April 6, 2015 at 10:00 #127008
I originally posted this in the West forum, because that’s where I ride. But, I’d like to hear from the rest since there is so much experience out there. Looking for some boots-on-the-ground rider input for a new bike.
My riding is out-the-door high country in the summer and fall (Steamboat area), road trips to the desert (Vernal, Fruita, Moab), and some summer road trips (CT segments, The Crest, and hopefully CB). Intermediate to intermediate+ to moderate advanced is what I enjoy. The point here, varied terrain. Greg, John, this is what you guys know best.
The goal, a versatile new bike. The problem, too much information out there. The question, is this getting like the ski industry, too many options but everything new is pretty darn good?!
#1, 29er will be the choice (at 6’4", it is a requirement). #2, I think 120mm upfront is all I need (been riding a 2011 Rumblefish with a 120 Reba, does the job).
Clarity — is there a suspension system(s) that truly stands out;, or, do they all do the job? For example, all I know is the Rumblefish design, but the "new" version of the ‘Fish is a 29er Fuel with the floater. Yeti, switch tech, yeah the story sounds great, but what is the true difference? Niner, the CV has been a staple, difference maker? Pivot?
You get where I am going with this? Every company has a story, but for the versatile bike are all of these within the 5% "get it done range", and does it/should it come down to which bike feels the best when you sit in the cockpit? Or, is the Fork really where the priority stands?
Carbon (frame vs wheels) — main frame only carbon, saves a pound and a half, worth it? (lose the Boulder chips habit!) Full carbon, pricey bike. Rear stiffness a big value? Wheels set, now is THIS where the money should go? Can’t recall the bike, but I did see a spec of aluminum frame with carbon wheels, this may actually make sense on the $$$ to performance transfer!
1x — I know this answer for me, no way. Did anyone catch the recent MB Action write up about the new XTR front derailleur, stating it is so good that they are reconsidering the 1x…? What a load of crap and back-tracking to make everyone in the industry happy. The 1x for anyone who rides where I do is no good, for climbing and forest service road return reasons.
Also, if you think I missed something important to consider, please do tell…
April 7, 2015 at 07:39 #127009
There’s a lot in that post–it reminds me of when I bought my first bike way back in 2000 and there were nowhere near the choices we have now. Even then I suffered from paralysis by analysis. Having been through the bike buying routine four times now and having ridden, demoed, and reviewed countless others, the most useful thing I think I can say is to use all that tech talk only as an intro or teaser–all useful input to your decision comes from riding and not reading.
Physique, physiology, attitude and riding style are all completely unique to the individual, so there’s not a whole lot someone, especially someone who doesn’t know you and your style well, can say that will guarantee the best outcome. What I can say definitively is that no one bike is best for everyone, regardless of price or marketing.
More directly to your post, there is no one suspension system which is best for everyone. Most modern suspensions are excellent and none are bad. Even the basic single pivot has been refined over the years to the point it holds up well against far more complex and expensive designs. Even within a suspension type, execution may lead to significantly different results. For instance, Santa Cruz and Intense both use the VPP (virtual pivot point) suspension. The SC Bronson and Intense Tracer are both 27.5" wheeled, 6" travel bikes with the same suspension and similar geometry, so they should ride about the same, but they feel very different to me. I have ridden Horst Link bikes I love and Horst Link bikes I can’t stand. There are two many variables to pick a suspension that rules them all, let alone a bike.
My personal favorite I’ve ridden is the Yeti Switch. I haven’t yet tried the Yeti Switch Infinity which is supposedly even better. But that doesn’t mean it will be anyone else’s preference, even someone who rides like I do. I’ve also broken a couple Yeti’s, so I’m leery of buying another, no matter how perfect the suspension is for me. There’s always a ton of tradeoffs — suspension, weight, geometry, price to name a few.
It sounds like you’re riding preference is much like my own but maybe slightly more trail/cross country and slightly less all-mountain/enduro . For that riding, it sounds like a 5" travel trail bike is the best option. If you decide you want to ride more gnar, than a 6" all mountain bike is more the ticket. The good news is that bikes in most categories have becomen more versatile" today’s trail bikes can really handle some all-mountain gnar and today’s all mountain bikes are suitable for long cross country days in the saddle. I think your last statement is spot on — lot’s of options and most of them are pretty darn good.
Is price range a big concern for you? Do you have any feelings about mass produced vs boutique bikes?
Here’s some which are really getting rave reviews and/or I have ridden myself and like very much:
Ibis Mojo HD
Pivot Mach 429
Rocky Mountain Instinct
Rocky Mountain Thunderbolt
Santa Cruz 5010
Ibis Mojo HDR
Intense Tracer 275
Pivot Mach 6c
Santa Cruz Bronson
Santa Cruz Nomad
Geometry varies widely among the above. Santa Cruz and Pivot tend to run short in the top tube and Yeti long with the others being more neutral. Of course that can partially compensated for by saddle placement on the rails and changing stem length, but that will also affect handling.
I tend to be allergic to Trek, Specialized, Giant and Cannondale, but thy also all make great bikes across all riding styles so don’t discount them either.
Bottom line–get out and ride as many as you can, and across as many conditions possible. Find a demo day if you can–they can be both enlightening as well as tons o’ fun.
As for carbon–I think it’s well worth it if it fits your pocketbook. The combination of light weight and stiffness is noticeable. Wheels are indeed the best upgrade possible. Some will take a great wheelset before spending the extra $$ on carbon which is understandable. But if you start out with a great carbon frame, you can always upgrade the wheels later.
- Sneaky build idea
- 1 week, 6 days ago
- Tire Sealant mixing question. Stans Vs Bontrager
- 2 weeks, 6 days ago
- what bike and why do you ride a full sus?
- 1 month ago
You must be logged in to reply to this topic.