Pay to Ride? Wyoming is Eyeing User Fees Targeting Mountain Bikers 

In Wyoming, officials at the Office of Outdoor Recreation are testing the waters of implementing new user fees targeting mountain bikers to fund essential trail work.
A mountain biker climbs up a trail in the Wilkins Peak network in Green River, Wyoming. Photo: Matt Miller

It’s no secret that the era of COVID-19 was a boon to the outdoor recreation economy of the United States. 

When lockdowns swept the country, people took to trails and parks in record numbers. Little known state parks became hotbeds of activity. Obscure swaths of public land in the West bloomed with new visitors of all stripes; and they were engaged in the entire spectrum of outdoor recreation — from hiking, fishing, and mountain biking to hunting, foraging, and long-term dispersed camping. 

While this well-documented “COVID bump” has largely subsided now, it amplified the number of public land stakeholders from sea to shining sea and left a substantial contingency of new outdoor enthusiasts in its wake. Along with that amplification has come a marked increase in demand for new trails on public land and heightened maintenance needs for existing trail networks — all efforts that require a steady stream of cash and, often, a lot of volunteer sweat and labor. 

Because trails aren’t cheap to maintain and even more costly to construct from scratch, public land managers all over the country are searching for new revenue streams to help them keep pace with all of the impending growth. 

In Wyoming, officials at the Office of Outdoor Recreation are testing the often fraught, sometimes tepid waters of implementing new user fees that would fund essential trail work. One possible way to go about it, they say, is to charge mountain bikers a fee to ride trails on public lands. 

Finding a way for funding

“The idea has been batted around about it being a mountain bike-specific fee, but that’s in no way defined or decided,” Wyoming Outdoor Recreation Office Manager Patrick Harrington told Singletracks. “It depends on what members of the public think.”

Harrington came to his current job after working as the superintendent of Wyoming’s Curt Gowdy State Park, which is home to about 30 miles of popular mountain biking trails. During his time there, he says he watched user numbers skyrocket. 

“In 2019 visitation was about 221,000,” he said. “In 2020, it was 620,000, and then last year it dropped slightly to 535,000 — still double what it was pre-pandemic.” 

Harrington attributes a sizable portion of that increase to the surging popularity of Curt Gowdy State Park’s mountain bike trail network.

“A lot of that visitation — probably 60 percent — is day use, and a good 50 percent of that was mountain bikers,” he said. “We were definitely seeing growth in both hiking and mountain biking, and I think that bears out across the entire state.”

Since the influx isn’t unique to Wyoming’s state parks — the state’s USFS and BLM lands saw a substantial increase in use during COVID — Harrington wants any discussion of new user fees to encompass federally managed public land as well. 

“They’ve certainly asked me to look at something like trail fees in state parks,” he said. “But I think the greatest impact would be across the state in all public lands on all public trail systems, but that’s going to depend exclusively on what people out across Wyoming think is best for the state.”

Curt Gowdy State Park. Photo from Singletracks member Dank No_Co

People who have advocated for new outdoor user fees in the past point to the success of other play-to-play models associated with hunting, fishing, and motorized sports. The Pittman-Robertson Act, for example, which directs federal excise taxes on guns and ammo into the coffers of state wildlife agencies, generated nearly $1 billion for wildlife conservation in 2020 alone, according to the U.S. Department of the Interior. 

Proponents say that new user fees could give mountain bikers, and other groups that don’t currently pay upfront fees, some more skin in the game. 

But before Harrington and his colleagues at the Wyoming Office of Outdoor Recreation consider implementing any mountain bike-specific user fees, and define the form that such measures could ultimately take, they want to thoroughly gauge the public’s interest. 

“We’re looking at a way of generating resources to continue to sustain trail development, and as we sit now, it’s completely and intentionally undeveloped,” Harrington said. “Our goal is, this fall when summer seasons close down, to get out and about in the community and start listening to stakeholders and constituents and see how they feel about it. And ultimately, if they don’t like it, collectively, if people aren’t in support of it, then we won’t pursue it.”

Why Mountain Bikers? They ‘Take of Care of the Stuff Better Than Anybody?’

Brent Skorcz is one of the founders and the acting treasurer of the Sweetwater Mountain Biking Association, a non-profit organization that works to build and maintain mountain biking trails in and around Green River, Wyoming. The idea of a mountain bike-specific user fee doesn’t sit well with him. 

“I hate to be negative about it, but I just can’t see it working,” Scorcz said. “Why pinpoint mountain bikers, just picking on them, when we are the ones who probably take care of the stuff better than anybody?”

Scorcz (right) on the trails in Green River, Wyoming. Photo: Matt Miller

Scorcz questions the notion of the state charging mountain bikers to ride on federally managed trails that state officials had no hand in creating or maintaining. 

“I don’t think Wyoming’s in any position to start charging user fees,” he said. “There’s only a few places that I know that the state has actually put in their own trails. Everywhere else the mountain bikers are doing their own work. All the trails around Green River, nobody from the state has anything to do with it. We put our own trails in. We maintain our own trails.”

He thinks that mountain bike-specific fees, whether they take the form of a state-issued bike decal or a fee for trailhead parking, could ultimately cause out-of-state mountain bikers to forgo Wyoming for other nearby bike-friendly states. 

“I ride in Utah all the time. I ride in Colorado all the time. I go down to Sedona and down to Phoenix in the winter time,” he said, “I know I’ve paid for parking in places like Sedona, but as far as a user fee…I’ve never had to buy a tag to stick on my bike to say I can ride in that state. I think it’ll just run more people off, prevent people from coming here if they have to pay to ride on a dirt track or singletrack.”

Members of the Sundance Chain Gang Mountain Biking Association (SCGMBA), based in the northeastern part of the state, echoed Scorcz’s sentiments. 

In an email to Singltracks, SCGMBA said its members would not support the imposition of mountain bike-specific fees for riders using National Forest trails. 

“If [fees are implemented], then all users should pay,” SCGMBA said in the email. “And equines a more substantial amount due to trail maintenance needs for trail damages and heavy foot traffic.” 

The club went on to say that one possible exception would be the construction of purpose-built bike or terrain parks on federal or state land.

“If a national forest or state park builds a bike [or] terrain park, we do believe it is necessary for fees to be charged to facilitate upkeep and maintenance,” SCGMBA said. “[But] we know that this will never happen. Our club members work or worked at federal agencies, and we know the limitations.”  

Precedence and a different approach

This isn’t the first time Wyoming state officials have explored the concept of mountain bike-specific user fees. In 2017, the Wyoming State Legislature voted down a bill that would have required decals for mountain bikes used on public lands. 

Harrington said that bill failed because the funds it would have generated weren’t exclusively earmarked for trails. 

“Some of the funding was intended for other uses,” he said. “While still semi-trail related, it wasn’t directly for construction and maintenance of trails, and I think that’s why that bill failed.” 

He says that any money generated from new user fees in Wyoming would be funneled toward improvements for existing trails and the construction of new ones. 

“I think that would be the ultimate intention,” Harrington said. “Trail construction and maintenance — get that money right back in the ground and into products that those users who pay the fee are going to benefit from.”

It remains to be seen whether new user fees for mountain bikers or other user groups will actually make it past the conceptualization phase and into the realm of concrete implementation. But it’s fair to say that the public’s opinion of any such fees will guide the process going forward. 

“I think all agree that there’s a need for funding for trail construction and maintenance,” Harrington said. “I think if we leave it at that, it’s a consensus of all trail users and bike shop owners and hiking groups and the Audubon Society. I think we all agree there. But how we get there is the part that is really requiring some conversation.”

If a new measure creating user fees is proposed, it’ll likely require a stamp of approval from the state legislature before it can be implemented, according to Harrington.

“If it’s revenue generating, it’ll have to go through the Wyoming Legislature,” he said. “This is not a topic for consideration in the next legislative session in 2023. We’re looking at the year after that. If this is going to come up, that’s likely when it will.” 

Related articles

  1. The Rise of Pay-to-Play and Exclusive Mountain Bike Trails
  2. Trail Funding Part I: How MTB Organizations Raise Money for Trails
  3. Advocacy Alert: Three GA State Parks to Target Mountain Bikers with a Trail Fee
  4. BOLT Act Aims to Fund Long Distance Bike Trails in the US