Camelbak M.U.L.E. Hydration Review

4.73 out of 5
I Want One  
By Greg Heil    on Sep 19, 2016

Rider Questions


Q: does it fit big men -Guest

A: I'm 6'1" 225# and it fits me fine.

ATeam answered on February 7, 2017. Did you find this helpful? Yes | No


Members' Gear
Product Options (2)
Camelbak M.U.L.E. NV
Camelbak M.U.L.E. (Military)

January 22, 2017
Model/Year: 2010

Pros: Reliable, lots of space

Cons: Starting to fade as it's black

Recommendation: Overall a good MTB backpack that sits well.

ReplyWas this helpful? Yes | No

January 7, 2017
Model/Year: 2016

Pros: Well made

Cons: None

Recommendation: I really like the mule. Received as a gift for Christmas. Perfect size. Able to fit rain gear if needed and snacks plus plenty of water. Definitely a plus on longer rides. The adjustments on the straps allow you to carry higher or lower for comfort. I have had no issues with sweating underneath while here in Florida. The design allows for airflow underneath.

ReplyWas this helpful? Yes | No

January 2, 2017
Model/Year: 2000

Pros: durable, comfortable, had mine so long I don't remember the year they came out.

Cons: o-ring kits aren't always easy to find.

Recommendation: recommend

ReplyWas this helpful? Yes | No

April 9, 2016
Model/Year: 2015

Pros: Great love it stores lots of water and can carry a multi tool safety kit goggles mini pump spare intertube tire leavers and still have room to tuck a spare shirt or jacket inside has hooks to strap your helmet to and the hydro pack can carry 3 liters or 100 oz of water

Cons: when full can be kind of heavy

Recommendation: i would highly recommend this to any one who likes to be prepared for a ride

ReplyWas this helpful? Yes | No

March 28, 2016
Pros: Storage durability nv

Cons: Price

Recommendation: Good pack for hauling a lot of gear and water

ReplyWas this helpful? Yes | No

March 27, 2016
Model/Year: Mule NV 2016

Pros: Storage, quality & fit

Cons: none yet

Recommendation: This pack has tons of storage and is great for long rides. It also looks great (pretty much all black). The zippers are high quality and the phone storage is easily accessible from the top and is big enough for my 6

ReplyWas this helpful? Yes | No

March 19, 2016
Pros: Good size and capacity

Cons: None

Recommendation: Most of my crew has this particular pack.

ReplyWas this helpful? Yes | No

March 16, 2016
Model/Year: 2002

Pros: Light, well made, large capacity for storage and water.

Cons: Costly, decreased ventilation compared to newer models.

Recommendation: Ive had this pack for over 12 years now and it still is my go-to pack. The new models are different and look bigger. I love this has been to hell and back and still works like the day I bought it. I have replaced the bladder once...just because It was so grimy I didnt' want to clean it.

ReplyWas this helpful? Yes | No

January 22, 2016
Model/Year: 2015

Pros: Holds plenty of water, durable, does not move around, carries plenty of water, has a rain cover, has a dedicated spot for cell phone or iPod, zippers are great quality, spot to hang keys.

Cons: Storage is limited when the water reservoir is full.

Recommendation: I would definitely recommend this pack to anyone who isn't doing an all day ride but still wants the space to carry a bunch of H2O and some trail tools.

ReplyWas this helpful? Yes | No

August 26, 2015
Pros: Great capacity, but not too big.

Cons: $$$

Recommendation: Get one you'll love it.

ReplyWas this helpful? Yes | No

Camelbak M.U.L.E. 4.73 out of 5 based on 83 ratings. 83 user reviews.