Latest mountain bike news

<a href="http://www.allenracks.com/">Allen Sports</a> announced a new GPS-cellphone navigation system at Interbike this week that's a bit perplexing. I mean, the premise is that The Navigator lets you use your cell phone to navigate while on the bike and eliminates the need for a separate GPS device. But hold on - you gotta bring along the Allen Sports GPS pod that transmits position data to your cellphone via bluetooth. Now you have two devices AND you're using your tiny cell phone screen to look at the map. Huh? How did that eliminate anything except functionality?

As if that isn't enough, if you happen to ride outside cell phone range (like say, in the mountains) you're out of luck - no maps, no coverage. Ouch. And at $349 retail it costs more than the top of the line (for the moment) Garmin Edge - and the Allen Sport can't even track heart rate or cadence!

Trimble has a similar system and I've always wondered why you'd go to such lengths to use a cell phone for something it's not designed to do. The iPod is great at playing music, the Razr is a good cell phone, and the Edge is a capable GPS for biking. Why mess with that?

My advice is that Allen stick to what it knows - building bike racks. Leave the tech to the geeks.
A group of people at a trade show examining a large, modern bicycle wheel displayed on a stand. The wheel features a sleek design with a carbon fiber look, and one person is interacting with it while others watch. The background includes additional cycling equipment and attendees engaged in conversation.
Mountain bike suspension fork displayed on a black wall. The fork features two silver aluminum stanchions with black and red branded lower legs. It includes adjustment knobs at the top and a sleek design suitable for off-road biking. A nearby sign provides additional information about the product.
A silver metal canister labeled "IMBAX" with a red "X" on top, accompanied by a circular disc with a red "X" and the word "MEET," and a circular stack of textured, replaceable inserts. The items are displayed on a white tablecloth.
  1
Interior view of a mountain bike hall of fame exhibit featuring bicycles mounted on the walls, historical photographs, and informational panels detailing inductees and the history of mountain biking.
Image of a mountain bike fork displayed against a yellow background, featuring black and red color accents. A product information card labeled "WOTAN" is attached to the fork.
A black Bell helmet displayed on a mannequin head, attached to a metal stand beside a table with promotional materials. The background is dark, and people can be seen in the distance.
A person holding a handheld GPS device in a display setting, with several similar devices showcased on a stand in the background. The display features a wooden backdrop and informational signs about the products.
  1
<a href="http://www.allenracks.com/">Allen Sports</a> announced a new GPS-cellphone navigation system at Interbike this week that's a bit perplexing. I mean, the premise is that The Navigator lets you use your cell phone to navigate while on the bike and eliminates the need for a separate GPS device. But hold on - you gotta bring along the Allen Sports GPS pod that transmits position data to your cellphone via bluetooth. Now you have two devices AND you're using your tiny cell phone screen to look at the map. Huh? How did that eliminate anything except functionality?

As if that isn't enough, if you happen to ride outside cell phone range (like say, in the mountains) you're out of luck - no maps, no coverage. Ouch. And at $349 retail it costs more than the top of the line (for the moment) Garmin Edge - and the Allen Sport can't even track heart rate or cadence!

Trimble has a similar system and I've always wondered why you'd go to such lengths to use a cell phone for something it's not designed to do. The iPod is great at playing music, the Razr is a good cell phone, and the Edge is a capable GPS for biking. Why mess with that?

My advice is that Allen stick to what it knows - building bike racks. Leave the tech to the geeks.
A white mountain bike displayed at an event booth, featuring a sleek design, black tires, and a water bottle holder. The background includes promotional banners with cycling-related messages.
  2
Close-up view of a metal bike frame with visible components such as the crankset, chain, and gears. The image shows the intricate details of the mechanical parts, highlighting the craftsmanship and design of the bicycle. The background is dark, and there are tools and information displays nearby.
<a href="http://www.allenracks.com/">Allen Sports</a> announced a new GPS-cellphone navigation system at Interbike this week that's a bit perplexing. I mean, the premise is that The Navigator lets you use your cell phone to navigate while on the bike and eliminates the need for a separate GPS device. But hold on - you gotta bring along the Allen Sports GPS pod that transmits position data to your cellphone via bluetooth. Now you have two devices AND you're using your tiny cell phone screen to look at the map. Huh? How did that eliminate anything except functionality?

As if that isn't enough, if you happen to ride outside cell phone range (like say, in the mountains) you're out of luck - no maps, no coverage. Ouch. And at $349 retail it costs more than the top of the line (for the moment) Garmin Edge - and the Allen Sport can't even track heart rate or cadence!

Trimble has a similar system and I've always wondered why you'd go to such lengths to use a cell phone for something it's not designed to do. The iPod is great at playing music, the Razr is a good cell phone, and the Edge is a capable GPS for biking. Why mess with that?

My advice is that Allen stick to what it knows - building bike racks. Leave the tech to the geeks.
A silver mountain bike with visible dirt on the tires is positioned next to a table covered with a fall-themed tablecloth. On the bike's frame rests an orange Halloween pumpkin helmet. In the background, another bike and a red bicycle frame can be seen.
<a href="http://www.allenracks.com/">Allen Sports</a> announced a new GPS-cellphone navigation system at Interbike this week that's a bit perplexing. I mean, the premise is that The Navigator lets you use your cell phone to navigate while on the bike and eliminates the need for a separate GPS device. But hold on - you gotta bring along the Allen Sports GPS pod that transmits position data to your cellphone via bluetooth. Now you have two devices AND you're using your tiny cell phone screen to look at the map. Huh? How did that eliminate anything except functionality?

As if that isn't enough, if you happen to ride outside cell phone range (like say, in the mountains) you're out of luck - no maps, no coverage. Ouch. And at $349 retail it costs more than the top of the line (for the moment) Garmin Edge - and the Allen Sport can't even track heart rate or cadence!

Trimble has a similar system and I've always wondered why you'd go to such lengths to use a cell phone for something it's not designed to do. The iPod is great at playing music, the Razr is a good cell phone, and the Edge is a capable GPS for biking. Why mess with that?

My advice is that Allen stick to what it knows - building bike racks. Leave the tech to the geeks.
Logo of Interbike, a trade show for the bicycle industry, featuring the word "interbike" in bold, white letters on a dark textured background.
<a href="http://www.allenracks.com/">Allen Sports</a> announced a new GPS-cellphone navigation system at Interbike this week that's a bit perplexing. I mean, the premise is that The Navigator lets you use your cell phone to navigate while on the bike and eliminates the need for a separate GPS device. But hold on - you gotta bring along the Allen Sports GPS pod that transmits position data to your cellphone via bluetooth. Now you have two devices AND you're using your tiny cell phone screen to look at the map. Huh? How did that eliminate anything except functionality?

As if that isn't enough, if you happen to ride outside cell phone range (like say, in the mountains) you're out of luck - no maps, no coverage. Ouch. And at $349 retail it costs more than the top of the line (for the moment) Garmin Edge - and the Allen Sport can't even track heart rate or cadence!

Trimble has a similar system and I've always wondered why you'd go to such lengths to use a cell phone for something it's not designed to do. The iPod is great at playing music, the Razr is a good cell phone, and the Edge is a capable GPS for biking. Why mess with that?

My advice is that Allen stick to what it knows - building bike racks. Leave the tech to the geeks.
<a href="http://www.allenracks.com/">Allen Sports</a> announced a new GPS-cellphone navigation system at Interbike this week that's a bit perplexing. I mean, the premise is that The Navigator lets you use your cell phone to navigate while on the bike and eliminates the need for a separate GPS device. But hold on - you gotta bring along the Allen Sports GPS pod that transmits position data to your cellphone via bluetooth. Now you have two devices AND you're using your tiny cell phone screen to look at the map. Huh? How did that eliminate anything except functionality?

As if that isn't enough, if you happen to ride outside cell phone range (like say, in the mountains) you're out of luck - no maps, no coverage. Ouch. And at $349 retail it costs more than the top of the line (for the moment) Garmin Edge - and the Allen Sport can't even track heart rate or cadence!

Trimble has a similar system and I've always wondered why you'd go to such lengths to use a cell phone for something it's not designed to do. The iPod is great at playing music, the Razr is a good cell phone, and the Edge is a capable GPS for biking. Why mess with that?

My advice is that Allen stick to what it knows - building bike racks. Leave the tech to the geeks.
<a href="http://www.allenracks.com/">Allen Sports</a> announced a new GPS-cellphone navigation system at Interbike this week that's a bit perplexing. I mean, the premise is that The Navigator lets you use your cell phone to navigate while on the bike and eliminates the need for a separate GPS device. But hold on - you gotta bring along the Allen Sports GPS pod that transmits position data to your cellphone via bluetooth. Now you have two devices AND you're using your tiny cell phone screen to look at the map. Huh? How did that eliminate anything except functionality?

As if that isn't enough, if you happen to ride outside cell phone range (like say, in the mountains) you're out of luck - no maps, no coverage. Ouch. And at $349 retail it costs more than the top of the line (for the moment) Garmin Edge - and the Allen Sport can't even track heart rate or cadence!

Trimble has a similar system and I've always wondered why you'd go to such lengths to use a cell phone for something it's not designed to do. The iPod is great at playing music, the Razr is a good cell phone, and the Edge is a capable GPS for biking. Why mess with that?

My advice is that Allen stick to what it knows - building bike racks. Leave the tech to the geeks.
A Garmin Edge 305 bike computer displaying metrics such as time (02:16:46), speed (38.6 km/h), total distance (64.6 km), elevation (364 m), and heart rate (139 bpm) on a dark screen with a gray casing.
  1
**Alt Text:** A chart outlining a trail difficulty rating system, including categories for trail width, tread surface, average trail grade, maximum trail grade, and natural obstacles. The system ranges from easiest (white circle) to extremely difficult (double black diamond), with specific criteria for each rating level.
<a href="http://www.allenracks.com/">Allen Sports</a> announced a new GPS-cellphone navigation system at Interbike this week that's a bit perplexing. I mean, the premise is that The Navigator lets you use your cell phone to navigate while on the bike and eliminates the need for a separate GPS device. But hold on - you gotta bring along the Allen Sports GPS pod that transmits position data to your cellphone via bluetooth. Now you have two devices AND you're using your tiny cell phone screen to look at the map. Huh? How did that eliminate anything except functionality?

As if that isn't enough, if you happen to ride outside cell phone range (like say, in the mountains) you're out of luck - no maps, no coverage. Ouch. And at $349 retail it costs more than the top of the line (for the moment) Garmin Edge - and the Allen Sport can't even track heart rate or cadence!

Trimble has a similar system and I've always wondered why you'd go to such lengths to use a cell phone for something it's not designed to do. The iPod is great at playing music, the Razr is a good cell phone, and the Edge is a capable GPS for biking. Why mess with that?

My advice is that Allen stick to what it knows - building bike racks. Leave the tech to the geeks.
  1
<a href="http://www.allenracks.com/">Allen Sports</a> announced a new GPS-cellphone navigation system at Interbike this week that's a bit perplexing. I mean, the premise is that The Navigator lets you use your cell phone to navigate while on the bike and eliminates the need for a separate GPS device. But hold on - you gotta bring along the Allen Sports GPS pod that transmits position data to your cellphone via bluetooth. Now you have two devices AND you're using your tiny cell phone screen to look at the map. Huh? How did that eliminate anything except functionality?

As if that isn't enough, if you happen to ride outside cell phone range (like say, in the mountains) you're out of luck - no maps, no coverage. Ouch. And at $349 retail it costs more than the top of the line (for the moment) Garmin Edge - and the Allen Sport can't even track heart rate or cadence!

Trimble has a similar system and I've always wondered why you'd go to such lengths to use a cell phone for something it's not designed to do. The iPod is great at playing music, the Razr is a good cell phone, and the Edge is a capable GPS for biking. Why mess with that?

My advice is that Allen stick to what it knows - building bike racks. Leave the tech to the geeks.
<a href="http://www.allenracks.com/">Allen Sports</a> announced a new GPS-cellphone navigation system at Interbike this week that's a bit perplexing. I mean, the premise is that The Navigator lets you use your cell phone to navigate while on the bike and eliminates the need for a separate GPS device. But hold on - you gotta bring along the Allen Sports GPS pod that transmits position data to your cellphone via bluetooth. Now you have two devices AND you're using your tiny cell phone screen to look at the map. Huh? How did that eliminate anything except functionality?

As if that isn't enough, if you happen to ride outside cell phone range (like say, in the mountains) you're out of luck - no maps, no coverage. Ouch. And at $349 retail it costs more than the top of the line (for the moment) Garmin Edge - and the Allen Sport can't even track heart rate or cadence!

Trimble has a similar system and I've always wondered why you'd go to such lengths to use a cell phone for something it's not designed to do. The iPod is great at playing music, the Razr is a good cell phone, and the Edge is a capable GPS for biking. Why mess with that?

My advice is that Allen stick to what it knows - building bike racks. Leave the tech to the geeks.
  1
<a href="http://www.allenracks.com/">Allen Sports</a> announced a new GPS-cellphone navigation system at Interbike this week that's a bit perplexing. I mean, the premise is that The Navigator lets you use your cell phone to navigate while on the bike and eliminates the need for a separate GPS device. But hold on - you gotta bring along the Allen Sports GPS pod that transmits position data to your cellphone via bluetooth. Now you have two devices AND you're using your tiny cell phone screen to look at the map. Huh? How did that eliminate anything except functionality?

As if that isn't enough, if you happen to ride outside cell phone range (like say, in the mountains) you're out of luck - no maps, no coverage. Ouch. And at $349 retail it costs more than the top of the line (for the moment) Garmin Edge - and the Allen Sport can't even track heart rate or cadence!

Trimble has a similar system and I've always wondered why you'd go to such lengths to use a cell phone for something it's not designed to do. The iPod is great at playing music, the Razr is a good cell phone, and the Edge is a capable GPS for biking. Why mess with that?

My advice is that Allen stick to what it knows - building bike racks. Leave the tech to the geeks.
<a href="http://www.allenracks.com/">Allen Sports</a> announced a new GPS-cellphone navigation system at Interbike this week that's a bit perplexing. I mean, the premise is that The Navigator lets you use your cell phone to navigate while on the bike and eliminates the need for a separate GPS device. But hold on - you gotta bring along the Allen Sports GPS pod that transmits position data to your cellphone via bluetooth. Now you have two devices AND you're using your tiny cell phone screen to look at the map. Huh? How did that eliminate anything except functionality?

As if that isn't enough, if you happen to ride outside cell phone range (like say, in the mountains) you're out of luck - no maps, no coverage. Ouch. And at $349 retail it costs more than the top of the line (for the moment) Garmin Edge - and the Allen Sport can't even track heart rate or cadence!

Trimble has a similar system and I've always wondered why you'd go to such lengths to use a cell phone for something it's not designed to do. The iPod is great at playing music, the Razr is a good cell phone, and the Edge is a capable GPS for biking. Why mess with that?

My advice is that Allen stick to what it knows - building bike racks. Leave the tech to the geeks.
  1
<a href="http://www.allenracks.com/">Allen Sports</a> announced a new GPS-cellphone navigation system at Interbike this week that's a bit perplexing. I mean, the premise is that The Navigator lets you use your cell phone to navigate while on the bike and eliminates the need for a separate GPS device. But hold on - you gotta bring along the Allen Sports GPS pod that transmits position data to your cellphone via bluetooth. Now you have two devices AND you're using your tiny cell phone screen to look at the map. Huh? How did that eliminate anything except functionality?

As if that isn't enough, if you happen to ride outside cell phone range (like say, in the mountains) you're out of luck - no maps, no coverage. Ouch. And at $349 retail it costs more than the top of the line (for the moment) Garmin Edge - and the Allen Sport can't even track heart rate or cadence!

Trimble has a similar system and I've always wondered why you'd go to such lengths to use a cell phone for something it's not designed to do. The iPod is great at playing music, the Razr is a good cell phone, and the Edge is a capable GPS for biking. Why mess with that?

My advice is that Allen stick to what it knows - building bike racks. Leave the tech to the geeks.
A person wearing a cycling helmet and sunglasses sits on a mountain bike on a dirt trail surrounded by lush greenery. Another mountain bike is parked nearby, and a bike saddle hangs from a tree branch in the background.
<a href="http://www.allenracks.com/">Allen Sports</a> announced a new GPS-cellphone navigation system at Interbike this week that's a bit perplexing. I mean, the premise is that The Navigator lets you use your cell phone to navigate while on the bike and eliminates the need for a separate GPS device. But hold on - you gotta bring along the Allen Sports GPS pod that transmits position data to your cellphone via bluetooth. Now you have two devices AND you're using your tiny cell phone screen to look at the map. Huh? How did that eliminate anything except functionality?

As if that isn't enough, if you happen to ride outside cell phone range (like say, in the mountains) you're out of luck - no maps, no coverage. Ouch. And at $349 retail it costs more than the top of the line (for the moment) Garmin Edge - and the Allen Sport can't even track heart rate or cadence!

Trimble has a similar system and I've always wondered why you'd go to such lengths to use a cell phone for something it's not designed to do. The iPod is great at playing music, the Razr is a good cell phone, and the Edge is a capable GPS for biking. Why mess with that?

My advice is that Allen stick to what it knows - building bike racks. Leave the tech to the geeks.
<a href="http://www.allenracks.com/">Allen Sports</a> announced a new GPS-cellphone navigation system at Interbike this week that's a bit perplexing. I mean, the premise is that The Navigator lets you use your cell phone to navigate while on the bike and eliminates the need for a separate GPS device. But hold on - you gotta bring along the Allen Sports GPS pod that transmits position data to your cellphone via bluetooth. Now you have two devices AND you're using your tiny cell phone screen to look at the map. Huh? How did that eliminate anything except functionality?

As if that isn't enough, if you happen to ride outside cell phone range (like say, in the mountains) you're out of luck - no maps, no coverage. Ouch. And at $349 retail it costs more than the top of the line (for the moment) Garmin Edge - and the Allen Sport can't even track heart rate or cadence!

Trimble has a similar system and I've always wondered why you'd go to such lengths to use a cell phone for something it's not designed to do. The iPod is great at playing music, the Razr is a good cell phone, and the Edge is a capable GPS for biking. Why mess with that?

My advice is that Allen stick to what it knows - building bike racks. Leave the tech to the geeks.
  1
<a href="http://www.allenracks.com/">Allen Sports</a> announced a new GPS-cellphone navigation system at Interbike this week that's a bit perplexing. I mean, the premise is that The Navigator lets you use your cell phone to navigate while on the bike and eliminates the need for a separate GPS device. But hold on - you gotta bring along the Allen Sports GPS pod that transmits position data to your cellphone via bluetooth. Now you have two devices AND you're using your tiny cell phone screen to look at the map. Huh? How did that eliminate anything except functionality?

As if that isn't enough, if you happen to ride outside cell phone range (like say, in the mountains) you're out of luck - no maps, no coverage. Ouch. And at $349 retail it costs more than the top of the line (for the moment) Garmin Edge - and the Allen Sport can't even track heart rate or cadence!

Trimble has a similar system and I've always wondered why you'd go to such lengths to use a cell phone for something it's not designed to do. The iPod is great at playing music, the Razr is a good cell phone, and the Edge is a capable GPS for biking. Why mess with that?

My advice is that Allen stick to what it knows - building bike racks. Leave the tech to the geeks.
A rocky landscape featuring a smooth granite surface with patches of green vegetation around the edges. In the foreground, a large log is positioned on the rock, and a faint path winds across the terrain leading into the background, where lush trees are visible. Overcast skies create a soft, muted light in the scene.
  1
<a href="http://www.allenracks.com/">Allen Sports</a> announced a new GPS-cellphone navigation system at Interbike this week that's a bit perplexing. I mean, the premise is that The Navigator lets you use your cell phone to navigate while on the bike and eliminates the need for a separate GPS device. But hold on - you gotta bring along the Allen Sports GPS pod that transmits position data to your cellphone via bluetooth. Now you have two devices AND you're using your tiny cell phone screen to look at the map. Huh? How did that eliminate anything except functionality?

As if that isn't enough, if you happen to ride outside cell phone range (like say, in the mountains) you're out of luck - no maps, no coverage. Ouch. And at $349 retail it costs more than the top of the line (for the moment) Garmin Edge - and the Allen Sport can't even track heart rate or cadence!

Trimble has a similar system and I've always wondered why you'd go to such lengths to use a cell phone for something it's not designed to do. The iPod is great at playing music, the Razr is a good cell phone, and the Edge is a capable GPS for biking. Why mess with that?

My advice is that Allen stick to what it knows - building bike racks. Leave the tech to the geeks.
<a href="http://www.allenracks.com/">Allen Sports</a> announced a new GPS-cellphone navigation system at Interbike this week that's a bit perplexing. I mean, the premise is that The Navigator lets you use your cell phone to navigate while on the bike and eliminates the need for a separate GPS device. But hold on - you gotta bring along the Allen Sports GPS pod that transmits position data to your cellphone via bluetooth. Now you have two devices AND you're using your tiny cell phone screen to look at the map. Huh? How did that eliminate anything except functionality?

As if that isn't enough, if you happen to ride outside cell phone range (like say, in the mountains) you're out of luck - no maps, no coverage. Ouch. And at $349 retail it costs more than the top of the line (for the moment) Garmin Edge - and the Allen Sport can't even track heart rate or cadence!

Trimble has a similar system and I've always wondered why you'd go to such lengths to use a cell phone for something it's not designed to do. The iPod is great at playing music, the Razr is a good cell phone, and the Edge is a capable GPS for biking. Why mess with that?

My advice is that Allen stick to what it knows - building bike racks. Leave the tech to the geeks.
<a href="http://www.allenracks.com/">Allen Sports</a> announced a new GPS-cellphone navigation system at Interbike this week that's a bit perplexing. I mean, the premise is that The Navigator lets you use your cell phone to navigate while on the bike and eliminates the need for a separate GPS device. But hold on - you gotta bring along the Allen Sports GPS pod that transmits position data to your cellphone via bluetooth. Now you have two devices AND you're using your tiny cell phone screen to look at the map. Huh? How did that eliminate anything except functionality?

As if that isn't enough, if you happen to ride outside cell phone range (like say, in the mountains) you're out of luck - no maps, no coverage. Ouch. And at $349 retail it costs more than the top of the line (for the moment) Garmin Edge - and the Allen Sport can't even track heart rate or cadence!

Trimble has a similar system and I've always wondered why you'd go to such lengths to use a cell phone for something it's not designed to do. The iPod is great at playing music, the Razr is a good cell phone, and the Edge is a capable GPS for biking. Why mess with that?

My advice is that Allen stick to what it knows - building bike racks. Leave the tech to the geeks.
<a href="http://www.allenracks.com/">Allen Sports</a> announced a new GPS-cellphone navigation system at Interbike this week that's a bit perplexing. I mean, the premise is that The Navigator lets you use your cell phone to navigate while on the bike and eliminates the need for a separate GPS device. But hold on - you gotta bring along the Allen Sports GPS pod that transmits position data to your cellphone via bluetooth. Now you have two devices AND you're using your tiny cell phone screen to look at the map. Huh? How did that eliminate anything except functionality?

As if that isn't enough, if you happen to ride outside cell phone range (like say, in the mountains) you're out of luck - no maps, no coverage. Ouch. And at $349 retail it costs more than the top of the line (for the moment) Garmin Edge - and the Allen Sport can't even track heart rate or cadence!

Trimble has a similar system and I've always wondered why you'd go to such lengths to use a cell phone for something it's not designed to do. The iPod is great at playing music, the Razr is a good cell phone, and the Edge is a capable GPS for biking. Why mess with that?

My advice is that Allen stick to what it knows - building bike racks. Leave the tech to the geeks.
  3
<a href="http://www.allenracks.com/">Allen Sports</a> announced a new GPS-cellphone navigation system at Interbike this week that's a bit perplexing. I mean, the premise is that The Navigator lets you use your cell phone to navigate while on the bike and eliminates the need for a separate GPS device. But hold on - you gotta bring along the Allen Sports GPS pod that transmits position data to your cellphone via bluetooth. Now you have two devices AND you're using your tiny cell phone screen to look at the map. Huh? How did that eliminate anything except functionality?

As if that isn't enough, if you happen to ride outside cell phone range (like say, in the mountains) you're out of luck - no maps, no coverage. Ouch. And at $349 retail it costs more than the top of the line (for the moment) Garmin Edge - and the Allen Sport can't even track heart rate or cadence!

Trimble has a similar system and I've always wondered why you'd go to such lengths to use a cell phone for something it's not designed to do. The iPod is great at playing music, the Razr is a good cell phone, and the Edge is a capable GPS for biking. Why mess with that?

My advice is that Allen stick to what it knows - building bike racks. Leave the tech to the geeks.
  1
<a href="http://www.allenracks.com/">Allen Sports</a> announced a new GPS-cellphone navigation system at Interbike this week that's a bit perplexing. I mean, the premise is that The Navigator lets you use your cell phone to navigate while on the bike and eliminates the need for a separate GPS device. But hold on - you gotta bring along the Allen Sports GPS pod that transmits position data to your cellphone via bluetooth. Now you have two devices AND you're using your tiny cell phone screen to look at the map. Huh? How did that eliminate anything except functionality?

As if that isn't enough, if you happen to ride outside cell phone range (like say, in the mountains) you're out of luck - no maps, no coverage. Ouch. And at $349 retail it costs more than the top of the line (for the moment) Garmin Edge - and the Allen Sport can't even track heart rate or cadence!

Trimble has a similar system and I've always wondered why you'd go to such lengths to use a cell phone for something it's not designed to do. The iPod is great at playing music, the Razr is a good cell phone, and the Edge is a capable GPS for biking. Why mess with that?

My advice is that Allen stick to what it knows - building bike racks. Leave the tech to the geeks.
<a href="http://www.allenracks.com/">Allen Sports</a> announced a new GPS-cellphone navigation system at Interbike this week that's a bit perplexing. I mean, the premise is that The Navigator lets you use your cell phone to navigate while on the bike and eliminates the need for a separate GPS device. But hold on - you gotta bring along the Allen Sports GPS pod that transmits position data to your cellphone via bluetooth. Now you have two devices AND you're using your tiny cell phone screen to look at the map. Huh? How did that eliminate anything except functionality?

As if that isn't enough, if you happen to ride outside cell phone range (like say, in the mountains) you're out of luck - no maps, no coverage. Ouch. And at $349 retail it costs more than the top of the line (for the moment) Garmin Edge - and the Allen Sport can't even track heart rate or cadence!

Trimble has a similar system and I've always wondered why you'd go to such lengths to use a cell phone for something it's not designed to do. The iPod is great at playing music, the Razr is a good cell phone, and the Edge is a capable GPS for biking. Why mess with that?

My advice is that Allen stick to what it knows - building bike racks. Leave the tech to the geeks.
<a href="http://www.allenracks.com/">Allen Sports</a> announced a new GPS-cellphone navigation system at Interbike this week that's a bit perplexing. I mean, the premise is that The Navigator lets you use your cell phone to navigate while on the bike and eliminates the need for a separate GPS device. But hold on - you gotta bring along the Allen Sports GPS pod that transmits position data to your cellphone via bluetooth. Now you have two devices AND you're using your tiny cell phone screen to look at the map. Huh? How did that eliminate anything except functionality?

As if that isn't enough, if you happen to ride outside cell phone range (like say, in the mountains) you're out of luck - no maps, no coverage. Ouch. And at $349 retail it costs more than the top of the line (for the moment) Garmin Edge - and the Allen Sport can't even track heart rate or cadence!

Trimble has a similar system and I've always wondered why you'd go to such lengths to use a cell phone for something it's not designed to do. The iPod is great at playing music, the Razr is a good cell phone, and the Edge is a capable GPS for biking. Why mess with that?

My advice is that Allen stick to what it knows - building bike racks. Leave the tech to the geeks.
  1
<a href="http://www.allenracks.com/">Allen Sports</a> announced a new GPS-cellphone navigation system at Interbike this week that's a bit perplexing. I mean, the premise is that The Navigator lets you use your cell phone to navigate while on the bike and eliminates the need for a separate GPS device. But hold on - you gotta bring along the Allen Sports GPS pod that transmits position data to your cellphone via bluetooth. Now you have two devices AND you're using your tiny cell phone screen to look at the map. Huh? How did that eliminate anything except functionality?

As if that isn't enough, if you happen to ride outside cell phone range (like say, in the mountains) you're out of luck - no maps, no coverage. Ouch. And at $349 retail it costs more than the top of the line (for the moment) Garmin Edge - and the Allen Sport can't even track heart rate or cadence!

Trimble has a similar system and I've always wondered why you'd go to such lengths to use a cell phone for something it's not designed to do. The iPod is great at playing music, the Razr is a good cell phone, and the Edge is a capable GPS for biking. Why mess with that?

My advice is that Allen stick to what it knows - building bike racks. Leave the tech to the geeks.
  1
<a href="http://www.allenracks.com/">Allen Sports</a> announced a new GPS-cellphone navigation system at Interbike this week that's a bit perplexing. I mean, the premise is that The Navigator lets you use your cell phone to navigate while on the bike and eliminates the need for a separate GPS device. But hold on - you gotta bring along the Allen Sports GPS pod that transmits position data to your cellphone via bluetooth. Now you have two devices AND you're using your tiny cell phone screen to look at the map. Huh? How did that eliminate anything except functionality?

As if that isn't enough, if you happen to ride outside cell phone range (like say, in the mountains) you're out of luck - no maps, no coverage. Ouch. And at $349 retail it costs more than the top of the line (for the moment) Garmin Edge - and the Allen Sport can't even track heart rate or cadence!

Trimble has a similar system and I've always wondered why you'd go to such lengths to use a cell phone for something it's not designed to do. The iPod is great at playing music, the Razr is a good cell phone, and the Edge is a capable GPS for biking. Why mess with that?

My advice is that Allen stick to what it knows - building bike racks. Leave the tech to the geeks.
  1
A black and blue CamelBak backpack designed for outdoor activities, featuring a hydration reservoir and a drinking tube, padded shoulder straps, and multiple compartments for gear storage.
  1
<a href="http://www.allenracks.com/">Allen Sports</a> announced a new GPS-cellphone navigation system at Interbike this week that's a bit perplexing. I mean, the premise is that The Navigator lets you use your cell phone to navigate while on the bike and eliminates the need for a separate GPS device. But hold on - you gotta bring along the Allen Sports GPS pod that transmits position data to your cellphone via bluetooth. Now you have two devices AND you're using your tiny cell phone screen to look at the map. Huh? How did that eliminate anything except functionality?

As if that isn't enough, if you happen to ride outside cell phone range (like say, in the mountains) you're out of luck - no maps, no coverage. Ouch. And at $349 retail it costs more than the top of the line (for the moment) Garmin Edge - and the Allen Sport can't even track heart rate or cadence!

Trimble has a similar system and I've always wondered why you'd go to such lengths to use a cell phone for something it's not designed to do. The iPod is great at playing music, the Razr is a good cell phone, and the Edge is a capable GPS for biking. Why mess with that?

My advice is that Allen stick to what it knows - building bike racks. Leave the tech to the geeks.
<a href="http://www.allenracks.com/">Allen Sports</a> announced a new GPS-cellphone navigation system at Interbike this week that's a bit perplexing. I mean, the premise is that The Navigator lets you use your cell phone to navigate while on the bike and eliminates the need for a separate GPS device. But hold on - you gotta bring along the Allen Sports GPS pod that transmits position data to your cellphone via bluetooth. Now you have two devices AND you're using your tiny cell phone screen to look at the map. Huh? How did that eliminate anything except functionality?

As if that isn't enough, if you happen to ride outside cell phone range (like say, in the mountains) you're out of luck - no maps, no coverage. Ouch. And at $349 retail it costs more than the top of the line (for the moment) Garmin Edge - and the Allen Sport can't even track heart rate or cadence!

Trimble has a similar system and I've always wondered why you'd go to such lengths to use a cell phone for something it's not designed to do. The iPod is great at playing music, the Razr is a good cell phone, and the Edge is a capable GPS for biking. Why mess with that?

My advice is that Allen stick to what it knows - building bike racks. Leave the tech to the geeks.
  4
A motorcyclist performing a jump over a muddy water puddle in a snowy forest setting, surrounded by tall pine trees.
  1
A smiling man wearing a colorful floral shirt and a blue bucket hat stands with his arms crossed on a dirt path. He is surrounded by a scenic landscape with rolling hills and clear blue skies in the background.