Awkward Moment. What do you do?

Forums Mountain Bike Forum Awkward Moment. What do you do?


This topic contains 28 replies, has 22 voices, and was last updated by  jstack11 10 months, 1 week ago.

Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 29 total)
  • Author
  • #228748

    We were riding when a helmetless rider rode up to us. Everytime I see one of these guys I have the same response as seeing a smoker. “They STILL do that?” The Mr Safety in me says I should say something. But I never do. I just mind my own business. What do you guys do? I guess if they are older they should know better. But if they are younger maybe a little old guy or old gal advise?


    Mind your own business and go ride your own ride.  Sorry to be harsh, but he is enjoying his ride and you are judging.  Share one of those cigarettes, relax, it’s not your place.  I think it’s rude when people try to force their perceived “safety comfort zone” rules on others in a public place.  If it’s your land or your organized ride then it can be your rules.

    The problem with even what seem like common sense rules is where do you draw the line?  Just because you ride in a helmet does not mean I should.  If you ride a full-face should I?  Is it OK to wear short socks, no gloves, dark clothing?  Maybe I think being clipped in is dangerous and I look down on your from my moral high ground of flat pedals.  I don’t even agree with mandatory seat belts.  I am not arguing whether or not these things work I just don’t believe in forcing my ideas on others.


    2 cents.  Hope it didn’t come off as angry.


    Thats what I do..Just was wondering if there was other responses. Your response was not harsh. No apology is necessary. Thanks!


    Agreed. I smile and wave.

    And I’ll stop and help him when he sustains massive head trauma.


    This is one of those situations where you can either turn a blind eye when you see a problem or intervene. If that was me in this instance i would tell him straight –  wear a helmet and stop being selfish! I wouldn’t be nice.

    I hate people like this. They think it’s great to do whatever they like but expect other people to clean up the mess when something happens.

    The problem with intervention is that you will most likely get a mouthful so i can understand why no one wants to step up. But if no one steps up how will the problem get fixed? Dilemma :<


    If it’s not something that will endanger someone else (like wearing a helmet) or jeopardize mountain bike access- don’t say anything. I understand wanting to help but trying to tell/suggest/force someone to do something seldom works.


    We were riding Wolf Branch and as we were making turn to cross the little bridge and continue, two young long haired men came flying down the rollers, one just missing a tree at the turn. We looked at each other and silently shook our heads. What’s that saying, “you can lead a horse……….”


    What do you guys do?

    I smile and wave. But i grew up in an era when cigarettes were cool and if you wore a helmet in my neighborhood you would have very likely gotten beat-up for being a pansy.

    I wear a helmet nowadays, but it’s never come into play in my various wipeouts. I’ve often wondered about the irony of needing protective gear for a leisurely activity; perhaps that’s an indication that the activity itself should be banned or restricted?  (my parents would love this and that’s what, as you say, “Mr. Safety” would say)….but then we’d all be limited to playing golf or volleyball.

    ….so yeah, smile and wave at the helmet-less souls and, in my case, get a little bit nostalgic.



    tell them “put on a lid before you fall and get hurt and 74 lawyers showup and get us all banned from riding here”..its my go to line but you can use it too





    I mind my own business, unless it is a state park that requires a helmet, then I say “Don’t let the ranger catch you without a helmet. They will ticket you and kick you out.”


    I usually have an older helmet I keep in my car as a spare for unexpected riders or myself if I forget mine.  I have offered it to helmetless riders in the past at trail heads.  Haven’t had a taker yet.  Too me it is insane to ride without one, but to others its normal.  Oh well…


    I decided that humans were garbage a long time ago. My only reservation in seeing someone riding a local trail sans lid is not for their safety, but that they may pursue the American dream and sue the the park, land owners, mountain biking organization for their own filthy lucre. Insomuch, the only thing I ever say to such vermin is to please not sue when subsequent to a concussion their offspring does not get into an Ivy League school.


    ^^^ This.  I don’t think people are bad inherently.  But if by their own choice they say it’s their problem but upon consequence they decide to make it someone/everyone else problem that is the ultimate problem with libertarian thinking.  And even is said bucket-less rider crashes and requires $$$ in medical bills – who pays for it?  Doesn’t matter if health insurance is government or privately funded – but other users will end up paying it.


    As much as I almost feel compelled to say something I never do.  But 2 things always come to mind:

    1.  I remember ducking under some overgrown foliage during a ride one time when the top of my helmet smashed into something immobile.  Stopped me dead in my tracks.  I could feel the jolt down through my neck.  When I stopped and inspected the area I found a large tree limb had fallen but was held suspended about 6 feet above the ground just behind a canopy of overgrowth… riders or runners would be completely blind to the limb if going the direction I was.  The limb was large enough and wedged in such a way that I couldn’t move it. Best I could do was to clear the foliage so at least it was visible to others.  My neck was sore the next few days.  Always makes me wonder, what if I weren’t wearing a helmet?

    2.  The potential for litigation and threat to other trail users.  In a world where it’s “always some else’s fault” it never ceases to amaze me how people acting irresponsibly can somehow sue others and reap monetary damages from their idiocy – in this case from trail/land owners – which ultimately affects everyone else’s rights.  I only wish these idiots were forced to sign a waiver releasing all others of any claims and that they, solely, would be responsible for their own medical expenses.  If that were the case I’d be perfectly fine with it.  “Stupid is as Stupid Does”


    I’m with Kwogfive, just because I choose to wear a helmet doesn’t mean everyone else should have to. And I don’t think it is selfish in the least to forego wearing a lid if someone so chooses. Last I checked, EMTs, doctors and ambulance drivers are PAID to do what they do. First-responders volunteer of their own accord. No-one is forcing anyone to clean up someone else’s mess. Honestly, that’s like complaining that if someone breaks their car, it’s selfish because “someone else has to fix it.” Yes, someone else will fix it because THAT’S THEIR CHOSEN CAREER! They make money at it!

    So when I see someone on the trail who isn’t wearing a helmet, I promptly proceed to mind my own business and greet them as I would anyone else.

    …but I also smoke, so maybe I’m just sub-human anyway.




    “First-responders volunteer of their own accord. No-one is forcing anyone to clean up someone else’s mess. Honestly, that’s like…”

    With an attitude like that the volunteers might suddenly stop volunteering.


    Slightly unrelated but…

    Once when riding i came across 2 people on the trail. One had a puncture and neither had a spare tube. I immediately pulled out my only spare tube and put it in their bike and all the while they were immersed in their private conversation. I even pumped it up. Once done they jumped on their bikes and rode off without any kind of thank you. Not verbally, not even a smile glance. I’m sick of being taken for granted by people who only care about their own selfish needs and wants. If i come across people like this again they can walk home.


    craZivn, I think you’re missing the main point.  This is not about imparting one’s opinions, value, or in this case, common sense, on someone else.  If an individual is willing to accept what they consider to be an “acceptable risk” to themselves, that’s their call.  However, if that risk – which most would consider to be an “undue risk” – could adversely affect other people’s rights, that’s where the concerns lie.  If someone suffers a significant head injury while riding without a helmet I can see that person suing the park, landowner, local bike chapter, etc.  That has the potential to impact everyone else.  Trails have been closed to MTB for similar reasons.

    I also don’t think your car analogy is comparable.  What is analogous is if you drive a car without a seatbelt and get into an accident where you sustain bodily injury.  In that case, the insurance company can actually deny or devalue your claim because the risk of injury is much higher than if you were wearing a seatbelt… not to mention the fact that you’ll incur the fine.

    There’s a reason why organized rides, races and training sessions require a helmet… it’s all about liability.  But as stated above, if an individual is willing to accept sole responsibility for riding without a helmet then they can knock themselves out, (figuratively, that is 😉


    If you’re at a stoplight next to a motorcyclist without a helmet, do you roll down your window and tell them to put a helmet on?

    I mostly ski without a helmet, and I accept the risks I’m taking.  I’d be super pissed if someone got up in my grill about it.  You don’t  know anything about the helmetless person.  Perhaps they just found out that they have 2 weeks to live and just wanna ride without a helmet and enjoy some freedom from ‘common sense’ for a little while.  I’d feel like a total jerk if I said something.

    Let it go… The more indignant we get about the little things, the lamer it is to be around each other.  Don’t sweat the small shit, and just judge the quality and choices of other peoples’ bikes instead 🙂


    Rmap01,  I agree that unfortunately we do live in a lawsuit-prone world, however I still consider choosing to forego a lid as being in the “acceptable risk” category.

    Take your seatbelt analogy, for instance.
    “What is analogous is if you drive a car without a seatbelt and get into an accident where you sustain bodily injury.  In that case, the insurance company can actually deny or devalue your claim because the risk of injury is much higher than if you were wearing a seatbelt… not to mention the fact that you’ll incur the fine.”

    In your example, I bring the hammer down upon myself by choosing not to wear a seatbelt. Since I didn’t wear a seatbelt, I am now being denied certain avenues of recompense which would otherwise be available. And I’m incurring a fine. But the end result is that I am even MORE liable than I would have been if I’d been wearing a belt. And I am the one who suffers for it, not anyone else. (A notable difference is that in the seatbelt analogy, I could be liable for endangering others since a seatbelt theoretically helps keep the driver in control of the car, whereas choosing not to wear a helmet endangers only the individual rider and not others on the trail.)

    In a similar way, if a biker chooses not to wear a helmet, and they get hurt, and try to sue, I think their chances of success are diminished since they have not taken the precautions advised in every bicycle owner’s pamphlet and on many trail maps and trailhead signs. Speaking of signs, every trail I’ve ridden at has a prominent “RIDE AT YOUR OWN RISK” message posted at the trailhead and usually printed on the trail map as well. If someone is out to make a lawsuit case, having a lid on their head isn’t going to stop them. Prominent warnings at the trailhead could.

    Do you have some examples of MTB trails that have been closed due to injury lawsuits? While I’ve heard it said that such things have happened, I’ve never seen an actual example.



Viewing 20 posts - 1 through 20 (of 29 total)

You must be logged in to reply to this topic.