Latest mountain bike news

Tim Jackson had an interesting post on <a target="_blank" href="http://bicyclemarketingwatch.blogspot.com/2007/01/who-should-we-be-targeting.html">his blog</a> last week about targeting certain consumer groups to grow the sport of mountain biking. Tim identified a couple groups (those who already own inexpensive bikes and those who currently participate in other adventure sports) that might be receptive to increased marketing from the bike industry, and I think he's on the right track for the most part.

For those of you who don't know (or care), mountain biking as a sport has seen <a target="_blank" href="http://www.sgma.com/associations/5119/files/ResearchReports.cfm#participation">participation numbers</a> steadily decline since the mid-1990s, though in 2005 there was a slight uptick (probably due to higher gas prices). There are a number of explanations for why the sport is declining and I have a couple ideas of my own.

First, mountain biking is expensive (equipment, not actual participation). Tim touched on this in his post but I want to add that this seems to be a major hurdle for alot of people who are interested in mountain biking but are afraid to make the plunge. A "try before you buy" arrangement at local bike shops would allow budding mountain bikers to get hooked on the sport while at the same time teaching them about the importance of good gear (i.e. 'spensive bikes). On a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.tripleblaze.com/blog/2006/03/13/mountain-biking-in-albuquerque/">recent trip to Albuquerque</a> I found it nearly impossible to rent a mountain bike and when I did find a place that rented bikes, the only thing they had were the $150 Wal-Mart specials. Not fun.

I also think it's time to rethink just what a "cheap" mountain bike should look like. The Wal-Mart bikes I mentioned usually come with full suspension and disc brakes but end up weighing 50 pounds and generally fall apart after a couple rides. If a cycling manufacturer were to come out with an upgradeable bike, more people might be willing to give mountain biking a try. Imagine a $150 bike with a lightweight, aluminum frame, entry level components, and no front suspension. People love buying inexpensive computers for future upgrades, why not bikes? The frame is pretty much the only thing you can't upgrade on a bike so a lightweight, well-constructed frame should be the starting point for any entry level bike. Most of us who started riding in the early 1990s didn't have any kind of suspension yet we're still with the sport today - why not let people start slow like we did?

Second, mountain biking will always have a tough time growing because of the types of people who enjoy the sport. In our research at <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/">singletracks.com</a> we found that the majority of our users generally ride ALONE. Mountain biking isn't a team sport and for alot of people, it isn't even a social outlet. Like a celebate man hoping to pass on his family name, if we don't ride with others and talk up our sport, we'll be the last of a dying breed.

There are certainly dozens of reasons mountain biking isn't more popular and if we want to grow the sport it will definitely take a team effort. The cycling industry can do its part but it's up to mountain bikers to spread the buzz beyond ourselves.
Tim Jackson had an interesting post on <a target="_blank" href="http://bicyclemarketingwatch.blogspot.com/2007/01/who-should-we-be-targeting.html">his blog</a> last week about targeting certain consumer groups to grow the sport of mountain biking. Tim identified a couple groups (those who already own inexpensive bikes and those who currently participate in other adventure sports) that might be receptive to increased marketing from the bike industry, and I think he's on the right track for the most part.

For those of you who don't know (or care), mountain biking as a sport has seen <a target="_blank" href="http://www.sgma.com/associations/5119/files/ResearchReports.cfm#participation">participation numbers</a> steadily decline since the mid-1990s, though in 2005 there was a slight uptick (probably due to higher gas prices). There are a number of explanations for why the sport is declining and I have a couple ideas of my own.

First, mountain biking is expensive (equipment, not actual participation). Tim touched on this in his post but I want to add that this seems to be a major hurdle for alot of people who are interested in mountain biking but are afraid to make the plunge. A "try before you buy" arrangement at local bike shops would allow budding mountain bikers to get hooked on the sport while at the same time teaching them about the importance of good gear (i.e. 'spensive bikes). On a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.tripleblaze.com/blog/2006/03/13/mountain-biking-in-albuquerque/">recent trip to Albuquerque</a> I found it nearly impossible to rent a mountain bike and when I did find a place that rented bikes, the only thing they had were the $150 Wal-Mart specials. Not fun.

I also think it's time to rethink just what a "cheap" mountain bike should look like. The Wal-Mart bikes I mentioned usually come with full suspension and disc brakes but end up weighing 50 pounds and generally fall apart after a couple rides. If a cycling manufacturer were to come out with an upgradeable bike, more people might be willing to give mountain biking a try. Imagine a $150 bike with a lightweight, aluminum frame, entry level components, and no front suspension. People love buying inexpensive computers for future upgrades, why not bikes? The frame is pretty much the only thing you can't upgrade on a bike so a lightweight, well-constructed frame should be the starting point for any entry level bike. Most of us who started riding in the early 1990s didn't have any kind of suspension yet we're still with the sport today - why not let people start slow like we did?

Second, mountain biking will always have a tough time growing because of the types of people who enjoy the sport. In our research at <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/">singletracks.com</a> we found that the majority of our users generally ride ALONE. Mountain biking isn't a team sport and for alot of people, it isn't even a social outlet. Like a celebate man hoping to pass on his family name, if we don't ride with others and talk up our sport, we'll be the last of a dying breed.

There are certainly dozens of reasons mountain biking isn't more popular and if we want to grow the sport it will definitely take a team effort. The cycling industry can do its part but it's up to mountain bikers to spread the buzz beyond ourselves.
  2
A wooden seesaw positioned on a grassy area, surrounded by lush green foliage. The seesaw is balanced on a central pivot with one side elevated, suggesting readiness for play.
  3
A Shimano bicycle pedal featuring a silver metallic body and clip mechanism, designed for secure shoe attachment during cycling.
  1
Alt text: "Promotional poster for the film 'Klunkerz' featuring a group of people on mountain bikes. The poster includes the film's title, tagline 'They Re-Invented the Wheel,' and credits for contributions from various individuals in the mountain biking community, all set against a vintage-style background."
A close-up view of a bicycle wheel partially buried in snow, with black zip ties securing the tire to the rim. A wooden surface is visible in the background.
  3
Tim Jackson had an interesting post on <a target="_blank" href="http://bicyclemarketingwatch.blogspot.com/2007/01/who-should-we-be-targeting.html">his blog</a> last week about targeting certain consumer groups to grow the sport of mountain biking. Tim identified a couple groups (those who already own inexpensive bikes and those who currently participate in other adventure sports) that might be receptive to increased marketing from the bike industry, and I think he's on the right track for the most part.

For those of you who don't know (or care), mountain biking as a sport has seen <a target="_blank" href="http://www.sgma.com/associations/5119/files/ResearchReports.cfm#participation">participation numbers</a> steadily decline since the mid-1990s, though in 2005 there was a slight uptick (probably due to higher gas prices). There are a number of explanations for why the sport is declining and I have a couple ideas of my own.

First, mountain biking is expensive (equipment, not actual participation). Tim touched on this in his post but I want to add that this seems to be a major hurdle for alot of people who are interested in mountain biking but are afraid to make the plunge. A "try before you buy" arrangement at local bike shops would allow budding mountain bikers to get hooked on the sport while at the same time teaching them about the importance of good gear (i.e. 'spensive bikes). On a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.tripleblaze.com/blog/2006/03/13/mountain-biking-in-albuquerque/">recent trip to Albuquerque</a> I found it nearly impossible to rent a mountain bike and when I did find a place that rented bikes, the only thing they had were the $150 Wal-Mart specials. Not fun.

I also think it's time to rethink just what a "cheap" mountain bike should look like. The Wal-Mart bikes I mentioned usually come with full suspension and disc brakes but end up weighing 50 pounds and generally fall apart after a couple rides. If a cycling manufacturer were to come out with an upgradeable bike, more people might be willing to give mountain biking a try. Imagine a $150 bike with a lightweight, aluminum frame, entry level components, and no front suspension. People love buying inexpensive computers for future upgrades, why not bikes? The frame is pretty much the only thing you can't upgrade on a bike so a lightweight, well-constructed frame should be the starting point for any entry level bike. Most of us who started riding in the early 1990s didn't have any kind of suspension yet we're still with the sport today - why not let people start slow like we did?

Second, mountain biking will always have a tough time growing because of the types of people who enjoy the sport. In our research at <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/">singletracks.com</a> we found that the majority of our users generally ride ALONE. Mountain biking isn't a team sport and for alot of people, it isn't even a social outlet. Like a celebate man hoping to pass on his family name, if we don't ride with others and talk up our sport, we'll be the last of a dying breed.

There are certainly dozens of reasons mountain biking isn't more popular and if we want to grow the sport it will definitely take a team effort. The cycling industry can do its part but it's up to mountain bikers to spread the buzz beyond ourselves.
Alt text: Interior view of the Mountain Bike Hall of Fame, featuring bicycles displayed on the walls and ceiling, with informational plaques and memorabilia in the background. The words "Mountain Bike Hall of Fame" are prominently displayed.
  1
Tim Jackson had an interesting post on <a target="_blank" href="http://bicyclemarketingwatch.blogspot.com/2007/01/who-should-we-be-targeting.html">his blog</a> last week about targeting certain consumer groups to grow the sport of mountain biking. Tim identified a couple groups (those who already own inexpensive bikes and those who currently participate in other adventure sports) that might be receptive to increased marketing from the bike industry, and I think he's on the right track for the most part.

For those of you who don't know (or care), mountain biking as a sport has seen <a target="_blank" href="http://www.sgma.com/associations/5119/files/ResearchReports.cfm#participation">participation numbers</a> steadily decline since the mid-1990s, though in 2005 there was a slight uptick (probably due to higher gas prices). There are a number of explanations for why the sport is declining and I have a couple ideas of my own.

First, mountain biking is expensive (equipment, not actual participation). Tim touched on this in his post but I want to add that this seems to be a major hurdle for alot of people who are interested in mountain biking but are afraid to make the plunge. A "try before you buy" arrangement at local bike shops would allow budding mountain bikers to get hooked on the sport while at the same time teaching them about the importance of good gear (i.e. 'spensive bikes). On a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.tripleblaze.com/blog/2006/03/13/mountain-biking-in-albuquerque/">recent trip to Albuquerque</a> I found it nearly impossible to rent a mountain bike and when I did find a place that rented bikes, the only thing they had were the $150 Wal-Mart specials. Not fun.

I also think it's time to rethink just what a "cheap" mountain bike should look like. The Wal-Mart bikes I mentioned usually come with full suspension and disc brakes but end up weighing 50 pounds and generally fall apart after a couple rides. If a cycling manufacturer were to come out with an upgradeable bike, more people might be willing to give mountain biking a try. Imagine a $150 bike with a lightweight, aluminum frame, entry level components, and no front suspension. People love buying inexpensive computers for future upgrades, why not bikes? The frame is pretty much the only thing you can't upgrade on a bike so a lightweight, well-constructed frame should be the starting point for any entry level bike. Most of us who started riding in the early 1990s didn't have any kind of suspension yet we're still with the sport today - why not let people start slow like we did?

Second, mountain biking will always have a tough time growing because of the types of people who enjoy the sport. In our research at <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/">singletracks.com</a> we found that the majority of our users generally ride ALONE. Mountain biking isn't a team sport and for alot of people, it isn't even a social outlet. Like a celebate man hoping to pass on his family name, if we don't ride with others and talk up our sport, we'll be the last of a dying breed.

There are certainly dozens of reasons mountain biking isn't more popular and if we want to grow the sport it will definitely take a team effort. The cycling industry can do its part but it's up to mountain bikers to spread the buzz beyond ourselves.
A bright orange mountain bike with blue patterned rims resting against a gray concrete wall. The bike features a sleek design with a sturdy frame and front suspension, positioned on a dark asphalt surface.
A person riding a mountain bike along a dirt trail in a wooded area, surrounded by bare trees and fallen leaves. The cyclist is wearing a pink top and a helmet.
Tim Jackson had an interesting post on <a target="_blank" href="http://bicyclemarketingwatch.blogspot.com/2007/01/who-should-we-be-targeting.html">his blog</a> last week about targeting certain consumer groups to grow the sport of mountain biking. Tim identified a couple groups (those who already own inexpensive bikes and those who currently participate in other adventure sports) that might be receptive to increased marketing from the bike industry, and I think he's on the right track for the most part.

For those of you who don't know (or care), mountain biking as a sport has seen <a target="_blank" href="http://www.sgma.com/associations/5119/files/ResearchReports.cfm#participation">participation numbers</a> steadily decline since the mid-1990s, though in 2005 there was a slight uptick (probably due to higher gas prices). There are a number of explanations for why the sport is declining and I have a couple ideas of my own.

First, mountain biking is expensive (equipment, not actual participation). Tim touched on this in his post but I want to add that this seems to be a major hurdle for alot of people who are interested in mountain biking but are afraid to make the plunge. A "try before you buy" arrangement at local bike shops would allow budding mountain bikers to get hooked on the sport while at the same time teaching them about the importance of good gear (i.e. 'spensive bikes). On a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.tripleblaze.com/blog/2006/03/13/mountain-biking-in-albuquerque/">recent trip to Albuquerque</a> I found it nearly impossible to rent a mountain bike and when I did find a place that rented bikes, the only thing they had were the $150 Wal-Mart specials. Not fun.

I also think it's time to rethink just what a "cheap" mountain bike should look like. The Wal-Mart bikes I mentioned usually come with full suspension and disc brakes but end up weighing 50 pounds and generally fall apart after a couple rides. If a cycling manufacturer were to come out with an upgradeable bike, more people might be willing to give mountain biking a try. Imagine a $150 bike with a lightweight, aluminum frame, entry level components, and no front suspension. People love buying inexpensive computers for future upgrades, why not bikes? The frame is pretty much the only thing you can't upgrade on a bike so a lightweight, well-constructed frame should be the starting point for any entry level bike. Most of us who started riding in the early 1990s didn't have any kind of suspension yet we're still with the sport today - why not let people start slow like we did?

Second, mountain biking will always have a tough time growing because of the types of people who enjoy the sport. In our research at <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/">singletracks.com</a> we found that the majority of our users generally ride ALONE. Mountain biking isn't a team sport and for alot of people, it isn't even a social outlet. Like a celebate man hoping to pass on his family name, if we don't ride with others and talk up our sport, we'll be the last of a dying breed.

There are certainly dozens of reasons mountain biking isn't more popular and if we want to grow the sport it will definitely take a team effort. The cycling industry can do its part but it's up to mountain bikers to spread the buzz beyond ourselves.
Tim Jackson had an interesting post on <a target="_blank" href="http://bicyclemarketingwatch.blogspot.com/2007/01/who-should-we-be-targeting.html">his blog</a> last week about targeting certain consumer groups to grow the sport of mountain biking. Tim identified a couple groups (those who already own inexpensive bikes and those who currently participate in other adventure sports) that might be receptive to increased marketing from the bike industry, and I think he's on the right track for the most part.

For those of you who don't know (or care), mountain biking as a sport has seen <a target="_blank" href="http://www.sgma.com/associations/5119/files/ResearchReports.cfm#participation">participation numbers</a> steadily decline since the mid-1990s, though in 2005 there was a slight uptick (probably due to higher gas prices). There are a number of explanations for why the sport is declining and I have a couple ideas of my own.

First, mountain biking is expensive (equipment, not actual participation). Tim touched on this in his post but I want to add that this seems to be a major hurdle for alot of people who are interested in mountain biking but are afraid to make the plunge. A "try before you buy" arrangement at local bike shops would allow budding mountain bikers to get hooked on the sport while at the same time teaching them about the importance of good gear (i.e. 'spensive bikes). On a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.tripleblaze.com/blog/2006/03/13/mountain-biking-in-albuquerque/">recent trip to Albuquerque</a> I found it nearly impossible to rent a mountain bike and when I did find a place that rented bikes, the only thing they had were the $150 Wal-Mart specials. Not fun.

I also think it's time to rethink just what a "cheap" mountain bike should look like. The Wal-Mart bikes I mentioned usually come with full suspension and disc brakes but end up weighing 50 pounds and generally fall apart after a couple rides. If a cycling manufacturer were to come out with an upgradeable bike, more people might be willing to give mountain biking a try. Imagine a $150 bike with a lightweight, aluminum frame, entry level components, and no front suspension. People love buying inexpensive computers for future upgrades, why not bikes? The frame is pretty much the only thing you can't upgrade on a bike so a lightweight, well-constructed frame should be the starting point for any entry level bike. Most of us who started riding in the early 1990s didn't have any kind of suspension yet we're still with the sport today - why not let people start slow like we did?

Second, mountain biking will always have a tough time growing because of the types of people who enjoy the sport. In our research at <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/">singletracks.com</a> we found that the majority of our users generally ride ALONE. Mountain biking isn't a team sport and for alot of people, it isn't even a social outlet. Like a celebate man hoping to pass on his family name, if we don't ride with others and talk up our sport, we'll be the last of a dying breed.

There are certainly dozens of reasons mountain biking isn't more popular and if we want to grow the sport it will definitely take a team effort. The cycling industry can do its part but it's up to mountain bikers to spread the buzz beyond ourselves.
  1
A group of cyclists races along a rural road while spectators watch and take photos from the roadside. The cyclists are wearing blue and white jerseys, and one is leading the pack. In the background, there are two vehicles parked on the shoulder and rocky terrain alongside the road.
Sock with a cartoon chicken design, featuring a red and white color scheme and the text "Ya Clucken" printed on the side, displayed on a wooden surface.
A smiling man swimming underwater, giving a thumbs-up gesture while wearing a waterproof device on his arm. The background features a clear blue ocean with coral visible below. The text "music.gives.Joy" is overlaid on the image.
Tim Jackson had an interesting post on <a target="_blank" href="http://bicyclemarketingwatch.blogspot.com/2007/01/who-should-we-be-targeting.html">his blog</a> last week about targeting certain consumer groups to grow the sport of mountain biking. Tim identified a couple groups (those who already own inexpensive bikes and those who currently participate in other adventure sports) that might be receptive to increased marketing from the bike industry, and I think he's on the right track for the most part.

For those of you who don't know (or care), mountain biking as a sport has seen <a target="_blank" href="http://www.sgma.com/associations/5119/files/ResearchReports.cfm#participation">participation numbers</a> steadily decline since the mid-1990s, though in 2005 there was a slight uptick (probably due to higher gas prices). There are a number of explanations for why the sport is declining and I have a couple ideas of my own.

First, mountain biking is expensive (equipment, not actual participation). Tim touched on this in his post but I want to add that this seems to be a major hurdle for alot of people who are interested in mountain biking but are afraid to make the plunge. A "try before you buy" arrangement at local bike shops would allow budding mountain bikers to get hooked on the sport while at the same time teaching them about the importance of good gear (i.e. 'spensive bikes). On a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.tripleblaze.com/blog/2006/03/13/mountain-biking-in-albuquerque/">recent trip to Albuquerque</a> I found it nearly impossible to rent a mountain bike and when I did find a place that rented bikes, the only thing they had were the $150 Wal-Mart specials. Not fun.

I also think it's time to rethink just what a "cheap" mountain bike should look like. The Wal-Mart bikes I mentioned usually come with full suspension and disc brakes but end up weighing 50 pounds and generally fall apart after a couple rides. If a cycling manufacturer were to come out with an upgradeable bike, more people might be willing to give mountain biking a try. Imagine a $150 bike with a lightweight, aluminum frame, entry level components, and no front suspension. People love buying inexpensive computers for future upgrades, why not bikes? The frame is pretty much the only thing you can't upgrade on a bike so a lightweight, well-constructed frame should be the starting point for any entry level bike. Most of us who started riding in the early 1990s didn't have any kind of suspension yet we're still with the sport today - why not let people start slow like we did?

Second, mountain biking will always have a tough time growing because of the types of people who enjoy the sport. In our research at <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/">singletracks.com</a> we found that the majority of our users generally ride ALONE. Mountain biking isn't a team sport and for alot of people, it isn't even a social outlet. Like a celebate man hoping to pass on his family name, if we don't ride with others and talk up our sport, we'll be the last of a dying breed.

There are certainly dozens of reasons mountain biking isn't more popular and if we want to grow the sport it will definitely take a team effort. The cycling industry can do its part but it's up to mountain bikers to spread the buzz beyond ourselves.
Tim Jackson had an interesting post on <a target="_blank" href="http://bicyclemarketingwatch.blogspot.com/2007/01/who-should-we-be-targeting.html">his blog</a> last week about targeting certain consumer groups to grow the sport of mountain biking. Tim identified a couple groups (those who already own inexpensive bikes and those who currently participate in other adventure sports) that might be receptive to increased marketing from the bike industry, and I think he's on the right track for the most part.

For those of you who don't know (or care), mountain biking as a sport has seen <a target="_blank" href="http://www.sgma.com/associations/5119/files/ResearchReports.cfm#participation">participation numbers</a> steadily decline since the mid-1990s, though in 2005 there was a slight uptick (probably due to higher gas prices). There are a number of explanations for why the sport is declining and I have a couple ideas of my own.

First, mountain biking is expensive (equipment, not actual participation). Tim touched on this in his post but I want to add that this seems to be a major hurdle for alot of people who are interested in mountain biking but are afraid to make the plunge. A "try before you buy" arrangement at local bike shops would allow budding mountain bikers to get hooked on the sport while at the same time teaching them about the importance of good gear (i.e. 'spensive bikes). On a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.tripleblaze.com/blog/2006/03/13/mountain-biking-in-albuquerque/">recent trip to Albuquerque</a> I found it nearly impossible to rent a mountain bike and when I did find a place that rented bikes, the only thing they had were the $150 Wal-Mart specials. Not fun.

I also think it's time to rethink just what a "cheap" mountain bike should look like. The Wal-Mart bikes I mentioned usually come with full suspension and disc brakes but end up weighing 50 pounds and generally fall apart after a couple rides. If a cycling manufacturer were to come out with an upgradeable bike, more people might be willing to give mountain biking a try. Imagine a $150 bike with a lightweight, aluminum frame, entry level components, and no front suspension. People love buying inexpensive computers for future upgrades, why not bikes? The frame is pretty much the only thing you can't upgrade on a bike so a lightweight, well-constructed frame should be the starting point for any entry level bike. Most of us who started riding in the early 1990s didn't have any kind of suspension yet we're still with the sport today - why not let people start slow like we did?

Second, mountain biking will always have a tough time growing because of the types of people who enjoy the sport. In our research at <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/">singletracks.com</a> we found that the majority of our users generally ride ALONE. Mountain biking isn't a team sport and for alot of people, it isn't even a social outlet. Like a celebate man hoping to pass on his family name, if we don't ride with others and talk up our sport, we'll be the last of a dying breed.

There are certainly dozens of reasons mountain biking isn't more popular and if we want to grow the sport it will definitely take a team effort. The cycling industry can do its part but it's up to mountain bikers to spread the buzz beyond ourselves.
  2
Alt text: A Suunto watch with a digital display, accompanied by a heart rate monitor strap and a sensor. The watch features a round face and a black rubber band, while the sensor and strap are in black with the Suunto logo.
Tim Jackson had an interesting post on <a target="_blank" href="http://bicyclemarketingwatch.blogspot.com/2007/01/who-should-we-be-targeting.html">his blog</a> last week about targeting certain consumer groups to grow the sport of mountain biking. Tim identified a couple groups (those who already own inexpensive bikes and those who currently participate in other adventure sports) that might be receptive to increased marketing from the bike industry, and I think he's on the right track for the most part.

For those of you who don't know (or care), mountain biking as a sport has seen <a target="_blank" href="http://www.sgma.com/associations/5119/files/ResearchReports.cfm#participation">participation numbers</a> steadily decline since the mid-1990s, though in 2005 there was a slight uptick (probably due to higher gas prices). There are a number of explanations for why the sport is declining and I have a couple ideas of my own.

First, mountain biking is expensive (equipment, not actual participation). Tim touched on this in his post but I want to add that this seems to be a major hurdle for alot of people who are interested in mountain biking but are afraid to make the plunge. A "try before you buy" arrangement at local bike shops would allow budding mountain bikers to get hooked on the sport while at the same time teaching them about the importance of good gear (i.e. 'spensive bikes). On a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.tripleblaze.com/blog/2006/03/13/mountain-biking-in-albuquerque/">recent trip to Albuquerque</a> I found it nearly impossible to rent a mountain bike and when I did find a place that rented bikes, the only thing they had were the $150 Wal-Mart specials. Not fun.

I also think it's time to rethink just what a "cheap" mountain bike should look like. The Wal-Mart bikes I mentioned usually come with full suspension and disc brakes but end up weighing 50 pounds and generally fall apart after a couple rides. If a cycling manufacturer were to come out with an upgradeable bike, more people might be willing to give mountain biking a try. Imagine a $150 bike with a lightweight, aluminum frame, entry level components, and no front suspension. People love buying inexpensive computers for future upgrades, why not bikes? The frame is pretty much the only thing you can't upgrade on a bike so a lightweight, well-constructed frame should be the starting point for any entry level bike. Most of us who started riding in the early 1990s didn't have any kind of suspension yet we're still with the sport today - why not let people start slow like we did?

Second, mountain biking will always have a tough time growing because of the types of people who enjoy the sport. In our research at <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/">singletracks.com</a> we found that the majority of our users generally ride ALONE. Mountain biking isn't a team sport and for alot of people, it isn't even a social outlet. Like a celebate man hoping to pass on his family name, if we don't ride with others and talk up our sport, we'll be the last of a dying breed.

There are certainly dozens of reasons mountain biking isn't more popular and if we want to grow the sport it will definitely take a team effort. The cycling industry can do its part but it's up to mountain bikers to spread the buzz beyond ourselves.
Image of a t-shirt featuring a graphic design related to downhill mountain biking. The shirt is olive green with an orange and gray color scheme. The main elements include the letters "DH" and "MTB," along with the text "DOWNHILL MOUNTAIN BIKETEAM." An illustration of a cyclist riding downhill is prominently displayed, accompanied by directional arrows and warning symbols. The design suggests a focus on mountain biking and adventure sports.
  2
Tim Jackson had an interesting post on <a target="_blank" href="http://bicyclemarketingwatch.blogspot.com/2007/01/who-should-we-be-targeting.html">his blog</a> last week about targeting certain consumer groups to grow the sport of mountain biking. Tim identified a couple groups (those who already own inexpensive bikes and those who currently participate in other adventure sports) that might be receptive to increased marketing from the bike industry, and I think he's on the right track for the most part.

For those of you who don't know (or care), mountain biking as a sport has seen <a target="_blank" href="http://www.sgma.com/associations/5119/files/ResearchReports.cfm#participation">participation numbers</a> steadily decline since the mid-1990s, though in 2005 there was a slight uptick (probably due to higher gas prices). There are a number of explanations for why the sport is declining and I have a couple ideas of my own.

First, mountain biking is expensive (equipment, not actual participation). Tim touched on this in his post but I want to add that this seems to be a major hurdle for alot of people who are interested in mountain biking but are afraid to make the plunge. A "try before you buy" arrangement at local bike shops would allow budding mountain bikers to get hooked on the sport while at the same time teaching them about the importance of good gear (i.e. 'spensive bikes). On a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.tripleblaze.com/blog/2006/03/13/mountain-biking-in-albuquerque/">recent trip to Albuquerque</a> I found it nearly impossible to rent a mountain bike and when I did find a place that rented bikes, the only thing they had were the $150 Wal-Mart specials. Not fun.

I also think it's time to rethink just what a "cheap" mountain bike should look like. The Wal-Mart bikes I mentioned usually come with full suspension and disc brakes but end up weighing 50 pounds and generally fall apart after a couple rides. If a cycling manufacturer were to come out with an upgradeable bike, more people might be willing to give mountain biking a try. Imagine a $150 bike with a lightweight, aluminum frame, entry level components, and no front suspension. People love buying inexpensive computers for future upgrades, why not bikes? The frame is pretty much the only thing you can't upgrade on a bike so a lightweight, well-constructed frame should be the starting point for any entry level bike. Most of us who started riding in the early 1990s didn't have any kind of suspension yet we're still with the sport today - why not let people start slow like we did?

Second, mountain biking will always have a tough time growing because of the types of people who enjoy the sport. In our research at <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/">singletracks.com</a> we found that the majority of our users generally ride ALONE. Mountain biking isn't a team sport and for alot of people, it isn't even a social outlet. Like a celebate man hoping to pass on his family name, if we don't ride with others and talk up our sport, we'll be the last of a dying breed.

There are certainly dozens of reasons mountain biking isn't more popular and if we want to grow the sport it will definitely take a team effort. The cycling industry can do its part but it's up to mountain bikers to spread the buzz beyond ourselves.
  4
An orange GPS device, the Earthmate PN-40, resting on a bed of brown dried leaves, displaying a mapping interface with coordinates and distance information.
Tim Jackson had an interesting post on <a target="_blank" href="http://bicyclemarketingwatch.blogspot.com/2007/01/who-should-we-be-targeting.html">his blog</a> last week about targeting certain consumer groups to grow the sport of mountain biking. Tim identified a couple groups (those who already own inexpensive bikes and those who currently participate in other adventure sports) that might be receptive to increased marketing from the bike industry, and I think he's on the right track for the most part.

For those of you who don't know (or care), mountain biking as a sport has seen <a target="_blank" href="http://www.sgma.com/associations/5119/files/ResearchReports.cfm#participation">participation numbers</a> steadily decline since the mid-1990s, though in 2005 there was a slight uptick (probably due to higher gas prices). There are a number of explanations for why the sport is declining and I have a couple ideas of my own.

First, mountain biking is expensive (equipment, not actual participation). Tim touched on this in his post but I want to add that this seems to be a major hurdle for alot of people who are interested in mountain biking but are afraid to make the plunge. A "try before you buy" arrangement at local bike shops would allow budding mountain bikers to get hooked on the sport while at the same time teaching them about the importance of good gear (i.e. 'spensive bikes). On a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.tripleblaze.com/blog/2006/03/13/mountain-biking-in-albuquerque/">recent trip to Albuquerque</a> I found it nearly impossible to rent a mountain bike and when I did find a place that rented bikes, the only thing they had were the $150 Wal-Mart specials. Not fun.

I also think it's time to rethink just what a "cheap" mountain bike should look like. The Wal-Mart bikes I mentioned usually come with full suspension and disc brakes but end up weighing 50 pounds and generally fall apart after a couple rides. If a cycling manufacturer were to come out with an upgradeable bike, more people might be willing to give mountain biking a try. Imagine a $150 bike with a lightweight, aluminum frame, entry level components, and no front suspension. People love buying inexpensive computers for future upgrades, why not bikes? The frame is pretty much the only thing you can't upgrade on a bike so a lightweight, well-constructed frame should be the starting point for any entry level bike. Most of us who started riding in the early 1990s didn't have any kind of suspension yet we're still with the sport today - why not let people start slow like we did?

Second, mountain biking will always have a tough time growing because of the types of people who enjoy the sport. In our research at <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/">singletracks.com</a> we found that the majority of our users generally ride ALONE. Mountain biking isn't a team sport and for alot of people, it isn't even a social outlet. Like a celebate man hoping to pass on his family name, if we don't ride with others and talk up our sport, we'll be the last of a dying breed.

There are certainly dozens of reasons mountain biking isn't more popular and if we want to grow the sport it will definitely take a team effort. The cycling industry can do its part but it's up to mountain bikers to spread the buzz beyond ourselves.
Tim Jackson had an interesting post on <a target="_blank" href="http://bicyclemarketingwatch.blogspot.com/2007/01/who-should-we-be-targeting.html">his blog</a> last week about targeting certain consumer groups to grow the sport of mountain biking. Tim identified a couple groups (those who already own inexpensive bikes and those who currently participate in other adventure sports) that might be receptive to increased marketing from the bike industry, and I think he's on the right track for the most part.

For those of you who don't know (or care), mountain biking as a sport has seen <a target="_blank" href="http://www.sgma.com/associations/5119/files/ResearchReports.cfm#participation">participation numbers</a> steadily decline since the mid-1990s, though in 2005 there was a slight uptick (probably due to higher gas prices). There are a number of explanations for why the sport is declining and I have a couple ideas of my own.

First, mountain biking is expensive (equipment, not actual participation). Tim touched on this in his post but I want to add that this seems to be a major hurdle for alot of people who are interested in mountain biking but are afraid to make the plunge. A "try before you buy" arrangement at local bike shops would allow budding mountain bikers to get hooked on the sport while at the same time teaching them about the importance of good gear (i.e. 'spensive bikes). On a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.tripleblaze.com/blog/2006/03/13/mountain-biking-in-albuquerque/">recent trip to Albuquerque</a> I found it nearly impossible to rent a mountain bike and when I did find a place that rented bikes, the only thing they had were the $150 Wal-Mart specials. Not fun.

I also think it's time to rethink just what a "cheap" mountain bike should look like. The Wal-Mart bikes I mentioned usually come with full suspension and disc brakes but end up weighing 50 pounds and generally fall apart after a couple rides. If a cycling manufacturer were to come out with an upgradeable bike, more people might be willing to give mountain biking a try. Imagine a $150 bike with a lightweight, aluminum frame, entry level components, and no front suspension. People love buying inexpensive computers for future upgrades, why not bikes? The frame is pretty much the only thing you can't upgrade on a bike so a lightweight, well-constructed frame should be the starting point for any entry level bike. Most of us who started riding in the early 1990s didn't have any kind of suspension yet we're still with the sport today - why not let people start slow like we did?

Second, mountain biking will always have a tough time growing because of the types of people who enjoy the sport. In our research at <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/">singletracks.com</a> we found that the majority of our users generally ride ALONE. Mountain biking isn't a team sport and for alot of people, it isn't even a social outlet. Like a celebate man hoping to pass on his family name, if we don't ride with others and talk up our sport, we'll be the last of a dying breed.

There are certainly dozens of reasons mountain biking isn't more popular and if we want to grow the sport it will definitely take a team effort. The cycling industry can do its part but it's up to mountain bikers to spread the buzz beyond ourselves.
Tim Jackson had an interesting post on <a target="_blank" href="http://bicyclemarketingwatch.blogspot.com/2007/01/who-should-we-be-targeting.html">his blog</a> last week about targeting certain consumer groups to grow the sport of mountain biking. Tim identified a couple groups (those who already own inexpensive bikes and those who currently participate in other adventure sports) that might be receptive to increased marketing from the bike industry, and I think he's on the right track for the most part.

For those of you who don't know (or care), mountain biking as a sport has seen <a target="_blank" href="http://www.sgma.com/associations/5119/files/ResearchReports.cfm#participation">participation numbers</a> steadily decline since the mid-1990s, though in 2005 there was a slight uptick (probably due to higher gas prices). There are a number of explanations for why the sport is declining and I have a couple ideas of my own.

First, mountain biking is expensive (equipment, not actual participation). Tim touched on this in his post but I want to add that this seems to be a major hurdle for alot of people who are interested in mountain biking but are afraid to make the plunge. A "try before you buy" arrangement at local bike shops would allow budding mountain bikers to get hooked on the sport while at the same time teaching them about the importance of good gear (i.e. 'spensive bikes). On a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.tripleblaze.com/blog/2006/03/13/mountain-biking-in-albuquerque/">recent trip to Albuquerque</a> I found it nearly impossible to rent a mountain bike and when I did find a place that rented bikes, the only thing they had were the $150 Wal-Mart specials. Not fun.

I also think it's time to rethink just what a "cheap" mountain bike should look like. The Wal-Mart bikes I mentioned usually come with full suspension and disc brakes but end up weighing 50 pounds and generally fall apart after a couple rides. If a cycling manufacturer were to come out with an upgradeable bike, more people might be willing to give mountain biking a try. Imagine a $150 bike with a lightweight, aluminum frame, entry level components, and no front suspension. People love buying inexpensive computers for future upgrades, why not bikes? The frame is pretty much the only thing you can't upgrade on a bike so a lightweight, well-constructed frame should be the starting point for any entry level bike. Most of us who started riding in the early 1990s didn't have any kind of suspension yet we're still with the sport today - why not let people start slow like we did?

Second, mountain biking will always have a tough time growing because of the types of people who enjoy the sport. In our research at <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/">singletracks.com</a> we found that the majority of our users generally ride ALONE. Mountain biking isn't a team sport and for alot of people, it isn't even a social outlet. Like a celebate man hoping to pass on his family name, if we don't ride with others and talk up our sport, we'll be the last of a dying breed.

There are certainly dozens of reasons mountain biking isn't more popular and if we want to grow the sport it will definitely take a team effort. The cycling industry can do its part but it's up to mountain bikers to spread the buzz beyond ourselves.
Tim Jackson had an interesting post on <a target="_blank" href="http://bicyclemarketingwatch.blogspot.com/2007/01/who-should-we-be-targeting.html">his blog</a> last week about targeting certain consumer groups to grow the sport of mountain biking. Tim identified a couple groups (those who already own inexpensive bikes and those who currently participate in other adventure sports) that might be receptive to increased marketing from the bike industry, and I think he's on the right track for the most part.

For those of you who don't know (or care), mountain biking as a sport has seen <a target="_blank" href="http://www.sgma.com/associations/5119/files/ResearchReports.cfm#participation">participation numbers</a> steadily decline since the mid-1990s, though in 2005 there was a slight uptick (probably due to higher gas prices). There are a number of explanations for why the sport is declining and I have a couple ideas of my own.

First, mountain biking is expensive (equipment, not actual participation). Tim touched on this in his post but I want to add that this seems to be a major hurdle for alot of people who are interested in mountain biking but are afraid to make the plunge. A "try before you buy" arrangement at local bike shops would allow budding mountain bikers to get hooked on the sport while at the same time teaching them about the importance of good gear (i.e. 'spensive bikes). On a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.tripleblaze.com/blog/2006/03/13/mountain-biking-in-albuquerque/">recent trip to Albuquerque</a> I found it nearly impossible to rent a mountain bike and when I did find a place that rented bikes, the only thing they had were the $150 Wal-Mart specials. Not fun.

I also think it's time to rethink just what a "cheap" mountain bike should look like. The Wal-Mart bikes I mentioned usually come with full suspension and disc brakes but end up weighing 50 pounds and generally fall apart after a couple rides. If a cycling manufacturer were to come out with an upgradeable bike, more people might be willing to give mountain biking a try. Imagine a $150 bike with a lightweight, aluminum frame, entry level components, and no front suspension. People love buying inexpensive computers for future upgrades, why not bikes? The frame is pretty much the only thing you can't upgrade on a bike so a lightweight, well-constructed frame should be the starting point for any entry level bike. Most of us who started riding in the early 1990s didn't have any kind of suspension yet we're still with the sport today - why not let people start slow like we did?

Second, mountain biking will always have a tough time growing because of the types of people who enjoy the sport. In our research at <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/">singletracks.com</a> we found that the majority of our users generally ride ALONE. Mountain biking isn't a team sport and for alot of people, it isn't even a social outlet. Like a celebate man hoping to pass on his family name, if we don't ride with others and talk up our sport, we'll be the last of a dying breed.

There are certainly dozens of reasons mountain biking isn't more popular and if we want to grow the sport it will definitely take a team effort. The cycling industry can do its part but it's up to mountain bikers to spread the buzz beyond ourselves.
Tim Jackson had an interesting post on <a target="_blank" href="http://bicyclemarketingwatch.blogspot.com/2007/01/who-should-we-be-targeting.html">his blog</a> last week about targeting certain consumer groups to grow the sport of mountain biking. Tim identified a couple groups (those who already own inexpensive bikes and those who currently participate in other adventure sports) that might be receptive to increased marketing from the bike industry, and I think he's on the right track for the most part.

For those of you who don't know (or care), mountain biking as a sport has seen <a target="_blank" href="http://www.sgma.com/associations/5119/files/ResearchReports.cfm#participation">participation numbers</a> steadily decline since the mid-1990s, though in 2005 there was a slight uptick (probably due to higher gas prices). There are a number of explanations for why the sport is declining and I have a couple ideas of my own.

First, mountain biking is expensive (equipment, not actual participation). Tim touched on this in his post but I want to add that this seems to be a major hurdle for alot of people who are interested in mountain biking but are afraid to make the plunge. A "try before you buy" arrangement at local bike shops would allow budding mountain bikers to get hooked on the sport while at the same time teaching them about the importance of good gear (i.e. 'spensive bikes). On a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.tripleblaze.com/blog/2006/03/13/mountain-biking-in-albuquerque/">recent trip to Albuquerque</a> I found it nearly impossible to rent a mountain bike and when I did find a place that rented bikes, the only thing they had were the $150 Wal-Mart specials. Not fun.

I also think it's time to rethink just what a "cheap" mountain bike should look like. The Wal-Mart bikes I mentioned usually come with full suspension and disc brakes but end up weighing 50 pounds and generally fall apart after a couple rides. If a cycling manufacturer were to come out with an upgradeable bike, more people might be willing to give mountain biking a try. Imagine a $150 bike with a lightweight, aluminum frame, entry level components, and no front suspension. People love buying inexpensive computers for future upgrades, why not bikes? The frame is pretty much the only thing you can't upgrade on a bike so a lightweight, well-constructed frame should be the starting point for any entry level bike. Most of us who started riding in the early 1990s didn't have any kind of suspension yet we're still with the sport today - why not let people start slow like we did?

Second, mountain biking will always have a tough time growing because of the types of people who enjoy the sport. In our research at <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/">singletracks.com</a> we found that the majority of our users generally ride ALONE. Mountain biking isn't a team sport and for alot of people, it isn't even a social outlet. Like a celebate man hoping to pass on his family name, if we don't ride with others and talk up our sport, we'll be the last of a dying breed.

There are certainly dozens of reasons mountain biking isn't more popular and if we want to grow the sport it will definitely take a team effort. The cycling industry can do its part but it's up to mountain bikers to spread the buzz beyond ourselves.
Close-up of a DeLorme Earthmate PN-40 GPS device mounted on a bike handlebar, displaying a detailed map with a speed reading of 0.2 mph. The device features an orange casing with various buttons for navigation.
Tim Jackson had an interesting post on <a target="_blank" href="http://bicyclemarketingwatch.blogspot.com/2007/01/who-should-we-be-targeting.html">his blog</a> last week about targeting certain consumer groups to grow the sport of mountain biking. Tim identified a couple groups (those who already own inexpensive bikes and those who currently participate in other adventure sports) that might be receptive to increased marketing from the bike industry, and I think he's on the right track for the most part.

For those of you who don't know (or care), mountain biking as a sport has seen <a target="_blank" href="http://www.sgma.com/associations/5119/files/ResearchReports.cfm#participation">participation numbers</a> steadily decline since the mid-1990s, though in 2005 there was a slight uptick (probably due to higher gas prices). There are a number of explanations for why the sport is declining and I have a couple ideas of my own.

First, mountain biking is expensive (equipment, not actual participation). Tim touched on this in his post but I want to add that this seems to be a major hurdle for alot of people who are interested in mountain biking but are afraid to make the plunge. A "try before you buy" arrangement at local bike shops would allow budding mountain bikers to get hooked on the sport while at the same time teaching them about the importance of good gear (i.e. 'spensive bikes). On a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.tripleblaze.com/blog/2006/03/13/mountain-biking-in-albuquerque/">recent trip to Albuquerque</a> I found it nearly impossible to rent a mountain bike and when I did find a place that rented bikes, the only thing they had were the $150 Wal-Mart specials. Not fun.

I also think it's time to rethink just what a "cheap" mountain bike should look like. The Wal-Mart bikes I mentioned usually come with full suspension and disc brakes but end up weighing 50 pounds and generally fall apart after a couple rides. If a cycling manufacturer were to come out with an upgradeable bike, more people might be willing to give mountain biking a try. Imagine a $150 bike with a lightweight, aluminum frame, entry level components, and no front suspension. People love buying inexpensive computers for future upgrades, why not bikes? The frame is pretty much the only thing you can't upgrade on a bike so a lightweight, well-constructed frame should be the starting point for any entry level bike. Most of us who started riding in the early 1990s didn't have any kind of suspension yet we're still with the sport today - why not let people start slow like we did?

Second, mountain biking will always have a tough time growing because of the types of people who enjoy the sport. In our research at <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/">singletracks.com</a> we found that the majority of our users generally ride ALONE. Mountain biking isn't a team sport and for alot of people, it isn't even a social outlet. Like a celebate man hoping to pass on his family name, if we don't ride with others and talk up our sport, we'll be the last of a dying breed.

There are certainly dozens of reasons mountain biking isn't more popular and if we want to grow the sport it will definitely take a team effort. The cycling industry can do its part but it's up to mountain bikers to spread the buzz beyond ourselves.
Tim Jackson had an interesting post on <a target="_blank" href="http://bicyclemarketingwatch.blogspot.com/2007/01/who-should-we-be-targeting.html">his blog</a> last week about targeting certain consumer groups to grow the sport of mountain biking. Tim identified a couple groups (those who already own inexpensive bikes and those who currently participate in other adventure sports) that might be receptive to increased marketing from the bike industry, and I think he's on the right track for the most part.

For those of you who don't know (or care), mountain biking as a sport has seen <a target="_blank" href="http://www.sgma.com/associations/5119/files/ResearchReports.cfm#participation">participation numbers</a> steadily decline since the mid-1990s, though in 2005 there was a slight uptick (probably due to higher gas prices). There are a number of explanations for why the sport is declining and I have a couple ideas of my own.

First, mountain biking is expensive (equipment, not actual participation). Tim touched on this in his post but I want to add that this seems to be a major hurdle for alot of people who are interested in mountain biking but are afraid to make the plunge. A "try before you buy" arrangement at local bike shops would allow budding mountain bikers to get hooked on the sport while at the same time teaching them about the importance of good gear (i.e. 'spensive bikes). On a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.tripleblaze.com/blog/2006/03/13/mountain-biking-in-albuquerque/">recent trip to Albuquerque</a> I found it nearly impossible to rent a mountain bike and when I did find a place that rented bikes, the only thing they had were the $150 Wal-Mart specials. Not fun.

I also think it's time to rethink just what a "cheap" mountain bike should look like. The Wal-Mart bikes I mentioned usually come with full suspension and disc brakes but end up weighing 50 pounds and generally fall apart after a couple rides. If a cycling manufacturer were to come out with an upgradeable bike, more people might be willing to give mountain biking a try. Imagine a $150 bike with a lightweight, aluminum frame, entry level components, and no front suspension. People love buying inexpensive computers for future upgrades, why not bikes? The frame is pretty much the only thing you can't upgrade on a bike so a lightweight, well-constructed frame should be the starting point for any entry level bike. Most of us who started riding in the early 1990s didn't have any kind of suspension yet we're still with the sport today - why not let people start slow like we did?

Second, mountain biking will always have a tough time growing because of the types of people who enjoy the sport. In our research at <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/">singletracks.com</a> we found that the majority of our users generally ride ALONE. Mountain biking isn't a team sport and for alot of people, it isn't even a social outlet. Like a celebate man hoping to pass on his family name, if we don't ride with others and talk up our sport, we'll be the last of a dying breed.

There are certainly dozens of reasons mountain biking isn't more popular and if we want to grow the sport it will definitely take a team effort. The cycling industry can do its part but it's up to mountain bikers to spread the buzz beyond ourselves.
Tim Jackson had an interesting post on <a target="_blank" href="http://bicyclemarketingwatch.blogspot.com/2007/01/who-should-we-be-targeting.html">his blog</a> last week about targeting certain consumer groups to grow the sport of mountain biking. Tim identified a couple groups (those who already own inexpensive bikes and those who currently participate in other adventure sports) that might be receptive to increased marketing from the bike industry, and I think he's on the right track for the most part.

For those of you who don't know (or care), mountain biking as a sport has seen <a target="_blank" href="http://www.sgma.com/associations/5119/files/ResearchReports.cfm#participation">participation numbers</a> steadily decline since the mid-1990s, though in 2005 there was a slight uptick (probably due to higher gas prices). There are a number of explanations for why the sport is declining and I have a couple ideas of my own.

First, mountain biking is expensive (equipment, not actual participation). Tim touched on this in his post but I want to add that this seems to be a major hurdle for alot of people who are interested in mountain biking but are afraid to make the plunge. A "try before you buy" arrangement at local bike shops would allow budding mountain bikers to get hooked on the sport while at the same time teaching them about the importance of good gear (i.e. 'spensive bikes). On a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.tripleblaze.com/blog/2006/03/13/mountain-biking-in-albuquerque/">recent trip to Albuquerque</a> I found it nearly impossible to rent a mountain bike and when I did find a place that rented bikes, the only thing they had were the $150 Wal-Mart specials. Not fun.

I also think it's time to rethink just what a "cheap" mountain bike should look like. The Wal-Mart bikes I mentioned usually come with full suspension and disc brakes but end up weighing 50 pounds and generally fall apart after a couple rides. If a cycling manufacturer were to come out with an upgradeable bike, more people might be willing to give mountain biking a try. Imagine a $150 bike with a lightweight, aluminum frame, entry level components, and no front suspension. People love buying inexpensive computers for future upgrades, why not bikes? The frame is pretty much the only thing you can't upgrade on a bike so a lightweight, well-constructed frame should be the starting point for any entry level bike. Most of us who started riding in the early 1990s didn't have any kind of suspension yet we're still with the sport today - why not let people start slow like we did?

Second, mountain biking will always have a tough time growing because of the types of people who enjoy the sport. In our research at <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/">singletracks.com</a> we found that the majority of our users generally ride ALONE. Mountain biking isn't a team sport and for alot of people, it isn't even a social outlet. Like a celebate man hoping to pass on his family name, if we don't ride with others and talk up our sport, we'll be the last of a dying breed.

There are certainly dozens of reasons mountain biking isn't more popular and if we want to grow the sport it will definitely take a team effort. The cycling industry can do its part but it's up to mountain bikers to spread the buzz beyond ourselves.
  2
Tim Jackson had an interesting post on <a target="_blank" href="http://bicyclemarketingwatch.blogspot.com/2007/01/who-should-we-be-targeting.html">his blog</a> last week about targeting certain consumer groups to grow the sport of mountain biking. Tim identified a couple groups (those who already own inexpensive bikes and those who currently participate in other adventure sports) that might be receptive to increased marketing from the bike industry, and I think he's on the right track for the most part.

For those of you who don't know (or care), mountain biking as a sport has seen <a target="_blank" href="http://www.sgma.com/associations/5119/files/ResearchReports.cfm#participation">participation numbers</a> steadily decline since the mid-1990s, though in 2005 there was a slight uptick (probably due to higher gas prices). There are a number of explanations for why the sport is declining and I have a couple ideas of my own.

First, mountain biking is expensive (equipment, not actual participation). Tim touched on this in his post but I want to add that this seems to be a major hurdle for alot of people who are interested in mountain biking but are afraid to make the plunge. A "try before you buy" arrangement at local bike shops would allow budding mountain bikers to get hooked on the sport while at the same time teaching them about the importance of good gear (i.e. 'spensive bikes). On a <a target="_blank" href="http://www.tripleblaze.com/blog/2006/03/13/mountain-biking-in-albuquerque/">recent trip to Albuquerque</a> I found it nearly impossible to rent a mountain bike and when I did find a place that rented bikes, the only thing they had were the $150 Wal-Mart specials. Not fun.

I also think it's time to rethink just what a "cheap" mountain bike should look like. The Wal-Mart bikes I mentioned usually come with full suspension and disc brakes but end up weighing 50 pounds and generally fall apart after a couple rides. If a cycling manufacturer were to come out with an upgradeable bike, more people might be willing to give mountain biking a try. Imagine a $150 bike with a lightweight, aluminum frame, entry level components, and no front suspension. People love buying inexpensive computers for future upgrades, why not bikes? The frame is pretty much the only thing you can't upgrade on a bike so a lightweight, well-constructed frame should be the starting point for any entry level bike. Most of us who started riding in the early 1990s didn't have any kind of suspension yet we're still with the sport today - why not let people start slow like we did?

Second, mountain biking will always have a tough time growing because of the types of people who enjoy the sport. In our research at <a href="http://www.singletracks.com/">singletracks.com</a> we found that the majority of our users generally ride ALONE. Mountain biking isn't a team sport and for alot of people, it isn't even a social outlet. Like a celebate man hoping to pass on his family name, if we don't ride with others and talk up our sport, we'll be the last of a dying breed.

There are certainly dozens of reasons mountain biking isn't more popular and if we want to grow the sport it will definitely take a team effort. The cycling industry can do its part but it's up to mountain bikers to spread the buzz beyond ourselves.
  1
A cyclist riding a mountain bike along a dirt trail in a wooded area during late autumn, surrounded by bare trees and fallen leaves. The cyclist is wearing a red helmet and a pink shirt, actively navigating the path.
  1