picking wildflowers or walking their dogs off leash? Would that get hikers banned?

Unfortunately it doesn't seem like there are good objective measures in place for assessing trail usage. Instead of weighing "complaints," perhaps land managers could look at trail impact (horses would lose here) or user group popularity (in many locations hikers would lose on this count).
Anyway, kudos to the courteous bikers of Big South Fork, perhaps we can show more land managers that we can share the trails with everyone else.
The National Park Service has <a href="http://www.imba.com/news/mtb_news_wire/10_07_07_big_south_fork.html">given the thumbs</a> up after a year-long trial project allowing mountain bikes in the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area. Mountain bikes were allowed on the Grand Gap Loop Trail through a shared use plan (no bikes on weekends) and during this period there were no complaints from hikers. Based on these results the park service may potentially open more trails to shared mountain bike usage.

This is definitely great news but I'm a little skeptical about the analysis used in a projects like this. I mean, if there had been 1 complaint would they have said the project was a failure? What about if the mountain bikers complained about the hikers picking wildflowers or walking their dogs off leash? Would that get hikers banned?

Unfortunately it doesn't seem like there are good objective measures in place for assessing trail usage. Instead of weighing "complaints," perhaps land managers could look at trail impact (horses would lose here) or user group popularity (in many locations hikers would lose on this count).
Anyway, kudos to the courteous bikers of Big South Fork, perhaps we can show more land managers that we can share the trails with everyone else.
The National Park Service has <a href="http://www.imba.com/news/mtb_news_wire/10_07_07_big_south_fork.html">given the thumbs</a> up after a year-long trial project allowing mountain bikes in the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area. Mountain bikes were allowed on the Grand Gap Loop Trail through a shared use plan (no bikes on weekends) and during this period there were no complaints from hikers. Based on these results the park service may potentially open more trails to shared mountain bike usage.

This is definitely great news but I'm a little skeptical about the analysis used in a projects like this. I mean, if there had been 1 complaint would they have said the project was a failure? What about if the mountain bikers complained about the hikers picking wildflowers or walking their dogs off leash? Would that get hikers banned?

Unfortunately it doesn't seem like there are good objective measures in place for assessing trail usage. Instead of weighing "complaints," perhaps land managers could look at trail impact (horses would lose here) or user group popularity (in many locations hikers would lose on this count).
Anyway, kudos to the courteous bikers of Big South Fork, perhaps we can show more land managers that we can share the trails with everyone else.
The National Park Service has <a href="http://www.imba.com/news/mtb_news_wire/10_07_07_big_south_fork.html">given the thumbs</a> up after a year-long trial project allowing mountain bikes in the Big South Fork National River and Recreation Area. Mountain bikes were allowed on the Grand Gap Loop Trail through a shared use plan (no bikes on weekends) and during this period there were no complaints from hikers. Based on these results the park service may potentially open more trails to shared mountain bike usage.

This is definitely great news but I'm a little skeptical about the analysis used in a projects like this. I mean, if there had been 1 complaint would they have said the project was a failure? What about if the mountain bikers complained about the hikers picking wildflowers or walking their dogs off leash? Would that get hikers banned?

Unfortunately it doesn't seem like there are good objective measures in place for assessing trail usage. Instead of weighing "complaints," perhaps land managers could look at trail impact (horses would lose here) or user group popularity (in many locations hikers would lose on this count).
Anyway, kudos to the courteous bikers of Big South Fork, perhaps we can show more land managers that we can share the trails with everyone else.
  3