<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Support new singletrack at Big Bend National Park, Texas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.singletracks.com/blog/mtb-trails/support-new-singletrack-at-big-bend-national-park-texas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.singletracks.com/blog/mtb-trails/support-new-singletrack-at-big-bend-national-park-texas/</link>
	<description>Mountain bike news, trails, travels, and dirt.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 01:39:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Injured rider fights back; IMBA rocks &#124;&#124; Mountain Bike Blog &#124;&#124; SINGLETRACKS.COM</title>
		<link>http://www.singletracks.com/blog/mtb-trails/support-new-singletrack-at-big-bend-national-park-texas/comment-page-1/#comment-2302</link>
		<dc:creator>Injured rider fights back; IMBA rocks &#124;&#124; Mountain Bike Blog &#124;&#124; SINGLETRACKS.COM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Sep 2008 15:41:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.singletracks.com/blog/?p=1097#comment-2302</guid>
		<description>[...] On a more positive note, IMBA has been making serious progress on the mountain bike trail access front. Do you ever wonder what happens with all those petitions and donations IMBA is always asking for (like these: 1 2 3)? Well this week we got to see that the letters and dollars are working: The U.S. Forest Service notified all employees that mountain biking will be managed the same as hiking and equestrian usage on USFS land. This means some forest areas that had been regulating mountain biking in the same way as motorized usage could be opening more trails to bikes in the future. Sweet! From the SportsOneSource article: Bedwell&#8217;s announcement comes at a time when some national forests have applied similar restrictions to bicycles and motor vehicles. IMBA believes most Forest Service staff understand bicycling is a quiet, non-motorized, low-impact activity, and hopes the letter provides the guidance necessary for consistent treatment of mountain biking on every national forest. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On a more positive note, IMBA has been making serious progress on the mountain bike trail access front. Do you ever wonder what happens with all those petitions and donations IMBA is always asking for (like these: 1 2 3)? Well this week we got to see that the letters and dollars are working: The U.S. Forest Service notified all employees that mountain biking will be managed the same as hiking and equestrian usage on USFS land. This means some forest areas that had been regulating mountain biking in the same way as motorized usage could be opening more trails to bikes in the future. Sweet! From the SportsOneSource article: Bedwell&#8217;s announcement comes at a time when some national forests have applied similar restrictions to bicycles and motor vehicles. IMBA believes most Forest Service staff understand bicycling is a quiet, non-motorized, low-impact activity, and hopes the letter provides the guidance necessary for consistent treatment of mountain biking on every national forest. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

